280 likes | 381 Views
Rule Development Workshop School Grades FCAT Writing Standard. Rule - 6A-1.09981 August 24, 27, and 28th 2012. Florida Department of Education. School Grades Basic Model Assessment-Based Measures Included in School Grades for All School Types. 50%. 50%. Writing Component.
E N D
Rule Development WorkshopSchool Grades FCAT Writing Standard Rule - 6A-1.09981 August 24, 27, and 28th 2012 Florida Department of Education
School Grades Basic ModelAssessment-Based Measures Included in School Grades for All School Types 50% 50%
Writing Component • Schools earn points for the percentage of students who meet or exceed the performance standard. • Example: If 75% of students meet the standard then the school receives 75 points for this component • Maximum 100 points
2012 Changes to FCAT Writing Responses were scored holistically as draft writing, but scoring decisions included expanded expectations regarding the following: • Increased attention to the correct use of standard English conventions, which had been scored with leniency in the past • Increased attention to the quality of details -requiring the use of relevant, logical, and plausible support in responses earning high scores
2013 FCAT 2.0 Writing • With the increases in the scoring expectations educators requested that the time for the assessment be increased • The time available for the assessment will increase from 45 to 60 minutes in 2013
School Grade Standards for Writing • May 2012: SBE adopted an emergency rule setting the writing standard for 2012 school grades at 3.0 • October 2012: SBE will review the school grade writing standard, currently 4.0 in rule
Writing Content Advisory Committee • Comprised of Florida educators • Identified the example papers (anchor papers) used to define the writing expected at each score point from 1 to 6 for each grade level
Writing Reactor Panel • Reviewed the test design, anchor papers, and expectations • Composition • Superintendents • Teachers • Student • Postsecondary institutions • Businesses • Community organizations
Writing Reactor Panel • Provided two recommendations • Based on content mastery that should be expected of students • Based on both content mastery that should be expected balanced with the current level of student achievement
Writing Reactor Panel Content Based Judgment
Writing Reactor PanelContent Based Judgment Informed by Impact Data
Impact Data • Based on 2012 results • Actual data in 2013 may be different • Changes in student performance • Increased time allowed for the assessment
FCAT Writing Impact on School Grades Change in Average Points Earned with Change in FCAT Writing Standard 14
FCAT Writing Impact on School Grades Charts Showing: • Current Distribution of the Actual 2012 School Grades (Not Including High Schools) with FCAT Writing standard set at “3.0 and Above” -- Blue Bars • Distribution of the 2012 School Grades with FCAT Writing standard at “3.5 and Above” - Red Bars • Distribution of the 2012 School Grades with FCAT Writing standard at “4.0 and Above” - Green Bars • High schools are not included in the graphs on grade changes as they do not have grades yet for 2012 as some of the information needed is not yet available 15
FCAT Writing Impact on School Grades All Graded Schools - Counts (Not Including High Schools with Pending Grades) 16
FCAT Writing Impact on School Grades All Graded Schools - Percents (Not Including High Schools with Pending Grades) 17
FCAT Writing Impact on School Grades Elementary Schools - Counts 18
FCAT Writing Impact on School Grades Elementary Schools - Percents 19
FCAT Writing Impact on School Grades Middle Schools - Counts 20
FCAT Writing Impact on School Grades Middle Schools - Percents 21
FCAT Writing Impact on School Grades Combination Schools - Counts (Not Including High Schools with Pending Grades) 22
FCAT Writing Impact on School Grades Combination Schools - Percents (Not Including High Schools with Pending Grades) 23
FCAT Writing Impact on School Grades Impact on the School Grade Distribution for 2012 if the FCAT Writing Standard Were Changed to "3.5 and Above“ Net Change in Number and Percent of Schools Receiving each Grade * Includes only high schools not currently graded "pending." 24
FCAT Writing Impact on School Grades Impact on the School Grade Distribution for 2012 if the FCAT Writing Standard Were Changed to “4.0 and Above“ Net Change in Number and Percent of Schools Receiving each Grade * Includes only high schools not currently graded "pending." 25
FCAT Writing Impact on School GradesHigh School Assessment Points – Count of Schools in Each Range For High Schools with Pending Grades
FCAT Writing Impact on School Grades High School Assessment Points – Percent of Schools in Each Range For High Schools with Pending Grades
Contact Information and Resources Questions about Florida school grading or other accountability processes? See information resources and guides at http://schoolgrades.fldoe.org/ . Contact the Bureau of Accountability Reporting at (850) 245-0411 or evalnrpt@fldoe.org 28 Accountability Research and Measurement