280 likes | 410 Views
Agenda. Final Modal Assignments Prioritization Supporting Network Financial Analysis. Winter Park. SunRail. US 192. 22 Corridors. US 192. Silver Star Rd. Sanford. Innovation Way. US 17-92. US 17-92. SR 436. SR 436. US 441. US 441/17-92. US 441/17-92. SR 50. John Young Pkwy.
E N D
Agenda • Final Modal Assignments • Prioritization • Supporting Network • Financial Analysis
Winter Park SunRail US 192 22 Corridors US 192 Silver Star Rd Sanford Innovation Way US 17-92 US 17-92 SR 436 SR 436 US 441 US 441/17-92 US 441/17-92 SR 50 John Young Pkwy Orange Ave Kirkman Rd SR 528 SR 434 Aloma Ave Maitland Blvd High Speed Rail Seminole Way
Methodology Overview Step 1 Segment Identification Step 1 Segment Identification Step 2 Segment Potential Step 2 Segment Potential Step 3 Corridor Prioritization Step 3 Corridor Prioritization · Transit Demand · Traffic Conditions · Roadway Improvements · Compatibility · Population Density · Employment Density · Land Use · Area Type · User Market · Accessibility · Transit Orientation · Activity Centers · Average Trip Length · Existing Transit Ridership · Right-of-Way Availability
2030 TOD* Modal Assignments • Local Bus • Enhanced Express Bus • Bus Rapid Transit - Exclusive • Bus Rapid Transit - Mixed • Light Rail • Streetcar • SunRail • High Speed Rail * Consistent with MetroPlan’s adopted alternative land use plan
Prioritization Methodology Overview • Mode prioritization by segment • Cost identification by segment • Cost vs. available revenue comparison • Identification of financially feasible service • Network compatibility adjustments • Policy adjustments • Network compatibility adjustments • Supporting network identification
Mode Prioritization by Segment Linear Interpolation Existing Conditions Score 2015 Score 2020 Score 2025 Score 2030 Conditions Score • Segment zz • Segment dd • Segment ee • … • Segment aa • Segment cc • Segment xx • … • Segment aa • Segment cc • Segment xx • … • Segment bb • Segment yy • Segment zz • … • Segment dd • Segment aa • Segment ff • … Funding Cut-off
2015 TOD Modal Assignments • Local Bus • Enhanced Express Bus • Bus Rapid Transit - Exclusive • Bus Rapid Transit - Mixed • Light Rail • Streetcar • SunRail • High Speed Rail
2020 TOD Modal Assignments • Local Bus • Enhanced Express Bus • Bus Rapid Transit - Exclusive • Bus Rapid Transit - Mixed • Light Rail • Streetcar • SunRail • High Speed Rail
2025 TOD Modal Assignments • Local Bus • Enhanced Express Bus • Bus Rapid Transit - Exclusive • Bus Rapid Transit - Mixed • Light Rail • Streetcar • SunRail • High Speed Rail
2030 TOD Modal Assignments • Local Bus • Enhanced Express Bus • Bus Rapid Transit - Exclusive • Bus Rapid Transit - Mixed • Light Rail • Streetcar • SunRail • High Speed Rail
LRTP Transit Cost Feasible Plan I-Drive to Medical City/ Innovation Way LRT US 441 to Apopka US 17/92 north of Winter Park Pine Hills Road Medical City/Innovation Way to UCF BRT
LRTP and Vision 2030 Differences • Compilation of findings from different studies • Different corridor set • Varying age of data • Different methodologies • Policy decisions • Corridor versus network approach
Supporting Network • Review of supporting local bus network • Improve frequencies of current routes • 30 minutes on most routes • 15 minutes on some routes • Addition of community connectors and flex-route circulators
Supporting Network • Community Connectors • Circulates on specific route • Makes frequent stops at bus stops • Flex-Route Circulators • Operates in a specified area • Circulates on a specific route but deviates within service area when requested
2030 Community Connectors and Flex-Route Circulators Sanford Heathrow Zellwood Maitland Colonial Town Winter Garden Goldenrod Orlovista Conway John Young Parkway S • Local Bus • Enhanced Express • Bus Rapid Transit - Exclusive • Bus Rapid Transit - Mixed • Light Rail • Streetcar • SunRail • High Speed Rail • Community Connector • Flex-Route Circulator Orange Ave S Poinciana
Financial Analysis • Expanded LYNX short-range model • Developed cost and revenue growth rate assumptions • Evaluated future funding needs based on existing conditions • Analyzed impact of potential supplemental revenue sources
Operating Costs & Potential Revenues 2015 2020 2025 2030
Near-Term Recommendations • Work with MetroPlan to ensure LYNX Vision 2030 is incorporated into 2040 LRTP update • Meet with local jurisdictions and MetroPlan Land Use Subcommittee to discuss how localities can make adopted LRTP land use plan a reality • Need to ensure changes do not create disproportionate adverse impacts to under-represented individuals
Near-Term Recommendations • Explore options for dedicated/supplementary funding for transit • Develop and implement bicycle- and pedestrian-friendly land use policies • Continue coordination and discussions with stakeholders (i.e., Disney, OIA, UCF, etc.)
Mid-Term Recommendations • Update the plan on a regular basis • Identify additional corridors for inclusion in next update • Work with counties and municipalities to develop transit-supportive growth plans • Develop transit-supportive corridor plans • Undertake individual corridor studies to identify better termini, operational improvements, and implementation plan
Mid-Term Recommendations • Study the possibility of implementing Limited Stop Connector Service • Secure dedicated funding source for transit • Identify locations for park-and-ride lots • Continue coordination and discussions with stakeholders (i.e., Disney, OIA, UCF, etc.)
Long-Term Recommendations • Changing conditions will need to be monitored (i.e., Medical City/Innovation Way development, HSR, etc.) • Continue coordination and discussions with stakeholders (i.e., Disney, OIA, UCF, etc.)
Questions or Comments Thank you