1 / 6

Panel Discussion Real Lethality — Learning from After Action Reports

Join this panel discussion focused on small arms lethality and effectiveness. Discover repeatable observations, address concerns, and explore emerging recommendations to enhance capability. Gain insights into weapon design, ammunition performance, engagement ranges, and more.

simoni
Download Presentation

Panel Discussion Real Lethality — Learning from After Action Reports

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Panel Discussion • Real Lethality — Learning fromAfter Action Reports

  2. Session V: Real Lethality – Learning from After Action Reports • Session Moderator:Mr. Dave Broden, Alliant Techsystems • 5:50 p.m. Introduction Presentation • AA53, Cartridge, Caliber 5.56mm Special Ball, Long Range Mk 262 Mod 0 • Mr. Charles Buxton and Mr. Chuck Marsh, Naval Surface Warfare Center, • Crane Division • Guest Panel • Mr. Dennis Conway, U.S. Army TACOM-ARDEC • Mr. Charles Buxton, Naval Surface Warfare Center • LTC Rob Carpenter, USA, PM for Crew Served Weapons • Mr. Rich Audette, U.S. Army TACOM-ARDEC • Mr. Reed Knight, Knights Armaments Inc. • Hays Parks, Department of Army • Lew Farkas, AMSAA

  3. Guest Panel • Mr. Dennis Conway, U.S. Army TACOM-ARDEC • Mr. Charles Buxton, Naval Surface Warfare Center • LTC Rob Carpenter, USA, PM for Crew Served Weapons • Mr. Rich Audette, U.S. Army TACOM-ARDEC • Mr. Reed Knight, Knights Armaments Inc. • Hays Parks, Department of Army • Lew Farkas, AMSAA

  4. Panel Discussion Format • Outline panel topic focus • Each panel members address topic £ 5 minutes • Panel discussions among members • Response to written questions • Open questions • Summary/wrap-up “After Action Reports — Lessons Learned” Addressing Small Arms Lethality/Effectiveness Enhancing the Capability – How – Benefit

  5. Panel Topics • After Action Observations • Are Observations Repeatable or Random? • Concerns Identified • What Has Been Done to Address Concerns? • Analysis Approach • Test Approach • Emerging/Evolving Recommendations

  6. Panel Topics • Observation Area • Weapon(s) • Barrel(s) • Rifling • Ammunition • Projectile • Design • Performance • Caliber • Engagement/Operational Ranges • Target Conditions • Protected • Body Armor • Other • Effectiveness • Data Based • Methodology • Criteria

More Related