1 / 8

PRESENTATION OUTLINE

This presentation provides an analysis of the RESA project's strengths, limitations, opportunities, threats, and the way forward. It highlights effective grassroots consumer-policy maker linkages, support from media and regulatory bodies, and the active involvement of the RG/PAC members. It also addresses limitations such as limited geographical coverage and the need for more frequent trainings. Furthermore, it explores opportunities for further involvement of government and regulatory bodies, demand from local CSOs, and the establishment of a consumer cell at the local level. The presentation concludes with threats such as political instability and limited time period. The way forward includes the importance of long-term consumer engagement, capacity building on a wider scale, and continued support from NORAD.

sohn
Download Presentation

PRESENTATION OUTLINE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. MID TERM REVIEW MEETINGRESA PROJECTSLOT ANALYSIS: FIRST PHASE1ST APRIL 2009UDAI S. MEHTA, CUTS INTERNATIONAL

  2. PRESENTATION OUTLINE • S - TRENGTHS • L - IMITATIONS • O - PPORTUNITIES • T – HREATS • WAY FORWARD

  3. STRENGHTS • Effective link between grassroots consumers and policy makers • Support of media, government and regulatory bodies • Active involvement of the RG/PAC Members: Sense of ownership • Capable and experienced team members • Active support of RESA partners: Territory and local level • Developed strong and sustainable networks at the grassroots level • Demand from local partners to further undertake activities and broaden the geographical scope

  4. LIMITATIONS • Limited geographical coverage • Short duration: demand for continuous engagement • Trainings needs to be conducted more often • Different level of competence of local partners • Mindset problem at local level

  5. OPPORTUNITIES • Indication of government and regulatory bodies to be further involved • Demand from Local CSOs to undertake further activities at grassroots level • Establishment of a consumer cell at local level: Rajasthan • Undertaking capacity building activities at more frequent intervals • Replicate the model in S-E Asia or Africa region: CLV region • Demand to further engage with the media, policy makers, etc

  6. THREATS • Political instability or uncertainty • Frequent shuffling of local representative may hinder the advocacy efforts • Targeted consumers from GIM Phase I may not be available for the GIM Phase II • Limited time period to cover Phase II

  7. WAY FORWARD • RESA – a positive step towards reducing gap between consumers and policy makers • Demand for long term engagement with consumers at grassroots level • Capacity building on a wider scale: cover new consumers • Continued support of NORAD • Initiate RESA model in new territories • Continue the work in the existing territories

  8. Thank You usm@cuts.org http://www.cuts-ccier.org/RESA/index.htm

More Related