50 likes | 64 Views
Analyzing the growth of Sky TV subscribers and the factors influencing it, including win rates, churn rates, customer acquisition, and competition.
E N D
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT DYNAMICS Kim Warren Strategy Dynamics: Sky TV subscribers ‘Strategic Management Dynamics’, 2008, by Kim Warren, from J Wiley & Sons. www.wiley.com/go/smd
Example 1: Will Sky satellite TV hit 10 million subscribers by 2010 – as promised to investors back in 2004? Here’s the situation mid-2007 after 3 years of effort … SKY SUBSCRIBERS 000s Net new subscribers pq 000s 10,000 8582 7015 400 Sept 03 Jun 07 Mar 10 90 Sept 03 Jun 07 Mar 10 • There are 25 million households in total, most getting analogue TV services • 14 quarters to go @ +90,000 per quarter = + 1,260,000 ... just short of target • … so strategy = • give great deals [i.e. cut the price!] • throw money at marketing • Job done ?
Will Sky hit 10 million subscribers? SKY SUBSCRIBERS 000s 10,000 New subscribers pq 000s Subscribers lost pq 000s 8582 7015 349 Sept 03 Jun 07 Mar 10 400 300 259 Sept 03 Jun 07 Mar 10 Sept 03 Jun 07 Mar 10 Can Sky … 1. keep the win-rate up – or 2. slow down the churn? Where do new customers come from? How many are out there? Where do they go? … and why? How many have already gone [~3million]? Do they ever come back? Where else to potential customers go, and why? This framework alone provides big insight in surprisingly many cases – yes, ‘it’s obvious’, but only if you ask the question !
Example scenario for Sky satellite TV rivalry to 2010 As always, outcomes depend on the flow-rates. No realistic set of assumptions get Sky to 10 million See model of this situation on the strategy dynamics forum www.strategydynamics.com/forum [go to Knowledge Exchange, Business]
RBV - Resources, VRIO, intangibles and capabilities • The problem [I believe]: • ‘strategic’ resources drive performance • ‘strategic’ = VRIO [valuable, rare, inimitable, and organisationally embedded • … so simple tangible factors are dismissed • But … • The ‘performance’ of concern is assumed to be profitability, not earnings growth • … or more generally, improving performance over time • VRIO factors are abstract and ambiguous, described only vaguely and inconsistently in the literature • A solution • Profitability [or other performance] depends immediately on tangible factors • These accumulate and deplete over time, and are interdependent. • It’s ‘the system’ that drives performance, not a ‘list’ of resources, whether VRIO or not • So … • IF VRIO factors are to influence performance over time, they must do so by affecting the rate of accumulation of non-VRIO factors. • ... so we can’t ‘explain’ performance without including simple, tangible resources. i.e. You can’t explain airline performance without including ‘customers’ and ‘aircraft’ any more than you can ‘explain’ milk production without including cows !!