1 / 1

Introduction

EMG Amplitude Estimation to Torque About a Joint “Better amplitude estimation = Better torque prediction ” Student: Oljeta Bida Advisor: Edward Clancy Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Worcester Polytechnic Institute. Introduction. Noise Reject-Filter. Detect |·| d. Whiten.

shira
Download Presentation

Introduction

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. EMG Amplitude Estimation to Torque About a Joint“Better amplitude estimation = Better torque prediction”Student: Oljeta Bida Advisor: Edward ClancyElectrical and Computer Engineering Department, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Introduction Noise Reject-Filter Detect|·|d Whiten Noise Reject- Filter Detect|·|d Whiten Noise Reject-Filter Detect|·|d Whiten Noise Reject-Filter Detect|·|d Whiten • Research Objective • Prove the hypothesis that better EMG amplitude processing results into better torque prediction, using dynamic system modeling. • Select and design an EMG to torque model that captures most of the system’s dynamic and is consistent with its physical characteristics. EMG Extension 0 Extensor EMG Amplitude Estimator Extensor EMG Amplitude to Torque Estimator E(n) TE EMG Extension 1 … Flexion _ EMG Extension Lth Σ Testimate EMG Flexion 0 Flexor EMG Amplitude Estimator Flexor EMG Amplitude to Torque Estimator + F(n) TF EMG Flexion 1 … EMG Flexion Lth Extension EMG Amplitude Estimation System ID Extension or Flexion Channels (0-to-3) m0(t) m1(t) Spatial Uncorrelate and Gain Normalize Re-Linearize(·)1/d EMG Amplitude E(n) or F(n) m2(t) Smooth . . . . . . . . . m3(t) • System Identification Problem • System ID model used: FIR • System T = X*gopt is Linear and has an optimal solution when obtained using Linear Least Squares Method (LLS) Definitions ElectroMyoGram (EMG) A measure and recording of the electrical activity in skeletal muscle. EMG Amplitude is defined as the time- varying standard deviation of the EMG signal. EMG Extension 3 EMG Extension 2 EMG Extension 1 EMG Extension 0 EMG Flexion 3 EMG Flexion 2 • Raw EMG Signal & Amplitude Estimation -- Extension (left) and Flexion (right) --Units are normalized to EMG Amplitude at Maximum-Voluntary-Contraction (MVC), in percent EMG Flexion 1 EMG Flexion 0 • EMG to Torque Block Diagram • EMG-to-Torque Prediction Results • EMG-to-Torque System ID performance Evaluated in %Variance-Accounted-For (%VAF) and Mean-Absolute-Error (MAE) • First Block: EMG Amplitude Estimation • Second Block: System Identification • Polynomial Form of a strictly causal FIR system model • System Matrix Form T = X*gopt • Conclusion EMG-to-Torque predictions improve with higher quality EMG signal processing: - First, by utilizing multiple EMG channels instead of one when estimating EMG amplitude, - Second, through whitening of the raw EMG signal.

More Related