240 likes | 573 Views
strategy + culture. b alancing your priorities as a communications leader. Central Iowa PRSA Institute November 20, 2013 Dave Remund, Ph.D., APR Drake University. goals. b etter understand communications leadership i dentify pivotal moments u nderstand and apply actionable tips. 1,300.
E N D
strategy + culture balancing your priorities as a communications leader Central Iowa PRSA Institute November 20, 2013 Dave Remund, Ph.D., APR Drake University
goals better understand communications leadership identify pivotal moments understand and apply actionable tips
1,300 exercise
one better understand communications leadership
communications leadership help drive strategy and foster high performance continually adapt to uncertainty economy technology focus on making real progress
responses to uncertainty eliminating tolerating coping accepting embracing
imbalance not everyone is at the same stage at the same time allow time for people to reflect individually as a group
real progress conscious decisions + deliberate choices improvements = legitimately sustainable
incremental improvements real progress? temporary, yet often treated as permanent momentarily stable, yet eventually irrelevant
two identify pivotal moments
pivotal moments vision alignment execution
coaching for high performance VISION: embracing ALIGNMENT: adapting + learning EXECUTION: performing
coaching for progress incremental improvement maker real progress maker focus coaster explorer flexibility
well-led organization quality customer service driven by strategy, technology, HR and PR supported by strong training and management
three understand and apply actionable tips
strategic leadership build partnerships intently (e.g. iTunes, apps, etc.) moderate the influence of status and roles help accelerate progress, whenever possible
everyday leadership maximize critical thinking devote energy to those who enrich ideas
critical thinking what might be the implications? what are the underlying issues/trends? have we made reasonable assumptions? do we have reasonable data to reach our conclusions? how will we define effectiveness? have we considered all logical alternatives? have we considered the ethical impact(s)?
communication protocol what is the decision? how was the decision made? why was the decision made? what were the rejected alternatives? how does the decision fit the vision? how does decision affect the organization? how does decision affect the employees?
engagement goals informing educating/clarifying coordinating/integrating training/demonstrating inspiring/influencing relating/recognizing
thanks much let me know if there is anything you would like to discuss Dave Remund, Ph.D., APR Drake University Phone: 515.271.3083 Email: david.remund@drake.edu Twitter: @remund