160 likes | 291 Views
Remote Connectivity to XA R7/R9 Power-Link & Net-Link. Denise Burns denise.burns@cistech.net (423)235-0673. Agenda. Summary of Remote Connectivity Options Review of Each Option Features Hardware/Software requirements Pros/Cons of Options Demo of each Option
E N D
Remote Connectivity to XA R7/R9 Power-Link & Net-Link Denise Burns denise.burns@cistech.net (423)235-0673
Agenda • Summaryof Remote Connectivity Options • Review of Each Option • Features • Hardware/Software requirements • Pros/Cons of Options • Demo of each Option 5. How We Can Help
Summary of Options Power-Link XA Power-Link to Terminal Server/ Citrix XAX Net-Link
Power-Link direct on WAN • Easiest option if you have enough bandwidth • Depends on number of users, applications, size of database, etc. • Client needs memory, 1 GB minimum • Total network performance is critical • Hubs, switches, cabling, etc. XA
Power-Link direct on WAN Performance can be ‘tweaked’: • Remote fix server • Reduces startup time • Reduces effort to update clients • Utilize preferences to tailor user views and subsets • minimize subsets that bring up all records, i.e. IMHIST , items, orders XA PC Server
Power-Link via Terminal Server XA • Remote user logs into Terminal Server • Terminal Server installed at iSeries location • Faster response time than running Power-Link client remotely • Terminal Services application included in Windows Server operating system • Must buy CAL for each user Terminal Server
Power-Link via Terminal Server XA • Windows Terminal Server with user CAL’s: OS – Windows 2000, 2003 or 2008. Terminal Server CAL’s are approximately $80 each • Power-Link client on Terminal Server requires 100+ MB disk space (each env.) and minimum of 256 MB RAM Terminal Server
Net-Link XA • Faster response time than running Power-Link client over same bandwidth remotely • Auxiliary Server Required: • OS – Windows 2000, 2003 or 2008 • Minimum hardware – P4, 2.8 GHz, 1 GB RAM (more recommended) • Allow 2 GB of memory for every 50 Net-Link users Auxiliary Server
Pros/Cons – Power-Link • Power-Link via Terminal Server • Full functionality of Power-Link software • Additional server required for Terminal Services • Terminal Server CAL required for each user • Approximate cost $80/each If performance is not acceptable with Power-Link:
Pros/Cons - Net-Link • Subset of Power-Link functionality • Probably not appropriate for Power User • Might be fine for limited/inquiry user • Utilizes less bandwidth with faster response time compared to Power-Link • Connection can be through VPN or external address can be set up in firewall for a connection from internet • No additional installation or software licensing required • Requires Auxiliary Server running a set of processes for every 50 Net-Link users
Demonstration: Power-Link Power-Link with Terminal Server Net-Link
How We Can Help • Power-Link via WAN • Install remote fix server • 1 day to implement if server OS is installed • Power-Link via Terminal Server • Install Terminal Server • 1 - 2 days to implement
How We Can Help • Net-Link • Install Auxiliary Server • Assist network administrator with configuration of Net-Link for external access (across internet) • 1 day to implement • Other • Analyze network infrastructure and troubleshoot connectivity problems/performance issues
Questions ?? Thank you!!
Technical Information Denise Burns 423-235-0673 denise.burns@cistech.net Technical Information Ruth A. Pharr 704.814.0007 ruth.pharr@cistech.net Sales Information Ben McCormick 704.814.0016 ben.mccormick@cistech.net