1 / 24

Blue: An Alternative Approach to Active Queue Management

Blue: An Alternative Approach to Active Queue Management. Wu-chang Feng June 23, 2001. Outline. Motivation Congestion control and queue management today (TCP, Drop-tail, RED) Blue Conclusion. Motivation. Exponential increase in network demand Rise in packet loss rates

shlomo
Download Presentation

Blue: An Alternative Approach to Active Queue Management

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Blue: An Alternative Approach to Active Queue Management Wu-chang Feng June 23, 2001

  2. Outline • Motivation • Congestion control and queue management today (TCP, Drop-tail, RED) • Blue • Conclusion

  3. Motivation • Exponential increase in network demand • Rise in packet loss rates • 17% loss rates reported [Paxson97] • Decrease in link utilization and goodput • Potential for congestion collapse [Jacobson88] • Goal • Queue management algorithms for maximizing network efficiency in times of heavy congestion • 0% packet loss, 100% link utilization, low queuing delay

  4. Congestion control today • TCP • Instrumental in preventing congestion collapse • Limits transmission rate at the source • Window-based rate control • Increased and decreased based on implicit signals from the network (acknowledgments and packet loss) • Slow-start • Fast-retransmit, Fast-recovery • Congestion avoidance

  5. Drop-tail queue management • Default queue management mechanism • Packets dropped upon queue overflow • Problems • Global synchrony (poor utilization) • Late congestion notification (packet loss) • Solution • Randomize • Early detection of incipient congestion

  6. RED queue management • RED (Random Early Detection) [Floyd93] • Keep EWMA of queue length (Qave) using weight wq • Increase in EWMA triggers random drops • Basic algorithm 1 Pdrop maxp 0 maxth minth Qave

  7. Problems with RED • Hard to tune • Does not adapt well to traffic • [Feng99], [Anjum99], [Christiansen2000], [May99], [Ott99], …. • Why? • Wrong control variable being used • Queue length indicates congestion not severity

  8. Blue • Class of fundamentally different queue management algorithms • Decouple congestion management from queue length • Rely only on queue and link history • Example • Increase aggressiveness when loss rates high • Decrease aggressiveness when link underutilized

  9. Sending rate increases above L Mbs Sinks generate DupACKs/ECN DupACKs/ECN travel back Rate > L Mbs Rate > L Mbs Rate > L Mbs Rate > L Mbs Sources detect congestion Sources see sustained CN Rate < L Mbs Queue increases Queue increases, EWMA increases to trigger RED Queue increases some more Queue increases some more Queue overflows, maxth triggered Queue clears, but under-utilization imminent RED example L Mbs Sources Sinks A B

  10. Ideal example (Blue) L Mbs Sources Sinks A B Sinks generate DupACKs/ECN Rate = L Mbs Queue drops and/or ECN marks at steady rate Rate = Exactly what will keep sources at L Mbs

  11. Example Blue algorithm • Single dropping/marking probability • Increase upon packet loss • Decrease when link underutilized • Freeze value upon changing Upon packet loss: if ((now - last_update) > freeze_time) then Pmark = Pmark + d1 last_update = now Upon link idle: if ((now - last_update) > freeze_time) then Pmark = Pmark - d2 last_update = now

  12. Blue parameter selection • freeze_time: set to prevent multiple updates on a single round-trip (~10ms-100ms) • d1/d2: set to allow pm to range from 0 to 1 on the order of seconds • [Paxson97], [Balakrishnan98]

  13. Evaluation • 1000 and 4000 Pareto on/off TCP sources • Router queue sizes 100KB (17.8ms) to 1000KB (178ms) • RED (wq = 0.0002, 0.002, 0.02, 0.2) • Blue • freeze_time = 10ms, 100ms • d1 = 0.02, 0.0025 ; d2 = 0.002, 0.00025 100 Mbs 100 Mbs 45 Mbs 45 Mbs 10ms 10ms 1ms, 5ms, 20ms 1ms, 5ms, 20ms

  14. Blue evaluation • 1000 sources

  15. Blue evaluation • 4000 sources

  16. Understanding Blue • Experiment • 50 sources added every 10 seconds • Queue length plots Blue RED

  17. Understanding Blue • Marking behavior RED Blue

  18. Understanding Blue w/ECN timeouts • Lack of ECN timeouts allows packet loss with pm=1 • With ECN timeouts Blue similarly outperforms RED RED Blue

  19. Understanding Blue w/ECN timeouts • Marking behavior RED Blue

  20. Blue evaluation w/ECN timeouts • 1000 sources

  21. Blue evaluation w/ECN timeouts • 4000 sources

  22. Implementation • FreeBSD 2.2.7 + ALTQ IBM PC 365 (200 MHz/64 MB) Winbook XL (233 MHz/32 MB) 100 Mbs 10 Mbs 100 Mbs Intellistation Mpro (400 MHz/128 MB) Intellistation Zpro (200 MHz/64 MB) Thinkpad 770 (266 MHz/64 MB) IBM PC 360 (150 MHz/64 MB)

  23. Blue Evaluation Loss rates Link utilization

  24. Conclusion

More Related