240 likes | 520 Views
Pharmacovigilance obligations of the Pharmaceutical companies in India Dr.Sumedh M.Gaikwad MD,DM Clinical Pharmacology, Director Medical Services, Richter Themis Medicare Ltd. Introduction
E N D
1/20 Pharmacovigilance obligations of the Pharmaceutical companies in India Dr.Sumedh M.Gaikwad MD,DM Clinical Pharmacology, Director Medical Services, Richter Themis Medicare Ltd.
Introduction • Regulations Relating to PV in India • National PV program • PV activities for Generic Drugs in India • Management of Safety Database • Safety Reporting During Clinical Trials • PV obligations of Indian Companies with Subsidiaries Abroad • Conclusion
Introduction • Regulatory decision to approve new drug based on benefit & risk • Status of Indian Pharma Market for introduction of new drug • Change in scenario • Govt. efforts • PV obligations Pharma Companies
Regulations Relating to PV in India • Pharmaceutical company & PV System -In House -Outsourced to CROs • Schedule-Y -Define responsibilities of Pharma company to ensure adequate compliance of PV obligations -PMS
National PV program • Nation-wide program (CDSCO) • Major functions: -Monitoring of spontaneous ADRs -Review of the PSURs submitted by Pharma companies -Assessing safety information for product label amendments, product withdrawals & suspension. • Limited guidance in Schedule-Y & protocol by NPP
PV activities for Generic Drugs in India PV obligations of Generic Company in India: -Collection, monitoring, & reporting of spontaneous adverse reaction reports -Preparation of PSURs -Expectations: *To develop adequate systems & expertise for literature searches, management of safety data, signal detection,& risk-benefit analysis of its marketed products
Spontaneous ADRs • Spontaneous reporting of ADRs-an important tool: -to gather safety information required for early signal detection -to conduct risk-benefit analysis of new drugs • Schedule-Y specifications -SUSAR: report within 15 days of initial of information & all available clinical information related to reaction - Individual ADRs included in next PSUR & not in an urgent manner Limitations: -Details regarding capture, evaluation & FU of ADRs not addressed * Guidance doc. from ICH E2D referred to develop detailed procedures for handling of spontaneous AEs
Guidance doc. from ICH E2D referred to develop detailed procedures for handling of spontaneous AEs: • Procedure includes defining minimum four criteria to validate the adverse reaction reports • Collection of relevant info. for spontaneous adverse reactions • Handling of the reports received from patients or their relatives • Evaluation of the spontaneous ARs, for their seriousness & listedness/expectedness • FU of spontaneous ARs reports, minimum FUs required, close out of the case etc.
Management of Safety Database No guidelines available from Indian regulators regarding management of safety data or maintenance & update of Company Core Data Sheet or Safety Information
Current Practice : All the data collected during literature searches, spontaneous adverse event reports, clinical & non clinical studies or from all the sources are collected & saved in the product safety file
Signal Detection: -all the safety data collected should be evaluated -if trend becomes apparent, necessary action should be initiated Problems: -Unique Medical Practices in India -High prevalence of polypharmacy -Pharmaceutical market in India is not well regulated
Problems… -lack of relevant data on spontaneous ADR reports -unavailability of the trained staff for signal detection -lack of the push/drive from the regulatory agency • Solution: -Generic drug companies in a country like India should have strong system & expertise for signal detection # Generally, Indian generic companies follow the global updates of the innovator’s label
Periodic Safety Update Reports -Important PV tool design to include safety data on a particular drug from all the sources & geographical regions -DCGI recommends a single PSUR for all dosage forms, formulations & indication for one active substance. -License holders are expected to include summary information along with the critical evaluation of the safety profile of a marketed drug in a light of a new changes during post authorization period.
Formats & reporting in PSURs -Formats provided in Schedule-Y is similar to ICH E2C format • Reporting Cycle: - All new products, every 6 months for initial 2 years & then annually for next 2 years - Reports due for a period must be submitted within 30 calendar days from the last day of reporting period.
Safety Reporting During Clinical Trials • Sponsors Responsibility • Investigators Responsibility • Limitations of Schedule-Y : - does not specify rules regarding the reporting of foreign cases from multinational trials -lacks further details on the procedures for unblinding, coding etc -handling of the AEs associated with placebo or comparator drugs
PV obligations of Indian Companies with Subsidiaries Abroad • Schedule-Y: do not specify anything regarding the expedited reporting of SAR from other countries • Eudralex Volume 9A-Guidelines on PV for Medicinal Products for Human Use, clearly specifies the requirement for reporting of foreign cases & case reports from literature searches
Solution: -Indian companies with subsidiaries in Europe; to establish & maintain the safety databases for their products in India & centralize the PV activities such as *literature searches *generation of CIOMS forms *signal detection * risk-benefit analysis *preparation of PSURs in India & QPPV locally in Europe for regulatory interactions
Conclusion • In the past; never a compulsion to have a strong PV system to detect ADR of the marketed drugs • Presently; increased interest of Indian regulatory authority for PV activities • Limitations: -limited guidance available in Schedule-Y as well as protocol published by the NPP
Conclusion…. • Challenges faced by the Pharma companies in India: - Low level of reporting spontaneous ADRs - Lack of training of GPs on drug safety & ADR reporting - Non availability of staff trained in PV - Lack of guidance from the Indian regulatory authority due to the lack of expertise & experience.