1 / 20

Beam-Beam interaction SIMulation: GUINEA-PIG

Beam-Beam interaction SIMulation: GUINEA-PIG. CARE 05, Geneva, November 2005. C. Rimbault, LAL Orsay. Beam-Beam interaction SIMulation : GUINEA-PIG. 1. Introduction: BBSIM tasks overview 2. Incoherent e + e - pair background study BBSIMs predictions: GUINEA-PIG Vs CAIN

skah
Download Presentation

Beam-Beam interaction SIMulation: GUINEA-PIG

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Beam-Beam interaction SIMulation: GUINEA-PIG CARE 05, Geneva, November 2005 C. Rimbault, LAL Orsay

  2. Beam-Beam interaction SIMulation :GUINEA-PIG • 1. Introduction: BBSIM tasks overview • 2. Incoherent e+e- pair background study • BBSIMs predictions: GUINEA-PIG Vs CAIN • Impact of beam parameter sets on microVertex Detector background • 3. In progress: Bhabhas in GUINEA-PIG

  3. Beam-Beam SIMulation • When beams collide: • Energy loss in the form of synchrotron radiation: beamstrahlung • Secondary backgrounds • Electromagnetic : e+ + e-→ gg → e+e- … • Hadronic : e+ + e-→ gg → hadrons • Electromagnetic deflections • effect on backgrounds (pairs ...) • effect on luminosity measurements ? (Bhabha scattering) • e+ e- spin depolarisation effects • GUINEA-PIG check-up & benchmarking • Comparison with simulation codes • General Beam-Beam interactions: CAIN • Dedicated codes: BDK, BHLUMI ... • Improvement, adding new options/ phenomena • Management (Web doc, version updating...)

  4. Incoherent Pair Creation Processes x-section exact calculation Weizäcker-Williams approximation 1. Breit-Wheeler :gg-> e+e- 2. Bethe-Heitler : ge±-> e± e+e- 3. Landau-Lifshitz : e+e-->e+e- e+e- Equivalent photon spectrum, associated to a virtuality parameter, Q Simulation inputs GuineaPig&Cain: Tracking1, Beam Size Effect2 , Q2max=s/4,me2 BDK: e+e-  e+e-e+e-, smin= 4me2 used as a reference for the LL process Emin= 5 MeV ; Beam parameter set: USSC 500 GeV ; VD: r1=15mm, B=4T (LDC) 1Tracking : Deflection of low energy pairs due to the field of the opposite beam. 2Beam Size Effect: Reduction of cross section due to the position uncertainty for the virtual photons with low Pt.

  5. Deflection of the pairs Pt vs q GuineaPig After Deflection Before Deflection Pt > 5 MeV/c mostly due to electromagnetic deflections

  6. GuineaPig /CAIN Energy spectra BW BHLL Qualitative agreement between Guinea-Pig and CAIN Phase space Pt vs q

  7. Landau-Lifshitz : Comparison with BDK GuineaPig BDK Pt Cain Energy theta No Beam Size Effect, No Deflection Very good agreement forGuinea-PigandBDK

  8. e+ + e- production (effective) cross sections E > 5 MeV without & with Beam Size Effect

  9. e+ + e- production (effective) cross sections E > 5 MeV without & with Beam Size Effect

  10. IPC particles reaching the VD (LDC) Pt vs q Comparison Deflection / No Deflection Pt > 5 MeV & q > 20 mrad VD bkg does not come from magnetic deflection

  11. Events reaching the VD effective s(mb) without & with Beam Size Effect

  12. Events reaching the VD effective s(mb) Where does the difference between GUINEA-PIG and CAIN comes from ? without & with Beam Size Effect

  13. Origin of the difference GuineaPig / CAIN : Q2max Same virtuality limit, same results : agreement between GP & CAIN at low virtuality Is it correct to choose s/4 as the virtuality upper limit ?

  14. The photon virtuality spectrum in BDK Qg1 Vs Qg2 - BDK Virtuality spectrum 24% GuineaPig BDK 67% me Nice agreement between GuineaPig & BDK both at low and large virtuality BKD prediction at low virtuality: sprod= 24 mb ; sVD = 12 mb ~CAIN results

  15. Impact of beam parameter sets on VD backgroundfor r1 = 15 mm Nominal Low Power Pairs reaching the VD for an inner layer radius of 15 mm and different magnetic fields: 216 mb88 mb 59 mb 39 mb 145 mb 77 mb 50 mb Pt (GeV/c) Pt (GeV/c) for B=2T + + + for B=3T + + for B=4T + for B=5T q (rad) q (rad) Pairs deflection limit for Nominal option: for the Low Power option this limit is higher !  too close to the background inflation region • A careful choice is required for Low Power option: • Incompatibility with Vertex Detector designs at low B and small radius • 2T: not safe with ri = 15 mm

  16. Bhabha scattering & electromagnetic deflections e+ e+ e+ e+ + + ... g g e- e- e- e- • Bhabhas are used to measure the luminosity: Lint= NBhabha/sBhabha • Bhabha cross section : • Beam-Beam effectEM deflections •  Modification of the angular distribution ? •  Modification of the theoretical cross section ? •  Would it be possible to estimate Lwith DL/L < 10-4 ?

  17. Bhabha scattering & electromagnetic deflections: VeryPrelimary results • 106 Bhabhas produced with BHLUMI, √s=500 GeV, 25≤q ≤90 mrad: • GUINEA-PIG EM deflection treatment (same as for the e+e- pairs) • for the analysis : 30≤q ≤75 mrad, no cut on energy Effect of the deflection on angles (qx1-qx0) (mrad) (qy1-qy0) (mrad) (q1-q0) (mrad)

  18. Bhabha scattering & electromagnetic deflections: Verypreliminary results • 106 Bhabhas produced with BHLUMI, √s=500 GeV, 25≤q ≤90 mrad: • GUINEA-PIG EM deflection treatment (same as for the e+e- pairs) • for the analysis : 30≤q ≤75 mrad, no cut on energy Effect of the deflection on angles 0.21e-04 0.14e-04 -0.10e-02 (qy1-qy0)/qy0 (10-2) (qx1-qx0)/qx0 (10-2) (q1-q0)/q0 (10-2)

  19. Bhabha scattering & electromagnetic deflections: Verypreliminary results NBh bef. def. = 41815 NBh added by def. = 14 NBh suppressed by def. = 206 q1(mrad) q0before deflection q1after deflection q0(mrad) Difference between theoretical and “real” nb of Bhabhas : -0.46%

  20. Summary • Incoherent e+e- pairs • GUINEA-PIG modelisation is more convenient than CAIN: • me is a too small limit for the photon virtuality. • Be careful with pair accumulation region after deflection : • LowPower  constraints on VD design (B, radius, readout) • 2T detector concept needs a VD inner radius >20 mm • reference: EUROTeV-Report-2005-016-1 • First study of EM Deflection effect on Bhabha scattering: • Effect > 10 × 10-4 •  Necessity to know well the impact of EM deflection •  Tool will be provided (BHLUMI + GUINEA-PIG)

More Related