1 / 12

2004 년도 대한토목학회 학술발표회

2004 년도 대한토목학회 학술발표회. Experimental Comparison of Structural Damage Detection Methods. 임현우 , 한국과학기술원 건설및환경공학과 석사과정 문영종 , 한국과학기술원 건설및환경공학과 박사과정 이종헌 , 경일대학교 토목환경공학과 교수 이인원 , 한국과학기술원 건설 및 환경공학과 교수. Introduction.

shoushan-mccoy
Download Presentation

2004 년도 대한토목학회 학술발표회

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 2004년도 대한토목학회 학술발표회 Experimental Comparison of Structural Damage Detection Methods 임현우, 한국과학기술원 건설및환경공학과 석사과정 문영종, 한국과학기술원 건설및환경공학과 박사과정 이종헌, 경일대학교 토목환경공학과 교수 이인원, 한국과학기술원 건설 및 환경공학과 교수

  2. Introduction • Damage detection becomes a very important issue and, there are a lot of evaluation methods in this field. • Experimental investigation was planed for comparison of some of these various methods. • Aluminum cantilever beams are used for comparison of time, frequency domain and mode shape method. • Experiment is focused on the applicability of the three methods in practical situations. Structural Dynamics & Vibration Control Lab., KAIST, Korea

  3. 0.4cm 4cm 60cm aluminum beam • Experimental setup • Equipment • - FFT analyzer ( B&K ) • - impact hammer ( PCB ) • - accelerometer ( B&K ) • - shaker ( YAVETEX ) • Damage case • - size (%) : 5, 10, 20, 30 • - location : 1/4, 2/4, 3/4 Structural Dynamics & Vibration Control Lab., KAIST, Korea

  4. Frequency domain method • Comparison of natural freq. • - measured freq : 1st,2nd,3rd • - damage case : 10, 20, 30% • : 1/4, 2/4, 3/4 Differences in 1st natural freq. Differences in 2nd natural freq. Differences in 3rd natural freq. Structural Dynamics & Vibration Control Lab., KAIST, Korea

  5. FRF based method - where, : undamaged FRF : damaged FRF Damage size 30%, location 1/4 Damage size 30%, location 2/4 Damage size 30%, location 3/4 Structural Dynamics & Vibration Control Lab., KAIST, Korea

  6. Mode shape method • Comparison of mode shape • - measured mode shape : 2nd • - damage case : 10, 20, 30% • : 1/4, 2/4, 3/4 Damage location 1/4 Damage location 2/4 Damage location 3/4 Structural Dynamics & Vibration Control Lab., KAIST, Korea

  7. Wavelet transform • Simulation ( FEM ) • - dimension (cm) : 60×4×0.4 • - no. of element : 240 • - element type : beam Finite element model by MIDAS • Damage • - size (%) : 10, 20, 30 • - location : 1/4, 2/4, 3/4 • - element no. : 60, 120, 180 Damage size 30%, location 2/4 Structural Dynamics & Vibration Control Lab., KAIST, Korea

  8. Mode Shape (MS) • where, : Undamaged mode shape vector • : Damaged mode shape vector • Mode Shape Slope (MSS) • Mode Shape Curvature (MSC) & (MSCS) • , Structural Dynamics & Vibration Control Lab., KAIST, Korea

  9. Simulation : damage case 20%, 1/4 Structural Dynamics & Vibration Control Lab., KAIST, Korea

  10. Time domain method • Wave propagation • - impact at fixed end : 9.8 ms • - 1st arrival at free end : 10.3ms • - reflection from damages : - • - 2nd arrival at free end : 11.1ms Undamaged Damage size 30%, location 1/4 Damage size 30%, location 2/4 Structural Dynamics & Vibration Control Lab., KAIST, Korea

  11. Effect of experimental errors Structural Dynamics & Vibration Control Lab., KAIST, Korea

  12. Conclusions • Under 10% damages can be found by various detection methods with simulation, however it is impossible by experiment because of practical problems. • Not exact location of damages but existence of them can be detected by frequency domain method. • Simulation of mode shape method find even small damages, however its experimental result is insufficient to detect damages. • Time domain method can find the location of relatively large damages. Structural Dynamics & Vibration Control Lab., KAIST, Korea

More Related