1 / 27

Texas Department of Transportation Corpus Christi District

Texas Department of Transportation Corpus Christi District. U.S. 181 (Harbor Bridge) Environmental Documentation and Schematic Development Citizens’ Advisory Committee September 27- 28, 2005. Welcome. Tonight’s Agenda. Introductions Mission of Citizens’ Advisory Committee

sniderb
Download Presentation

Texas Department of Transportation Corpus Christi District

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Texas Department of TransportationCorpus Christi District U.S. 181 (Harbor Bridge) Environmental Documentation and Schematic Development Citizens’ Advisory Committee September 27- 28, 2005

  2. Welcome

  3. Tonight’s Agenda • Introductions • Mission of Citizens’ Advisory Committee • Review of Harbor Bridge Feasibility Study • Project Status and Schedule • Environmental Documentation Process • Alternative Alignments • Planning for Next Meeting

  4. Mission of the CAC • To offer community the opportunity for timely information exchange with TxDOT on Harbor Bridge project • To present project information as it becomes available • To consider your comments • To assist TxDOT in conveying information to the community

  5. CAC Logistics • Open membership • Meetings held at frequency desired by membership • Now meeting in Portland and Corpus Christi

  6. Summary of Harbor Bridge Feasibility Study • Completed in 2003 • Established purpose and need for bridge replacement • Considered public input • Identified/evaluated four possible corridors for replacement bridge • Recommended a preferred corridor

  7. Study Area for Harbor Bridge Replacement

  8. Need for Harbor Bridge Improvement • Safety • Steep vertical grades • Lack of shoulders • Sharp horizontal curves • Maintenance • High costs • Corrosive environment • Economics • Restrictive vertical clearance

  9. Public Input Considered • Considered input from the public and other stakeholders • Three citizens’ advisory committee meetings • Two newsletters • Two public meetings

  10. Your Ideas for Harbor Bridge Replacement • Safety • Provide adequate width for current and future traffic • Provide shoulders and remove sharp approach curves • Make more user friendly with bike lanes and pedestrian walkway • Social/Community • Support livable, united neighborhoods • Revitalize community

  11. Your Ideas for Harbor Bridge Replacement (cont.) • Maintenance • Use durable materials/ long lasting structure • Aesthetics • Maintain distinctive, signature structure • Result in skyline worthy structure • Economics • Provide adequate navigational clearances

  12. Harbor Bridge Corridor Alternatives

  13. Corridor Evaluation Process • Evaluation criteria developed for four possible corridors • Criteria fall into three categories: • Environmental/Public Involvement Issues • Traffic/Planning • Engineering • Each alternative corridor evaluated and ranked

  14. Ranking of Corridors forHarbor Bridge Replacement # 1: Red Corridor Why? • Lower environmental impact • Achieves desirable design criteria • Highly compatible with future development plans for local community • Resolves offset alignment between Crosstown Expressway and U.S. 181

  15. Ranking of Corridor forHarbor Bridge Replacement # 2: Orange Corridor Why? • Similar environmental impact to #1 • Meets design criteria • Moderately compatible with future development plans

  16. Ranking of Corridor forHarbor Bridge Replacement # 3: Blue Corridor Why? • Higher impact on coastal/aquatic life • Higher visual impact • Worsens access to central business district • Creates barrier between central business district and beachfront area

  17. Ranking of Corridors forHarbor Bridge Replacement # 4: Green Corridor Why? • More relocations required than for red and orange • High adverse effect on local business/ economic interests • Low compatibility with future development plans for community • Worsens access to central business district • Does not address offset alignment between Crosstown Expressway and U.S. 181

  18. Project Phases • Feasibility Study – Completed in 2003 • Environmental Documentation and Schematic Development – Now underway • Right-of-Way Mapping/Acquisition • Preparation of Detailed Construction Plan • Construction – funding and phasing

  19. Tolling Considered for Harbor Bridge Replacement • TxDOT charged by Texas Transportation Commission to consider tolling of new facilities • Tolling study will include investigation of tolling strategies and their application to this project • Estimate amount of toll • Estimate possible revenues to be generated from tolling • Evaluate number of lanes to be tolled • Use of tolling will affect construction schedule

  20. Projected Harbor Bridge Replacement Timeline • Complete feasibility study – Summer 2003 • Prepare Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) followed by Record of Decision (ROD) • Prepare document – 2004 to 2008 • Public involvement – Throughout project • Environmental Clearance – 2008

  21. Harbor Bridge Replacement Timeline (cont.) • Prepare ROW Map and Acquire ROW –2008 to 2010 • Develop construction plans –2008 to 2010 • Start phase construction –2010-2015 (with tolling); 2025- 2030 (without tolling)

  22. Approach to Environmental Documentation/ Schematic Development Phase • Red Corridor recommended for further evaluation in Feasibility Study • In 2005, TxDOT and FHWA determined that Green and Blue Corridors need not be evaluated in detail during the EIS process • However, all corridors, including the No-Build, to be considered during the EIS process

  23. Potential Environmental Constraints

  24. Status of Environmental Documentation Process NEXT . . . • Assess impacts from proposed alternatives on Social, Natural and Physical Environment • Coordinate with local, state and Federal agencies that oversee resources that may be impacted • Develop mitigation strategies for those impacts that cannot be avoided

  25. Alternative Alignments for Further Study

  26. Meeting with Corpus Christi AIA • Meet on Sept. 29 to review Harbor Bridge replacement project with local architects • Explain current alignments being evaluated • Provide local architects an opportunity to provide input on type of structure and lighting options for a new bridge

  27. Planning for Next Meeting • Next CAC meeting: date/topics • Upcoming public meeting: 1/06

More Related