1 / 17

Using discourse measures to describe aphasia

Using discourse measures to describe aphasia. Alison Ferguson. Fluent ‘Empty speech’ Press of speech Phonemic paraphasias Neologisms Jargon Paragrammatism. Non-Fluent Content > function words Effortful ‘telegraphic’ Agrammatism. Describing aphasic output.

sikesj
Download Presentation

Using discourse measures to describe aphasia

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Using discourse measures to describe aphasia Alison Ferguson

  2. Fluent ‘Empty speech’ Press of speech Phonemic paraphasias Neologisms Jargon Paragrammatism Non-Fluent Content > function words Effortful ‘telegraphic’ Agrammatism Describing aphasic output Information proportional to fluency

  3. Why ‘measure’? • Prognosis • Recovery • Response to treatment Social Participation Impairment Activity

  4. Assessment Methods Decontextualised CONTEXT Context manipulated

  5. Assessment Methods Elicited SAMPLE Natural

  6. Assessment Methods word, phrase, clause LEVEL OF LANGUAGE discourse

  7. Assessment Methods quantitative DESCRIPTION qualitative

  8. Basic discourse measures

  9. Systematic Analysis of Language Transcripts – V.8 (Miller, 2004)

  10. Automatised analyses

  11. Example of Automatised Analysis

  12. Preliminary outcomes

  13. Fluent vs Non-FluentGrammatical Intricacy

  14. Fluent vs Non-fluentEfficiency ( Complete & Intelligible Utterances per min)

  15. Concurrent validity – TTR & communicative effectiveness

  16. Basic discourse measures

More Related