1 / 11

Identifying Coronal Holes in Solar Disk Images (and how to compare to models)

Identifying Coronal Holes in Solar Disk Images (and how to compare to models). Working Group Report Nick Arge  Rachel Hock  Carl Henney. Definitions (from our invited speakers). Coronal holes : observable used as a proxy for open field regions

sonja
Download Presentation

Identifying Coronal Holes in Solar Disk Images (and how to compare to models)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Identifying Coronal Holes in Solar Disk Images (and how to compare to models) Working Group Report Nick Arge Rachel Hock Carl Henney

  2. Definitions (from our invited speakers) Coronal holes: observable used as a proxy for open field regions • Dark regions in the EUV/X-ray (bright in He I 1083) which correspond to regions of reduced density and temperature • Predominately unipolar • Sources of high speed solar wind (While true, perhaps not the best observational criteria.) Open field regions: regions of magnetic field that extend far into the solar wind

  3. One of Many Motivations • How can we validate solar wind models? • Coronal holes/open field regions are heavily influenced by non-potential fields. • We know that the magnetic fields in/near filaments and active regions are non-potential. • Can we use observations of coronal holes to constraint/validate solar wind models?

  4. Session 1: Observations and Methods • Invited talk by Larisza Krista • Overview of coronal hole observations • Range of historic/current detection methods • Consensus:EUV images especially with AIA/STEREO + magnetograms (or ADAPT for farside??) give nice coronal hole maps. • But there are MANY techniques. We need VALIDATION and estimates of the UNCERTAINTIES. • Not all dark regions are coronal holes (i.e. filaments) • Line-of-sight issues make some coronal holes less dark than others

  5. Session 1: Validation • Legitimate resistance to hand-drawn maps as "ground truth" as they are subjective • Maybe maps shouldn't be binary (confidence levels)? • Many observers/many times “fuzzy” coronal hole maps • Still subject to human error but does provide something to quantitatively compare methods to • If not hand-drawn maps, then what? USE OTHER DATA that is less ambiguous • Doppler maps • White light/limb synoptic maps (NishuKarna) • Spectroscopic observations (Michael Hahn) • He I (less issues with the limb) • H-alpha for filaments • Improving/validating the techniques for space weather and modeling may, at the same time, might lead to new understanding of coronal hole physics

  6. Session 2: Modeling and Theory • Invited talk by Jon Linker • Coronal holes and open magnetic field • Deficiencies in the observations that impact models • Lack of polar field observations • Magnetograph calibration issues • No far side data ... can have flux imbalance when AR comes over east limb • Total open magnetic flux: models that match coronal hole boundary underestimate the flux; models that overestimate the coronal holes get the flux right! • In models, closed magnetic fields near open flux regions can be dark! • Is this an artifact of evolving the model to a steady state?

  7. Session 2: Modeling and Theory • Spiro Antiochos started the discussion on the dynamics of the boundaries of open field regions • It is not an either (open) ... or (closed)! • How does this relate to the boundary of coronal holes? • What are the time- and length- scales? • Larisza: from SOHO, observationally coronal holes boundaries vary: few hours/~30 Mm • AIA observations are perfect for this! • Should spectroscopic observations be used as emissivity in the EUV might not be enough? • Dynamics of boundaries should be observable both in coronal and solar wind observations • Streamer stalk/HCS: currently observed in solar wind data • Plumes/jets/rays: observed in coronal images • Plasma sheet/pseudostreamers Open Interface Closed

  8. EUV images (AIA & STEREO) + magnetograms are great for routine automated detection of coronal holes.Other observations need to be used to improve our understanding of how EUV coronal holes relate to open magnetic field regions  improve the utility of using EUV coronal holes in validating models

  9. Coronal holes and open magnetic field regions are dynamic and their boundaries may not be the same!What does this mean for static/steady state solar wind models?There is a lot of work still to be done!

  10. A workshop to identify coronal holes & how best to compare them with models • Objectives: • Review and discussing the latest techniques for identifying coronal holes in solar disk data • Ascertaining how modelers and other users can best make use of coronal hole identifications. Where: New Mexico State University (NMSU) Las Cruces, New Mexico When (if funded): January 2014 • If interested, please sendemailto: nick.arge@kirtland.af.mil Organizing Committee: James McAteer, Rachel Hock, Nick Arge, & Carl Henney

More Related