250 likes | 451 Views
Expectations on the rural development programme and networking 2014-2020. Michael Pielke Unit G1: Consistency of Rural Development Swedish Rural Development Network Meeting Stockholm 26/11/2013. Calendar for the new Rural Development Policy. November 2010. October 2011. April 2013.
E N D
Expectations on the rural development programme and networking 2014-2020 • Michael Pielke • Unit G1: Consistency of Rural Development • Swedish Rural Development Network Meeting • Stockholm 26/11/2013
Calendar for the new Rural Development Policy • November 2010 • October 2011 • April 2013 • 26 June 2013 • November 2013
Calendar for the new Rural Development Policy (2) • December 2013 • Dec 2013 / Jan 2014 • May/June 2014 • June 2014
Main elements of the reform More effective rural development policy Better co-ordination with other EU funds Reinforced strategic programming Changes to the measure menu
Better co-ordination with other EU funds European Level • Common Provisions Regulation for ESI Funds • Covering the EAFRD, ERDF, ESF, CF, EMFF • Reflecting EU 2020 Strategy through 11 common thematic objectives to be addressed by key actions for each of the funds National Level • Partnership Agreement • National document outlining the intended use of the funds in the pursuit of EU 2020 objectives National or Regional Level • Rural Development Programme(s) • (+ other funds' "operational programmes")
Reinforced strategic programming 6 Union priorities for rural development 1. Knowledge transfer / innovationin agriculture, forestry, rural areas 2. Viability of all types of farming in all regions; innovative farm technologies; Sustainable management of forests 3. Food chain organisation, animal welfare, risk management in agriculture 4. Ecosystems related to agriculture and forestry 5. Resource efficiency, low-carbon / climate-resilient economy in agriculture, food and forestry sectors 6. Social inclusion, poverty reduction and economic development in rural areas 8
Reinforced strategic programming • Grouping of measures and indicators per focus areas: an example Priority 5: Promoting resource efficiency and supporting the shift towards a low-carbon and climate-resilient economy in agriculture, food and forestry sectors Focus areas Grouping of relevant measures Efficiency in water use • Investments in physical assets • Farm and business development • Village renewal and basic infrastructure • Knowledge transfer • Advisory services • Investments in forest area development • Co-operation (new technologies) • [….] Measure details (example) Efficiency in energy use • Indicative list of relevant • operations to be supported • - Eligibility rules • - Aid intensities • Beneficiaries • Indicative budget • Other conditions, etc. Supply and use of renewable energy Reducing GHG and ammonia emissions Carbon conservation and sequestration Indicators Targets (result) Planned expenditure Planned outputs
Required minimum budgetary allocations A minimum amount of the total EAFRD contribution to the RDP must be reserved as follows: At least 30% for: environment- and climate-related investments (Article 18) forestry measures (Articles 22-27 and Article 35) agri-environment-climate (Article 29) organic farming (Article 30) Natura 2000 payments (Article 31 with the exception of WFD related payments) Payments in areas facing natural constraints (ANCs - Articles 32-33) At least 5% for Leader Nota bene: These provisions do not apply to the outermost regions and the overseas territories • Reinforced strategic programming
Other considerations "Show me the money" • Total EAFRD amount 2014-2020: € 84,936 M • Basic maximum co-financing rate = 53 % • Higher maximum rates for various regions • Less developed regions, outermost regions, smaller Aegean Islands, transition regions • Higher maximum rates for certain measures • Knowledge transfer (art. 15), producer groups (art. 28), co-operation (art. 36), LEADER • Higher maximum rate for operations contributing to environment- and climate-related objectives • Under arts. 18, 23, 24, 29, 30, 31 (3 / 4), 32, 35 • Higher rates in various other circumstances • E.g. funds transferred from Pillar I (100 %)
Changes to the • measure menu • Measures: the overall approach • Some measures from 2007-13 rolled together for better visibility • Many adjustments to scope, eligibility conditions, aid amounts etc. of existing measures, e.g.: • Shorter contracts for agri-environment-climate measure after initial 5-year phase • New measures to cover emerging needs, e.g.: • Co-operation (art. 36) – various forms of joint activity to deliver economic, environmental & social benefits; technological development (including for European Innovation Partnership) • Risk management (art. 37) – insurance, mutual funds, income stabilisation tool
Farm and business development (art. 20) 3 types of operations: Setting-up aid for: Young Farmers Conditional on the submission of a business plan, which has to start being implemented within 9 months from the date of the decision granting the aid. Non-agricultural activities in rural areas: extended from micro- to small businesses) Development of small farms:extended to all "small" farms in EU - defined by Member States Investments in non-agricultural activities Support for farm restructuring Annual or one-off payments for farmers eligible for the small farmers scheme under Pillar 1 who permanently transfer their holding to another farmer Aid rates: 70.000per young farmer 70.000 per beneficiary who diversifies 15.000 per small farm for development operations • RD measures
Changes to the • measure menu Measure example: Co-operation (art. 36) Pilot projects Experimental development / refinement Sharing facilities, resources Environment / climate change Co-operation Encouraging joint solutions Provision of biomass Tourism services Short supply chains, local markets Forest management plans Non-LEADER local development strategies Social farming 15
Changes to the • measure menu LEADER in rural development programmes • constitutes a specific element of CLLD to be included obligatory in a RDP: • preparatory support; • implementation of operations under the CLLD strategy; • preparation and implementation of co-operation activities of the LAG; • running costs; • animation costs. • LEADER should not be limited to standard RD measures. • Streamlined LEADER cooperation • Compulsory with a minimum of 5% of the EAFRD funding per programme and possibility of higher co-financing rates 16
RD measures Advantages of the common CLLD approach for LEADER • Common local development approach in the ESI-Funds facilitates integrated territorial development • Harmonised rules for design and implementation of CLLD • "Multi-funded" LEADER strategies enable various EU policies to contribute to local development according to their policy objectives ERDF Rural area EAFRD ESF • Addedvaluefor rural areas: broaderstrategiesandLocal Action Group partnerships, improvementof rural-urban relations, synergieswithFisheriesLocal Action Groups TOP-DOWN BOTTOM-UP 17
RD measures Advantages of the common CLLD approach for LEADER • Common methodology strengthens the LEADER approach (Art. 28-31 CPR) • Greater focus on capacity building and animation • Stronger local strategies • Better LAG governance: strengthening the participation of the private sector in the partnerships TOP-DOWN BOTTOM-UP 18
Changes to the • measure menu EIP on Agricultural Productivity and Sustainability • A new facility for building bridges between research and practice, whilst encouraging innovation • Acts through operational groups carrying out innovative projects • Model story of an operational group: a farmer has an innovative idea but does not have means to develop it. He/she joins forces with e.g. a scientist, a farm advisor and a technology supplier and they set up an operational group. The idea is developed and shared via the networks. EAFRD co-finances project-specific costs and costs of co-operation. • Supported by a national and EU network • National network can be part of the Rural Network • Key RD measures for implementing the EIP: • Co-operation • Investments (various measures) • Knowledge transfer • Advisory services
Networking • National Rural Networks • European network for rural development- aims to: • increase the involvement of all stakeholders in the implementation • improve the quality of rural development programmes • informing the broader public on the benefits of RD policy • support the evaluation of rural development programmes • EIP network – aims to: • facilitate the exchange of expertise and good practices; • establish a dialogue between farmers and the research community and facilitate the inclusion of all stakeholders in the knowledge exchange process