1 / 10

Open Access to Humanities Data — a scholarly perspective

Open Access to Humanities Data — a scholarly perspective . Laurent Romary Inria — French national research center in computer science Humboldt University Berlin. Personal background. Former chair of the TEI council and current chair of ISO committee TC 37/SC 4 (language resources)

sovann
Download Presentation

Open Access to Humanities Data — a scholarly perspective

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Open Access to Humanities Data —a scholarly perspective Laurent Romary Inria — French national research center in computer science Humboldt University Berlin

  2. Personal background • Former chair of the TEI council and current chair of ISO committee TC 37/SC 4 (language resources) • Importance of standards for a sustainable digital humanities landscape • Advisor for scientific information at Inria • Deposit mandate issued in Jan. 2013 • Director of DARIAH — European e-infrastructure in the arts and humanities • Facilitating the deployment of digital methods and content in the humanities

  3. Context • Huge progress on open access to publications • Increasing role of publication repositories — cf. TARA at TCD, HAL in France etc. • Towards new publication models (from blogs to epi-journals) • Sharing data in the humanities is not the mainstream (yet) • We need to understand why in order to take action • Scholarly reluctance, lack of recognition, missing technical infrastructure?

  4. Is it wise to openly share Humanities data? • Why would it be unwise? • Data can be “stolen” by other scholars • Is there a risk that other scholar carry out the same research? • People could sell the data, publish it? • WTH, as long as it does not prevent data to be freely available elsewhere • A sensible issue: digital editions, in depth annotations • Early scholarly recognition • Competition with traditional publication means • Scholars still promise a book in their project applications • Is it wise not to openly share humanities data? … whenever it is possible

  5. What benefits accrue from open access to Humanities data for researchers, and for citizen? • Pooling scholarly results • Avoid duplication of work on primary sources • Comparing and checking result • Towards more evidence in the humanities • Showing that hard work is being done • Cf. more visibility to humanities research in the wide public • Humanities data are cultural heritage data • General public interest

  6. If this data is made available online for free, who is funding this free access? • This is usually not an issue in other scientific fields • Scientific data management as part of research infrastructures • Open access is just a dimension of the infrastructure • Devil’s advocate • There could be some nice business to be made with cultural heritage data… • But is this our business? • Facing the reality • We may have to pay archives, libraries or publishers…. Or maybe not.

  7. Is open access to Humanities data sustainable? • A general technical question for digital information • Legibility: standards • Preservation: long term archiving • Technical availability and access • A possible model: the library • Open access to humanities data as part of the scientific information services within universities, etc. • A need for a long-term strategy within institutions

  8. What sort of use and re-use is made of shared Humanities data? • Why would we care? • Commercial re-use • Diverted interpretations • Bad scholarly practices in general • A general trust in scholarly principles • Going digital has not changed human nature • Scholars need attribution (and thus recognition) — CC-BY as a baseline • Greg Crane: “I consider open data to be essential for emerging digital scholarship - researchers must be free to download, analyze, annotate, modify, and then republish their textual sources. ”

  9. What are the major challenges of sharing Humanities data? • Systemic change in practices in the humanities • Technical infrastructure • We need more structures like the DRI • Cultural change • Scholarly fame and the “book” • Political evolution (funding agencies, assessment panels, recruiting panels and academies) • Recognition of digital scholarly acheivements

  10. Humanities data manifesto? • Scholarly editions of primary sources are an essential component of the research process in the humanities • Digital editions should be published as early as possible and be taken into account in the assessment of scholarly achievements • Traditional publishing in print (if any) should be accompanied by an openly accessible online version

More Related