1 / 12

Plans and Situated Actions

Plans and Situated Actions. Planning View. Plans are prerequisite to and prescribe action at every level of detail Plans must exist, even if changed during execution, for action to occur Mutual intelligibility results from recognition of plans and shared knowledge. Plan Generation.

sovann
Download Presentation

Plans and Situated Actions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Plans and Situated Actions

  2. Planning View • Plans are prerequisite to and prescribe action at every level of detail • Plans must exist, even if changed during execution, for action to occur • Mutual intelligibility results from recognition of plans and shared knowledge

  3. Plan Generation • Early robot planner • STRIPS – backward chaining planner • PLANEX • modeled execution of STRIPS plan by computing cumulative error • When error exceeded threshold, camera would be used to more accurately determine position • NOAH • Planning where human apprentice is executing plan • Needed to communicate about state of world and relation of goals and actions

  4. Interaction and Plan Recognition • Interaction (e.g. communication) requires planning where other actors are environmental conditions • Recognition of plans requires • Generating hypotheses • Modifying or replacing as new evidence is observed • Plans and Intentions • Intention – “the uncompleted part of a plan whose execution has already begun”

  5. Speech Acts • Language is a form of action • Communication subsumed by planning • Actors have • A model of the world • Model of one another’s model of the world • Goals in changing other’s model • Searle’s speech acts as precondition -> outcomes rules • Searle argued against possibility of rule-based inference of meaning • How much knowledge is needed to understand conversation • Example of implied request for break

  6. Background Knowledge • Where does observation end and interpretation begin? • Represent knowledge in domains and general “common sense” • Scripts as representation of common sense situations • But how do scripts recover from errors/interruptions • Error recovery scripts

  7. Relevance • Is the information relevant to a situation enumerable? • Deciding what to include is ad hoc • What about tacit knowledge? • Communication must reflect principle of communicative economy • Things said or not said based on assumptions of other’s understanding • Design communication vs. design documentation • Garfinkel’s students unable to write “everything” communicated in short conversation because act of creating list enlarged the content • Assumptions only exist when premise is questioned

  8. Situated Action • Plans are part of context for practical activity • One definition: • Every course of action depends in essential ways on its material and social circumstances • Implications • Need to study how people use circumstances to achieve intelligent action rather than abstract action away from circumstances • How people produce and find evidence for plans in the course of action rather than build a theory of action out of a theory of plans

  9. Plans as Representation of Action • Plans abstract away and generalize potential/previous actions • Example of canoe • Post hoc analysis may turn actions into plan • Representation and breakdown • Heidegger's notion of unreflective action, breakdown, and reflection • Only during reflection are plans made conscious • When situated action becomes problematic then plans are used for deliberation

  10. Practical Objectivity of Situations • Changing views in social science • Move from traditional view of external, antecedent, and coercive social facts influencing action to one of actions occurring in a world “under interpretation” • Ethnomethodology • Studies methods of society in making sense of the world • Asks how objective grounding is accomplished • Looks to describe the practices that produce the typifications which make schemas and rules • Makes common sense the product rather than the precondition of action

  11. Indexicality of Language • Language takes on meaning by being embedded in the world • Indexical expressions rely on situation for significance • Pronouns, tenses, time/place adverbs, deictic references, metaphor? • “That is a nice one” => nice is also indexical • Indefinite range of features can influence interpretation • Instructions can never be fully articulated and must be interpreted by the instruction follower

  12. Mutual Intelligibility of Action • Language and action are part of the situation • Study of work practices (things typically taken for granted) • Documentary method • Ascribe intent based on evidence • Interpretation of evidence in ascribed intent • Not reducible to rules about action and context • Example of sense making by students receiving random yes/no answers from “counselor” • Social structure • Not a prescribed set of rules/alternatives • Emerges from idiosyncratic interactions • This emergence should be focus of social science

More Related