1 / 11

Kathryn J. Aikin, Ph.D. Social Science Analyst

Assessing the Impact of a Toll-Free Number for Reporting Side Effects in Direct-to-Consumer Television Ads: Proposed Study Design. Kathryn J. Aikin, Ph.D. Social Science Analyst Division of Drug Marketing, Advertising and Communications, FDA Risk Communication Advisory Committee Meeting.

sora
Download Presentation

Kathryn J. Aikin, Ph.D. Social Science Analyst

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Assessing the Impact of a Toll-Free Number for Reporting Side Effects in Direct-to-Consumer Television Ads: Proposed Study Design Kathryn J. Aikin, Ph.D. Social Science Analyst Division of Drug Marketing, Advertising and Communications, FDA Risk Communication Advisory Committee Meeting May 16, 2008

  2. Presentation Outline • Public Comment Process for Federal Research • Current Legislation and Other Relevant Background • Research Questions and Draft Study Design

  3. OMB Information Collections Flow of Federal Register Notices for Public Comment Program office sends the draft 60-day FR notice to PRA analyst If PRA analyst makes changes the draft 60-day FR notice is returned to the program office for revisions PRA analyst reviews draft 60-day FR notice 60-day FR notice forwarded to RES for publication Corrected draft 60-day FR notice returned to PRA analyst 60-day notice published in FR; program office sends ICR (supporting statement, attachments and form 83-I) to PRA analyst for review Peer Review RIHSC Review 60 day comment period If no comments are received on the 60-day FR notice PRA analyst prepares 30-day FR notice 30-day FR notice forwarded to RES 30-day notice published in Federal Register PRA analyst prepares 30-day FR notice If comments are received on the 60-day FR notice Program office sends response to comments to PRA analyst 30 day comment period If OCC review is requested by program office, the PRA analyst forwards 30-day notice to OCC OMB has 60 days to take action on the information collection. OMB may APPROVE, APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS or DISAPPROVE PRA analyst uploads the ICR into HHS’s tracking system PRA analyst notifies HHS of the 30-day FR notice publication HHS forwards ICR to OMB Indicates beginning of process Indicates end of process

  4. Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007 (FDAAA) Sec. 906 STATEMENT FOR INCLUSION IN DIRECT-TO-CONSUMER ADVERTISEMENTS OF DRUGS. • PUBLISHED DIRECT-TO-CONSUMER ADVERTISEMENTS.--- Section 502(n) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 352), as amended by section 901(d)(6), is further amended by inserting “and in the case of published direct-to-consumer advertisements the following statement printed in conspicuous text: ‘You are encouraged to report negative side effects of prescription drugs to the FDA. Visit www.fda.gov/medwatch, or call 1-800-FDA-1088.’,” after “section 701(a),”. • STUDY.--- • IN GENERAL.--- In the case of direct-to-consumer television advertisements, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, in consultation with the Advisory Committee on Risk Communication under section 567 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (as added by section 917), shall, not later than 6 months after the date of the enactment of this Act, conduct a study to determine if the statement in section 502(n) of such Act (as added by subsection (a)) required with respect to published direct-to-consumer advertisements is appropriate for inclusion in such television advertisements.

  5. Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007 (FDAAA), con’t. (2) CONTENT.--- As part of the study under paragraph (1), such Secretary shall consider whether the information in the statement described in paragraph (1) would detract from the presentation of risk information in a direct-to-consumer television advertisement. If such Secretary determines the inclusion of such statement is appropriate in direct-to-consumer television advertisements, such Secretary shall issue regulations requiring the implementation of such statement in direct-to-consumer television advertisements, including determining a reasonable length of time for displaying the statement in such advertisements. The Secretary shall report to the appropriate committees of Congress the findings of such study and any plans to issue regulations under this paragraph.

  6. Other Relevant Background • Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act (Public Law 107-109, January 4, 2002) • Section 17 required FDA to issue a final rule requiring the addition of a statement to the labeling of each drug product for which an application is approved under section 505 of the Act. Under the BPCA, the statements must include: (1) a toll-free number maintained by FDA for the purpose of receiving reports of adverse events regarding drugs; and (2) a statement that the number is to be used only for reporting purposes, and it should not be used to seek or obtain medical advice (the side effects statement).

  7. Focus Group Findings • Some of the high school educated or less group thought that the statements instructed them to call FDA for medical help. • Some participants in both groups understood the statements, but said they were not motivating enough to cause them to call FDA’s toll-free number in the event that they might experience an adverse side effect. • Some participants in both groups understood the statements and said they would call FDA to report adverse side effects if serious enough. • Many suggested the addition of a Web site to report adverse side effects.

  8. Research Questions for Committee • Does the inclusion of a toll-free number for reporting side effects in DTC television advertisements detract from the communication of important risk information in the ad? • If the statement does not detract from the communication of important risk information, what is the optimal length of time this statement should be displayed in the ad?

  9. Proposed Design + Control (no toll-free statement) + Extra Prominent (after Major Statement of Risks, toll-free statement in both SUPER and Voiceover)

  10. Proposed Sample • Gender: • Roughly equal distribution of men and women • At least 40% but not more than 60% men in each condition • Age: • Must be 21 years or older • Spectrum of ages from 20s to 80s • No more than 15% under age 25 in each condition • At least 40% over age 55 in each condition • Education: • Spectrum from less than high school graduate to post graduate education • No more than 30% with advanced degrees (i.e., Master’s, Ph.D., J.D., M.D., etc.) • At least 15% with high school education or less (including people who have completed high school with diploma or GED or who have some high school but have not completed high school)

  11. Research Questions for Committee • Does the inclusion of a toll-free number for reporting side effects in DTC broadcast advertisements detract from the communication of important risk information in the ad? • Will the proposed study address this question? • If the statement does not detract from the communication of important risk information, what is the optimal length of time this statement should be displayed in the ad?

More Related