1 / 23

PIA Review

PIA Review. Fall 2000. PIA Team Reviews Your 471 to Assure Compliance with FCC Rules Regarding:. Eligibility of entities Appropriateness of discounts Eligibility of services Services delivered in funding year Proper posting of 470

siran
Download Presentation

PIA Review

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. PIA Review Fall 2000

  2. PIA Team Reviews Your 471 to Assure Compliance with FCC Rules Regarding: • Eligibility of entities • Appropriateness of discounts • Eligibility of services • Services delivered in funding year • Proper posting of 470 • Allowable Vendor Selection/Contract Date vs. Contract Award Date, 471 Signature/ Submission Date

  3. PIA Reviews(Cont’d.) • Scope of work - all entities to receive service listed • True competitive process • If contract voluntarily extended, complied with posting requirements • Presence of contract (or legally binding agreement)

  4. PIA Reviews(cont’d.) • “High risk” reviews • Adequacy of support resources • Consortium has “knowing” participants

  5. Documentation Needed by the PIA Team • Eligibility of entities - state DOE letter, letter of accreditation • Discount - NSLP report to state, summary of student survey results • Services • Detailed list of products with associated prices that add up to funding request • Maintenance request showing equipment being maintained

  6. Documentation Needed(Cont’d.) • Copies of bills if ongoing service • Quote sheet from service provider if new tariff or month-to-month service -- and explanation if request exceeds documented costs • Itemized details of one-time costs associated with Internet access or telecommunications services • State master contract -- contract number and the contract expiration date

  7. Documentation Needed(Cont’d.) • Number of phone lines and/or cell phones receiving service and information about their use, if any will be used for other than educational purposes • If ineligible use, allocation of costs (percent) among eligible and ineligible • Contract in some cases

  8. Documentation Needed(Cont’d.) • Adequacy of support resources • Budget information, this year and next • List of what’s in place (training already done, electrical upgrade, warranties or maintenance contracts) • Consortium • Signed documentation for all entities - letters of agency, project agreement

  9. Top Denial Reasons • Form 470 not posted for service type requested • Form 470 not filed for new services requested • Application signed or submitted and/or contract signed prior to 28-day Form 470 posting period

  10. Top Denial Reasons(Cont’d.) • Ineligible services ³ 30% in a funding request (threshold subject to change) • No response to request for additional information required for review within 7 days (after multiple attempts to reach applicant) • No technology plan in place (when required)

  11. Top Denial Reasons(Cont’d.) • Discount % under internal connections funding threshold

  12. Eligible Services • Check Eligible Services List from SLD Web Site • Service categories important -- Priority 1 versus Priority 2 -- don’t mix them up • Who can be service provider? • Basic phone service (no tech plan) • Local, Long distance, Cell, Fax • If not certain and you have no tech plan, call CSB • Be careful: voice mail, directory advertising, unpublished number ineligible

  13. Eligible Services (Cont’d.) • Principles • Costs to get information to classroom generally eligible -- end-user equipment (e.g, telephone, PC) not eligible • Telecommunications (including video service) must be from eligible telecommunication provider, i.e., provides service on a common carriage basis

  14. Eligible Services (Cont’d.) • WAN eligible only if leased from service provider -- recent clarification on PIA procedures: we don’t deny for internal connections to a WAN • LAN is internal connections • Service provider equipment on customer premises is Priority 1 if: • Service provider owns • Customer does not use for any other purpose • Customer’s LAN functions without it

  15. Eligible Services (Cont’d.) • Amortization of service provider equipment. FCC does not want to deplete USF by full up-front purchase of service provider infrastructure - Brooklyn Public Library decision • Use is important - must be for educational purposes • Paging & phone service eligible if eligible use • Prepaid Calling cards -- ineligible because no assurance of eligible use • Remote access router -- cannot be used remotely

  16. 470 vis a vis 471 • If new contract or T or MTM, must post 470 for 28 days before: • Selecting vendor • Signing contract • Signing 471 • Submitting 471 • Posting occurs when data entry is complete

  17. 470 vis a vis 471(Cont’d.) • Allowable Vendor Selection/Contract Date is on 470 RNL • Don’t count it yourself. Don’t assume when your mailed form got posted. Use the 470 RNL. • Must post for correct service category • Must indicate correct scope of work • Can’t extend contract for longer than term suggested in RFP • Be careful entering Form 470 Application #

  18. “High Risk” Reviews • High unit cost • Concern about free ineligible services paid for through inflated prices on eligible services • Sometimes leads to identification of vendors that have not been selected through a truly competitive process • Adequacy of support resources -- Item 25 certification • Matching share

  19. “High Risk” Reviews (Cont’d.) • E-rate ineligible items - end-user equipment, training, maintenance, electrical capacity, software • If applicant can’t demonstrate resources, we must deny although FCC directed us to to take a separate look at basic telephone service • Especially important here to be ready to provide documentation that PIA is seeking

  20. “High Risk” Reviews (Cont’d.) • Consortium • Applicant certifies that entities it represents have secured access • Must have documentation that members know • Consortium applicant is responsible for documentation to show adequacy of entities’ support resources

  21. Form 471 Certifications • Certifications that • Schools and libraries • are eligible • have secured access to necessary support resources to make effective use of discounts • are covered by technology plans if required • complied with all applicable state and local procurement laws

  22. Form 471 Certifications(Cont’d.) • will use discounted services solely for educational purposes and will not resell • have complied with all program rules (e.g., most cost-effective choice of vendor with price primary factor) • Applicant • will ensure most disadvantaged schools and libraries in shared discount calculation receive an appropriate share of services

  23. Form 471 Certifications(Cont’d.) • recognizes it may be audited and will retain documentation for five years • is authorized to submit request on behalf of named entities

More Related