1 / 44

Per-Tone Algorithms for ADSL Transceivers

Per-Tone Algorithms for ADSL Transceivers. PhD-students: Koen Vanbleu, Geert Ysebaert Supervisor: Marc Moonen Email: {moonen, vanbleu, ysebaert}@esat.kuleuven.ac.be Presentation: ftp://ftp.esat.kuleuven.ac.be/sista/ysebaert/presentations/ KULeuven, ESAT SCD-SISTA, Belgium. October 22, 2002.

skah
Download Presentation

Per-Tone Algorithms for ADSL Transceivers

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Per-Tone Algorithms for ADSL Transceivers PhD-students:Koen Vanbleu, Geert Ysebaert Supervisor:Marc Moonen Email:{moonen, vanbleu, ysebaert}@esat.kuleuven.ac.be Presentation:ftp://ftp.esat.kuleuven.ac.be/sista/ysebaert/presentations/ KULeuven, ESAT SCD-SISTA, Belgium October 22, 2002

  2. General Overview • Basic Principles • Per Tone Equalization • Per Tone Echo Cancellation • Per Tone Radio Frequency Interference (RFI) Mitigation • Per Tone Crosstalk Mitigation • Conclusions

  3. Overview • Principles • Equalization • Echo • RFI • Crosstalk • Conclusions • Basic Principles • Introduction • DMT • Transmitter structure • Receiver structure • Cyclic Prefix trick • Data Model

  4. Introduction • Principles • Intro • DMT • Data model • Equalization • Echo • RFI • Crosstalk • Conclusions • Communication at high rates towards customer • telephone wire, cable, fiber, wireless • Communication over telephone wire • Evolution: ever increasing bitrates • E.g. Time to download 10 Mbyte file

  5. Introduction Down Up Line length ADSL 6 Mbps 640 Kbps 3 km VDSL 52 Mbps 6.4 Mbps 300 m Downstream Central Customer Upstream • Principles • Intro • DMT • Data model • Equalization • Echo • RFI • Crosstalk • Conclusions • Broadband communication over telephone line • ADSL (Asymmetric Digital Subscriber Line) • VDSL (Very high bit rate Digital Subscriber Line) • Bitrate is function of the line length

  6. Duplexing e.g. ADSL UP &DOWN POTS UP DOWN POTS DOWN 4 25 138 1104 f (kHz) 4 25 138 1104 f (kHz) • Principles • Intro • DMT • Data model • Equalization • Echo • RFI • Crosstalk • Conclusions • Assign different frequency bins to up- and downstream directions • Frequency Division Duplexing (FDD) • Overlap: Echo Cancellation (EC) • Traditional telephony (POTS) still available over the same wire.

  7. Discrete Multi Tone: Transmitter bits Data symbols (QAM) Cyclic Prefix CP Im 0 10 00 ... ... Re 11 01 2 bits N-point P/S Im IFFT Re ... ... 4 bits IFFT modulation (Inverse Fast Fourier Transform) • Principles • Intro • DMT • Data model • Equalization • Echo • RFI • Crosstalk • Conclusions

  8. Discrete Multi Tone: Receiver Data symbols Im bits 1 tap / tone 10 00 Time Domain Equalizer CP ... Re 11 01 taps ... ... 2 bits ... Im FEQ TEQ N-point S/P FFT Re 4 bits FFT demodulation • Principles • Intro • DMT • Data model • Equalization • Echo • RFI • Crosstalk • Conclusions

  9. Discrete Multi Tone: Cyclic Prefix CP To demodulator To demodulator • Principles • Intro • DMT • Data model • Equalization • Echo • RFI • Crosstalk • Conclusions `short’ channel `long’ channel

  10. Influence of the channel behind the FFT: Short channel: amplitude- en phase change for each tone separately Discrete Multi Tone: Interference Im Im Im Re Re Re • Long channel: interference between data symbols of different tones and different symbol periods • Principles • Intro • DMT • Data model • Equalization • Echo • RFI • Crosstalk • Conclusions

  11. Data model FIR channel add cyclic prefix synchronization delay Symbol length Prefix length Equalizer length Symbol period IDFT-matrix • Principles • Intro • DMT • Data model • Equalization • Echo • RFI • Crosstalk • Conclusions received samples function of transmitted data symbols noise

  12. Overview • Principles • Equalization • Echo • RFI • Crosstalk • Conclusions • Equalization • “Pre FFT” Equalization • TEQ: several design algorithms • See talk Prof. B. Evans • “Post FFT” Equalization • Equalization Per Tone • Structure and Initialization

  13. Time Domain Equalization (TEQ) T taps 1 tap/tone N-point TEQ ... ... ... S/P FEQ FFT CP ... ... D- line with down samplers • Principles • Equalization • TEQ • Per Tone • Echo • RFI • Crosstalk • Conclusions Original structure of time domain equalizer + FEQs:

  14. TEQ: Channel Shortening • Principles • Equalization • TEQ • Per Tone • Echo • RFI • Crosstalk • Conclusions • Channel Shortening [Al-Dhahir, Cioffi, Evans, Melsa, …] • Finding `optimal’ TEQ leads to non-linear optimization • Most channel shortening schemes are not equivalent to bitrate optimization • Resulting bitrate is often sensitive to synchronization delay • All tones are equalized in the same way  limited capacity • Limited memory: T-taps TEQ and 1-taps FEQ per used tone

  15. Per Tone Equalization (PTEQ) • From TEQ to Equalization Per Tone [Van Acker] The received data symbol for tone i after equalization is given by with Y an NxT Toeplitz matrix with received data samples After applying the associativity of the matrix product, we get Equalization Per Tone (PT-EQ) • Principles • Equalization • TEQ • Per Tone • Echo • RFI • Crosstalk • Conclusions

  16. PT-EQ: Structure S/P ... ... sliding ... PT-EQ ... N-punt FFT N-punt ... ... T –taps filter w for each tone FFT i • PTEQ-inputs: T successive FFT’s per DMT-symbol • Efficient calculation with `sliding FFT’ • Cheap implementation using first FFT en T-1 real difference terms (t=2...T). • Principles • Equalization • TEQ • Per Tone • Echo • RFI • Crosstalk • Conclusions

  17. PTEQ: Structure ... ... ... N-punt ... ... PTEQ ... FFT T –taps filter v for each tone i • PTEQ=linear combiner with T inputs per tone: 1 FFT-output and T-1 real difference terms wv i i • Principles • Equalization • TEQ • Per Tone • Echo • RFI • Crosstalk • Conclusions

  18. PTEQ: Complexity TEQ and FEQ PTEQ O(Fs(T+1/2)+NlogN) O(Fs(T+1)+NlogN) (multiplications) • Principles • Equalization • TEQ • Per Tone • Echo • RFI • Crosstalk • Conclusions • Complexity during data transmission is comparable with TEQ-complexity for the sameT: • TEQ • 1 (real) T-taps TEQ @ sample frequency Fs • 1 FFT operation @ symbol frequency Fs/(N+n) • (complex) 1-taps FEQ/used tone @ Fs/(N+n) • PTEQ • 1 FFT operation @ Fs/(N+n) • (complex) T-taps PTEQ/used tone @ Fs/(N+n) • Complexity reductions are possible by varying T per tone. • PTEQ requires more memory than TEQ.

  19. PTEQ: Initialization • Adaptive initialization using training sequence minimization of the sum of quadratic errors • with LMS: convergence too slow • with RLS: fast convergence, very complex • with combination of RLS and LMS: fast convergence, lower complexity than full RLS [Ysebaert] • Principles • Equalization • TEQ • Per Tone • Echo • RFI • Crosstalk • Conclusions • Optimization of SNR with quadratic cost function per tone • Direct initialization using channel and noise characteristics: • Optimal MMSE solution per tone • Too expensive

  20. Simulations 6 x 10 3.5 3 2.5 2 Bitrate (bits/s) 1.5 1 0.5 0 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 Delayd 32-taps PT-EQ 8-taps PT-EQ 32-taps TEQ 8-taps TEQ • Principles • Equalization • TEQ • Per Tone • Echo • RFI • Crosstalk • Conclusions Comparison of PT-EQ and TEQ for 4km line, downstream • Down: • N=512, n=32, • Fs=2.2 MHz, • tones 39-256 • Bitrate versus delay • MMSE solution for PTEQ • TEQ-init. with MMSE channel shortening with |b|=1

  21. Simulations • Principles • Equalization • TEQ • Per Tone • Echo • RFI • Crosstalk • Conclusions Adaptive initialization T1.601#13line+24DSL NEXT, downstream • Bitrate as a function of the number of training symbols for PT-EQ • T=32, d=-8

  22. Overview • Principles • Equalization • Echo • RFI • Crosstalk • Conclusions • Echo cancellation (EC) • Problem formulation • Principles of EC • Echo cancellation per tone (PTEC)

  23. EC: Problem Formulation echo-canceller • Principles • Equalization • Echo • Problem formulation • EC principle • PTEC • RFI • Crosstalk • Conclusions • Hybrid couples transmitter and receiver to the same line • Imperfectly balanced hybrid can cause leakage (echo) of the transmitted signal into the received signal. • Solutions: • Assign different frequencies for transmitted and received signal (FDD). • Cancel the echo (EC). DMT-tx hybrid telephone line Echo DMT-rx

  24. Principle of Echo Cancellation N-IFFT N-FFT CP CP P/S TEC hybride FEQ S/P TEQ • Principles • Equalization • Echo • Problem formulation • EC principle • PTEC • RFI • Crosstalk • Conclusions • Echo canceller has 2 tasks: • Modeling the echo path (adaptively). • Remove the estimate of the echo signal from the received signal. • Original approaches: - time domain EC (TEC) - mixed time/frequency EC [Ho, Cioffi]

  25. Per Tone Echo Cancellation (PTEC) • Principles • Equalization • Echo • Problem formulation • EC principle • PTEC • RFI • Crosstalk • Conclusions • Structure [Van Acker] • Starting point: modem with equalization and echo cancellation in time domain (TEQ en TEC). • This structure is modified analogously to `TEQ to PT-EQ conversion’, i.e. TEQ and TEC are shifted behind FFT. • Goal: bitrate optimization

  26. Per Tone Echo Cancellation (PTEC) PTEC N-FFT N-IFFT N-FFT CP P/S D-line with downsamp. D-line with downsamp. D-line with downsamp. D-line with downsamp. PTEQ • Principles • Equalization • Echo • Problem formulation • EC principle • PTEC • RFI • Crosstalk • Conclusions

  27. PT-EC: Complexity • Cost function • Cost function contains optimal joint shortening per tone • SNR per tone is maximized PT-EC PT-EQ • Principles • Equalization • Echo • Problem formulation • EC principle • PTEC • RFI • Crosstalk • Conclusions • Complexity of PT-EC filtering • Similar to time domain EC (for same filter length) • Optimization of filter length per tone • Extra FFT-operation on echo reference signal

  28. Simulations 6 x 10 3.4 3.2 3 2.8 Bitrate (bits/s) 2.6 2.4 2.2 2 0 50 100 150 200 250 T E 32-taps PTEQ 2*16-taps PTEQ 32-taps PTEQ, no echo 2*16-taps PTEQ, no echo • Principles • Equalization • Echo • Problem formulation • EC principle • PTEC • RFI • Crosstalk • Conclusions Echo cancellation per tone for 4 km line, downstream • FDM with tx- and rx-filters of low order • Bitrate as a function of the length of the echo filter (PT-EC) • Comparable with 400 taps time domain EC

  29. Overview • Principles • Equalization • Echo • RFI • Crosstalk • Conclusions • Radio frequency interference mitigation • Problem definition • Receiver structure (in brief) Window incorporated PTEQ (WI-PTEQ) • Simulation results

  30. RFI interference problem • Principles • Equalization • Echo • RFI • Problem formulation • WI-PTEQ • Crosstalk • Conclusions • Downstream band overlaps with e.g. AM broadcast bands which causes narrowband interference. • Contrary to popular belief: affects lots of tones • Reason? High DFT filter bank side lobes. • Solution? Windowing functions.

  31. PTEQ + windowing: Structure [Cuypers] • Principles • Equalization • Echo • RFI • Problem formulation • WI-PTEQ • Crosstalk • Conclusions

  32. Simulation results • Principles • Equalization • Echo • RFI • Problem formulation • WI-PTEQ • Crosstalk • Conclusions • Nice gain for low number of taps • ADSL T1.601#13 standard loop • RFI at 630, 740, 800, 980, 1100, 1160, 308 kHz

  33. Overview • Principles • Equalization • Echo • RFI • Crosstalk • Conclusions • Per tone alien crosstalk mitigation • Problem definition • Principles of cyclostationarity • Receiver structure PTEQ combined with FRESH filtering • Simulation results

  34. Problem Formulation: Per-tone Alien Crosstalk Mitigation TX TX TX TX Near-end XT User 1 RX RX RX RX Far-endXT Desired User 2 Binder Remote terminals Central office • Principles • Equalization • Echo • RFI • Crosstalk • Problem formulation • Principle • Receiver structure • Conclusions • Crosstalk (XT)

  35. Problem Formulation • Principles • Equalization • Echo • RFI • Crosstalk • Problem formulation • Principle • Receiver structure • Conclusions • Crosstalk (XT): reduces the SNR in each frequency bin • Crosstalk types: • Self XT: caused by other ADSL systems • Alien XT: caused by copper wire transmission systems with different modulation scheme occupying (partially) same frequency band • Alien crosstalk examples: • in ADSL: HDSL and SDSL XT (baseband) • in VDSL: HPNA (QAM passband)

  36. Principles of Cyclostationarity DSL symbol blocks k k+1 k+2 XT symbols Non-integer relation between DSL and XT symbol rate • Principles • Equalization • Echo • RFI • Crosstalk • Problem formulation • Principle • Receiver structure • Conclusions • What makes alien XT particular? •  Sampling offset between DSL and XT changes from DSL block to block • XT “nonstationary”, i.e. time varying, w.r.t. DSL symbol rate • Processing varies from DSL block to block? • No: exploit XT cyclostationarity(*) in “frequency domain” ((*) with large period: e.g. 100s of symbols)

  37. Principles of Cyclostationarity PSD(f) EBW EBW f -fs -fs/2 fs fs/2 Same information about signal! • Principles • Equalization • Echo • RFI • Crosstalk • Problem formulation • Principle • Receiver structure • Conclusions • Received PSD of cyclostationary signals with excess bandwidth (EBW) • E.g. SDSL XT, symbol rate of fs=1.04MHz, 100% EBW Determined by pulse shape and channel

  38. Principles of Cyclostationarity uncorrelated correlated PSD(f) y’ = + shiftedADSL EBW f fs/2 fs • Principles • Equalization • Echo • RFI • Crosstalk • Problem formulation • Principle • Receiver structure • Conclusions • Mitigate the cyclostationary SDSL from a received signal y PSD(f) y = + ADSL EBW f fs fs/2 by optimal combined filtering of y and frequency shifted version y’ (shift = fs) [Gardner]

  39. Receiver Structure XT canceller CP Overall structure = time varying time invariant filters • Principles • Equalization • Echo • RFI • Crosstalk • Problem formulation • Principle • Receiver structure • Conclusions • From classical TEQ to TEQ with alien crosstalk mitigation: 1 tap/tone N-points ... ... ... S/P FFT FEQ TEQ • Only prior knowledge required: fs=crosstalker symbol rate

  40. Per-Tone Receiver for Alien Crosstalk Mitigation N-FFT N-FFT XT canceller D-line with downsamp. D-line with downsamp. D-line with downsamp. D-line with downsamp. • Principles • Equalization • Echo • RFI • Crosstalk • Problem formulation • Principle • Receiver structure • Conclusions • From “pre-FFT” to “post-FFT” (cfr. from TEQ to PTEQ) PTEQ

  41. Simulation Results • Principles • Equalization • Echo • RFI • Crosstalk • Problem formulation • Principle • Receiver structure • Conclusions • Bitrate as a function of loop length (26AWG loops) • SDSL crosstalker • Up to 100 % gain around 3000m

  42. Conclusions • Principles • Equalization • Echo • RFI • Crosstalk • Conclusions • Evolution in equalization • TEQ: Simple initialization, low memory requirements, little relation with bit rate, unpredictable behaviour • PTEQ: Optimize SNR per tone, comparable complexity, high memory requirements • Per tone echo canceling • PTEC: Optimize SNR per tone, apply the same trick as for PTEQ • Radio frequency interference • Solution based on PTEQ + windowing (WI-PTEQ) • Crosstalk mitigation • Solution based on PTEQ + FREquency SHift PTEQ (FRESH)

  43. Time-/frequency domain EC N-IFFT N-FFT CP CP P/S Time dom. EC hybrid freq. dom. EC FEQ TEQ S/P • Principles • Equalization • Echo • Problem formulation • EC principle • PTEC • RFI • Crosstalk • Conclusions • Time-/frequency domain EC [Ho, Cioffi] • Adaptation of EC filter: in frequency domain • Removing echo: partially in time- and frequency domain • Efficient implementation of time domain EC

  44. Double talk problem N-IFFT N-IFFT Freq. EC Update CES hybrid FEQ 1/FEQ N-FFT TEQ • Principles • Equalization • Echo • Problem formulation • EC principle • PTEC • RFI • Crosstalk • Conclusions • Far end signal causes excess MSE in EC coefficient update • LMS step size has to be lowered to average out far end signal  reduced convergence speed = double talk problem • Solution: cancellation of far end signal prior to EC update [Ysebaert] C P CP

More Related