1 / 12

Hemi-Automated Lamellar Keratoplasty (HALK)

Hemi-Automated Lamellar Keratoplasty (HALK). Leonard Yuen, MD MPH MRCOphth Jodhbir Mehta, FRCS FRCOphth Li Lim, FRCOphth Donald Tan, FRCS FRCOphth SINGAPORE NATIONAL EYE CENTRE (SNEC). The authors have no financial interest in the subject matter of this poster.

sian
Download Presentation

Hemi-Automated Lamellar Keratoplasty (HALK)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Hemi-Automated Lamellar Keratoplasty (HALK) Leonard Yuen, MD MPH MRCOphth Jodhbir Mehta, FRCS FRCOphth Li Lim, FRCOphth Donald Tan, FRCS FRCOphth SINGAPORE NATIONAL EYE CENTRE (SNEC) The authors have no financial interest in the subject matter of this poster

  2. The advantages of Anterior lamellar keratoplasty (ALK)is its lower rejection rate and greater trauma resistance compared to PK, together with a reduced risk of endophthalmitis and expulsive haemorrhage. It is technically more demanding and time consuming, however techniques are constantly evolving with increasingly better outcomes. Microkeratome-assisted lamellar keratoplastyis a well-described technique to prepare both recipient and donor beds which reduces the surgical time and allows the preparation of a smooth graft interface. However corneas with significant topographical abnormalities, areas of elevation or thinning, will be reproduced by the microkeratome when creating the recipient flap. It is therefore limited to patients who have stromal pathologies in the anterior-mid stroma and with regular corneal topographies. Purpose To describe a novel hybrid technique for anterior lamellar keratoplasty in corneas with topographical irregularities

  3. Method • Hemi-Automated Lamellar Keratoplasty (HALK), a combined procedure of manual recipient bed lamellar dissection with an automated donor preparation, was performed on 11 eyes of 11 patients with heterogenous causes of anterior stromal scarring • All 11 eyes had a minimum of 4 months follow up, with a mean of 9 months (median 8, range, 4 – 12 months) * A subset of 5 eyes had longer follow up of >12 months, with a mean of 19 months (median 17, range, 13-26 months)

  4. Demographics Mean age 27.4 years Median 22 (range, 7 – 60)

  5. Results N = 11, mean follow-up time 9 months * Snellen Equivalent

  6. Discussion • Postoperative UCVA improved in 82% of eyes • Postoperative BCVA improved in 64% of eyes • Mean Snellen BCVA achieved was 20/50 (range, 20/25 – 20/100), comparable with other studies achieving 20/60 1 and 20/70 2 three months after conventional ALTK • Postoperative SE was -0.01D • Values between -1.63 and -4.16D have been reported after PK 3,4,5,6 1.Vajpayee RB, Sharma N, Jhanju V, et al. One donor cornea for 3 recipients: a new concept for corneal transplantation surgery. Arch Ophthalmol. 2007 Apr;125(4):552-4. 2. Vajpayee RB, Vasudendra N, Tityal J et al. Automated lamellar therapeutic keratoplasty (ALTK) in the treatment of anterior to mid-stromal corneal pathologies. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2006: 84:771-773. 3. Watson SL, Ramsay A, Dart JKG, et al. Comparison of deep lamellar and penetrating keratoplasty in patients with keratoconus. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:1676-1682. 4. Panda A, Bageshwar LMS, Ray M, et al. Deep lamellar keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty for corneal lesions. Cornea 1999;18:172-175. 5. Kirkness C, Ficker L, Steele AD, et al. The success of penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus. Eye. 1990;4:673-688. 6. Buzard KA, Fundingsland BR. Corneal transplant for keratoconus results in early and late disease. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1997;23:398-406.

  7. Discussion In the subset of 5 eyes with >12months follow-up (mean 19 months): • BCVA improves (p = 0.19) • UCVA improves (p = 0.06) The continuing improvement of BCVA and UCVA over time may suggest corneal remodeling

  8. Discussion Whilst using donor tissue of less stringent quality than for PK, donor corneas previously discarded due to low endothelial cell count but clear good stroma can now be used, maximizing the use of the donor cornea The mean postoperative pachymetry was 593 microns; a thicker postoperative cornea allows additional secondary corneal refractive procedures to be done to enhance visual outcomes

  9. Conclusions HALK is a novel procedure that forms another option in the armamentarium for the treatment of anterior stromal diseases Early results are promising for a heterogenous group of corneal pathologies The main advantages of HALK are: 1. The uniform removal of anterior stromal pathology with an irregular anterior corneal surface from the recipient 2. The ability to customize the size and thickness of the donor grafts resulting in optimal optical and postoperative outcomes

More Related