180 likes | 423 Views
Chapter Seven Earnings Management and the Quality of Financial Reporting. Defining Earnings Management. Inflate (deflate) revenues or earnings per share By using aggressive accounting techniques such as capitalizing costs that should have been expensed
E N D
Chapter Seven Earnings Management and the Quality of Financial Reporting
Defining Earnings Management • Inflate (deflate) revenues or earnings per share • By using aggressive accounting techniques such as capitalizing costs that should have been expensed • Establishing/altering the elements of an estimate to achieve a desired goal • Must have ethical intent to make moral decisions • Underlying motivation is pursuance of self-interest
Defining Earnings Management(cont) Different views on earnings management Negative light- “purposeful intervention in the external reporting process, with the intent of obtaining some private gain”- Schipper Positive light- “Reasonable and legal management decision making and reporting intended to achieve stable and predictable financial results”- McKee
Ethics of Earnings Management • Use ethics framework to judge acceptability • Virtue ethics examines reasons for the actions taken by decision maker AND the action itself • McKee’s explanation is merely a rationalization • Doesn’t hold true to virtues of honesty and dependability • Ignores rights of shareholders and stakeholders to receive fair and accurate information • Masks true performance • Utilitarian Perspective • A decision made by weighing benefits of management/ company to smooth net income vs. costs of providing false information to shareholders • Rule Utilitarian • Financial statements should never be manipulated for personal gain
The Acceptability of Earnings Management from a Materiality Perspective Defining Materiality • FASB Defines as: • “the magnitude of an omission or misstatement of accounting information that, in the light of surrounding circumstances, makes it probable that the judgment of a reasonable person relying on the information would have been changed or influenced by the omission or misstatement” • Both the qualitative and quantitative factors must be considered when assessing materiality • Judgments of materiality rely on the “reasonable person standard • Judged by relative amount and nature of item • SAB 99 lists qualitative factors that cause small misstatements to become material
Considerations of Materiality in Evaluating Internal Control Deficiencies Under Sarbanes-Oxley • Identify key control exceptions • Apply a materiality concept to determine financial impact • Vorhies 4 perspectives to help meet SOX Requirements: • The actual financial statement misstatement/error • An internal control deficiency caused by the failure in design or operation of a control • A large variance in an accounting estimate compared with the actual determined amount • Financial fraud by management or other employees to enhance in company’s reported financial position and operating results • Design failure • Occurs when management fails to establish sufficient internal control • Operating failure • Adequately designed control doesn’t operate properly • Estimating financial events is necessary in accounting • As long as process is reasonable, the amount of variance is irrelevant
Current Auditing Standards and Presumptions • Materiality is matter of professional judgment • Based on auditor’s perception of needs of users of statements as a group; not as individuals • Users are assumed to: • Have appropriate knowledge of business and economic activities • Understand statements are prepared and audited to levels of materiality • Recognize uncertainties in amounts based on estimates, judgment, and future events • Make appropriate economic decisions based on information in financial statements • SAS No. 107- Uses benchmarks to evaluate materiality: • Total revenues, gross profit, or other categories of reported income
Restatements of Financial Statements • Revising (voluntarily or advised) financial information that was previously reported • Restatements increased during 2000-2006 • Since 2006, number has gone down • Due to SOX • And new PCAOB auditing standards • Restatements Due to Errors in Accounting and Reporting • 1,295 restatements in 2005 • Represents about one restatement per 12 public companies
SEC Advisory Committee on Improvements to Financial Reporting • Shift of materiality judgments from professional judgment and the “reasonable person” standard to emphasizing whether a restatement may be desirable to meet user (investor) needs • SAB 99 is being applied too broadly • Subcommittee believes market reaction is a factor in evaluating materiality • SEC’s position to reduce number of restatements • Restatements are important to users and should be based on ethical factors:
SEC Advisory Committee on Improvements to Financial Reporting (cont) • Dishonesty may be behind the restatement • Questions about integrity of management may persist • Environment of pressure may lead to manipulating earnings that have to be restated later • All companies with restatement should be required to disclose: • How the restatement was discovered • Why the restatement occurred • Corrective actions to prevent future errors
Earnings Management Techniques • Schilit’s 7 Common Financial Statement Shenanigans: • Recording Revenue too soon or of questionable quality • Recording bogus revenue • Boosting income with one-time gains • Shifting current expenses to a later or earlier period • Failing to record or improperly reducing liabilities • Shifting current revenue to a later period • Shifting future expenses to the current period as a special charge
Descriptions of Financial Shenanigans • The Case of Xerox • Motivation for Fraud • “polish its reputation on Wall Street and to boost the company’s stock price” • Fraudulent Lease Accounting: • Value determination was substituted with formula which management could easily manipulate • “Cushion Reserves” • Violated SFAS No. 5 “Accounting for Contingencies” • Sanctions by the SEC on KPMG • Paid $10 million in penalties, disgorged $10 million in audit fees, and $2.7 million in interest
Descriptions of Financial Shenanigans • The Case of Lucent Technologies • Motivated by drive to: • Realize revenue • Meet internal sales targets • Obtain sales bonuses • Outstanding increases in operating income, net income, and stock price should have raised red flag to KPMG
Descriptions of Financial Shenanigans:The Story of Enron • Started because debt load was high and needed to finance borrowings that would not be shown on balance sheet • Skilling’s “Gas Bank” Idea • Pooling investments in gas-supply contracts and selling long-term deals to utilities • Rather than booking the revenue on long-term contracts as it came in, Enron would book immediately like a marketable security • Fastow’s Special-Purpose Entities • To entice producers to invest in Gas plan, Enron needed cash to offer up front • Began to create partnerships that took money from banks and gave it to producers in return for a portion of existing gas reserves
The Story of Enron • The Culture at Enron • “Rank and yank” employee-evaluation policy • Set in place as incentive to keep employee’s quiet • Creation of Chewco • Increasingly harder to keep revenues growing each quarter • Executive Compensation • Far exceeded all competitors • Encouraged executives that by giving out stock options this would provide cash • Claimed if profits and stock price went up enough, the schedule for such options would be accelerated
The Story of Enron • Skilling resigned after 6 months as CEO • Sharron Watkin’s letter to Ken Lay • Described in detail problems with Enron’s partnerships • Vinson & Elkins claimed no reason for concern • The Final Days • Announced overstatement of earnings by $586 million • Ken Lay and Jeff Skilling found guilty of fraud and conspiracy
The Story of Enron • A Review of Important Accounting Issues • Caused by variety of factors: • Improperly failing to consolidate SPE (Chewco) • Failing to adequately disclose related-party relationship between Enron and SPE’s • Overstatement of earnings • Quality of financial reports were poor • Managed earnings • Lack of strong controls • FASB Interpretation No. 45(R) • Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities • Requires unconsolidated variable interest entities to be consolidated if they do not effectively disperse risk among parties involved • No longer a percentage ownership test
The Story of Enron • Enron’s Role in SOX • Provisions that were motivated by Enron fraud: • Prohibiting the provision of internal audit services for audit clients • Off-balance sheet financing activities must be disclosed in notes to financials • Related-party transactions must be disclosed in notes to financials • Lessons to be learned • Weak internal controls lead to possible fraud • Need for ethical tone at the top • Be cautious of the ethical slippery slope • Watch out for greed