1 / 16

Registries as a base for pan-European health services research in the field of pain

This presentation discusses the use of medical registries as a foundation for conducting pan-European health services research in the field of pain. It explores the benefits of using registries for evaluating patient outcomes, assessing treatment efficacy, studying epidemiology of pain, and more. The presentation also highlights the PAIN-OUT registry and its contributions to research in pain management.

spurlockj
Download Presentation

Registries as a base for pan-European health services research in the field of pain

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Registries as a base for pan-European health services research in the field of pain Winfried Meissner, M.D. Ruth Zaslansky, D.Sc. Dept. of Anaesthesia & Intensive Care University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany

  2. Disclosure Statement of conflict of interest in the context of the subject of this presentation Within the past 12 months, I or my spouse/partner have had following financial interest/arrangement(s) or affiliation(s) below. Affiliation/Financial Relationship Company Support for travel European Commission Honoraria for lectures …………………… Honoraria for advisory board activities …………………… Participation in clinical trials …………………… Research funding European Commission Financial shares and options …………………… …………………………….. ……………………

  3. Medical Registries “.. a system that uses observational methods with a common formation of variables to evaluate a population defined by a particular disease or condition and that serves scientists, clinicians or policy-makers.” Registries for Evaluating Patient Oucomes: A User‘s Guilde 2007 • Trauma registries - since 1920s • Cancer registries - since 1960s

  4. RCTs Registries • Highly selected population • All variables well controlled • Asses efficacy of treatments under ideal conditions • Findings don‘t generalize well to everyday practice • Underpowered to detect complications, rare situations & adverse events • Mirrors daily practice • Large number of cases • Infomation on rare cases, complications & adverse effects • Uncontrolled confounders • No randomisation • Causality? + + - -

  5. 7th EU Framework Programme:PAIN-OUT

  6. Data from clinical sites internationally Registry Research Quality improvement Clinicians, researchers, epidemiologists, hospital administrators, policy makers Feedback/Benchmarking, Clinical Decision Support,Knowledge Library

  7. Project tools: Patient reported OUTCOMES Validated questionnaire Uniform variables for all patients Questionnaire in 18 languages + Clinical data Patients assessed on the first day after surgery

  8. PAIN OUT & QUIPS: The International Acute Pain Registry 200 sites and >250,000 datasets

  9. Registries as a base for research in the field of pain Registries can be used to study • Epidemiology of pain (incidence/prevalence) • Variation of care (adherence to guidelines etc.) • Areas of under-, overtreatment • Long-time outcome (e.g., persistent postoperative pain, QoL) • Cultural/ethnic differences • Cost/benefit or risk/benefit ratio • Effectiveness of interventions Registries can be used for • Hypothesis generating • Detecting risks / complications (e.g., pharmacovigilance)

  10. 1561 patients registered in the QUIPS database between 1.2009 –1.2011 as undergoing LapC 20% of patients were treated according to all the recommendations Variation of care (e.g. adherence to guidelines)

  11. Study long-term outcomes (e.g., persistent postoperative pain)

  12. Cultural differences

  13. Cultural differences • Non praying: n=3948 • Praying: n=855

  14. Cultural differences * (p=0.001)

  15. PAIN OUT • Established an international platform for research in pain • Created a web-based, user-friendly system for feedback and benchmarking of patient-reported outcomes • Created a large & constantly growing database which will permit: - powerful data analysis - hypothesis generating • Complement Randomized Controlled Studies

  16. EU clinical and research partners Prof N Rawal, Dr R Backstrom, Prof Funk, Sweden Prof R Langford, Dr K Ullrich, Dr R Taylor UK Prof M Puig, Spain Dr D Fletcher, France Prof C Konrad, Switzerland Prof T Volk, Prof E Pogatzki-Zahn, Dr A Kopf, Germany Dr L Fodor, Romania Dr S Brill, Israel Dr Leykin, Italy Dr C Engel, Germany I Buchholtz, Germany www.pain-out.eu (see also abstract booklet)

More Related