190 likes | 342 Views
TITLE. Eastern Europe and Former Soviet Union Class 1. General Information. Approximately 26 separate economies now About 430 million roughly 2/3 in former Soviet Union within Eastern Europe Poland (40M); Romania (25M).
E N D
TITLE Eastern Europe and Former Soviet Union Class 1
General Information • Approximately 26 separate economies now • About 430 million • roughly 2/3 in former Soviet Union • within Eastern Europe • Poland (40M); Romania (25M)
Common themeTransition from socialist to market economiesBegan in 1989 in Poland
Status on the eve of transition Portugal, Greece UK, Italy Russia (1988)
Substantial gap widening from early 1970s Annual growth rate
Krugman’s perspective • Early growth was primarily due to growth in economic inputs • a kind of economic growth that is self-limiting • as opposed to growth attributable to increases in output per unit of input
Why was state-led industrialization adopted? • Use the power of the state to mobilize financial resources for rapid investment, particularly in basic industry • state owns the capital and can choose how to reinvest it.
Other motivations • Belief that state-led growth would be more equitable: • capital income would be shared by the whole society, not a privileged few.
How did decisions get made regarding • What goods and services got produced • How the major factors of production got allocated • Can’t rely on market mechanisms • balances are achieved by administrative procedures
CPSU sets output targets for crucial commodities GOSPLAN sets output targets for 2-300 product groups Estimate input reqs. Estimate input reqs. Central ministries set production targets Estimate input reqs. Enterprises Material Balances Projected Supplies Estimated Demands
Remedies for Deficit Commodities • Increase planned output • increase imports • draw upon stocks • reduce inter-industry demands • reduce final (household) demands
Pre-1990 a largely closed economic bloc • Most trade within the bloc • monopolistic state agencies controlled all foreign exchange transactions • total protection against foreign competition despite low formal tariff and non-tariff barriers
Why the unsatisfactory growth and well-being performance? • Jan Winieki. 1986. Are Soviet-type economies entering an era of long term decline? Soviet Studies 38(3):325-348. • Jeffrey Sachs. 1996. Notes on the life-cycle of state-led industria-lization, Japan and the World Economy 8:153-174.
A fundamental problem • No private owners to monitor the performance of workers and managers • can’t rely on managers. Have little interest in resisting worker demands for higher compensation • state bureaucracy has frequently not performed this role well
Incentive Structure Inflexibility of institutional structure Lack of Specialization Slowness to Innovate Ability to Mobilize Resources for Large Projects Jan Winieki’s model Soviet-style Economic Organization
Sachs’ elaboration on this theme • State enterprise was most successful in promoting mass production, homogeneous heavy industry and least successful in services • Not surprising, growth rates slowed when they reached development levels where specialized service activity tends to grow rapidly.
Symptoms of these weaknesses • High resource intensity • deteriorating investment performance • bloated share of industrial sector in GDP • increasing demand for imports of raw materials, parts and components, technology • deteriorating export performance