210 likes | 417 Views
Government of Malawi UNDP-UNEP Poverty- Environment Initiative. The UNDP-UNEP PEI supports Government to:Include environmental sustainability as a core objective in national development planning (e.g. Malawi Growth and Development Strategy)
E N D
1.
2. Government of MalawiUNDP-UNEP Poverty- Environment Initiative PEI Program Objectives
Key Achievements related to Economic Valuation of ENRM
Objectives and Methodology
Key Findings/Recommendations
Policy Impact
Challenges and Response
Lessons Learned
Next Steps
3. Government of MalawiUNDP-UNEP Poverty- Environment Initiative The UNDP-UNEP PEI supports Government to:
Include environmental sustainability as a core objective in national development planning (e.g. Malawi Growth and Development Strategy) & implementation so that poverty reduction and other economic development objectives are not undermined by the unsustainable use of natural resources.
Build capacity so that decision-makers know:
How environmental sustainability contributes to development; and
How to include environmental sustainability in development planning & implementation.
4. Government of Malawi UNDP-UNEP Poverty- Environment Initiative Draft report presented to and approved by the PEI Technical Committee
Draft report presented to a national consultative workshop
Consultants currently incorporating comments
Report yet to be presented to the Steering Committee for vetting
5. Government of Malawi UNDP-UNEP Poverty- Environment Initiative The report has been used in drafting the socioeconomic chapter for the Environmental Outlook Report
The draft report has already generated a lot of debate in the media
6. Study Context About 80% of Malawians depend on renewable natural resources for subsistence and income
Dependence on rain-fed agriculture implies significant role of natural resources
Sustainable management of key natural resources is crucial
7. Study Context Attainment of MGDS targets could be threatened by unsustainable use and degradation of natural resources
Hence “conservation of natural resource base” is an MGDS sub-theme under Theme 1
This buttresses Goal 7 of MDGs
The MPEI complementing Government efforts
The Economic Study seeks to support evidence-based policy-making and resource allocation
8. Objectives of the Economic Study Provide evidence on the costs and benefits of natural resource management
Examine the link between natural resource management ? poverty reduction, economic well-being & development
Assess net benefits of key interventions that encourage sustainable natural resource use
9. Study Design and General Methodology Desk reviews and interviews
Characteristics
Significance
Threats/loss
Policies
Case studies in 3 catchments
Linthipe
Lower Shire
Middle Shire
? Visits
? Analyses of satellite images for 1994-2008
10. Key Findings
National GDP figures are understated:
11. Malawi losing $191m (5.3%) of GDP annually!
MPEI Economic Study Report #1
12. Key Findings Malawi is losing significantly!
5.3% of GDP annually ($191m) at 2007 prices
More than allocation to key ministries in 2009
Education: $175.3 million
Health: $163.6 million
28% of this ($54 million) is due to reduced yields from soil loss
$600m over 10 years @ 10% discount rate
$200 per household
13. Key Findings Adjusted Net Savings (ANS)
= green accounting rate of national wealth creation
= national saving + human capital formation – unrenewed NR use
WB estimate = 12.24% of GNI
WB/Authors = 7.14% of GNI
Thus, environmental and natural resource degradation implies that wealth is being created more slowly
At 4.87% of GNI, educational expenditure is outweighed by natural resource degradation (5.1% of GNI)
14. Some implications: yield loss Recall: Yield loss due to soil degradation = $54m p.a.
Conservatively, this reduces agricultural yields by 6%
Other studies document higher losses
4-11% p.a. (WB, 1992)
8-25% p.a. (Bishop, 1995)
Benin et al (2008) argue:
6% improvement in agricultural yields during 2005-2015, would increase overall GDP growth from 3.2% to 4.8% p.a.
? proportion in poverty falling to 34.5% by 2015 i.e. the incidence of poverty falls 12.5% resulting in 1.88 million people being lifted above the poverty line by 2015
15. Some implications: Overall
Benin et al (2008) consider GDP growth of 4.2% p.a. above the baseline case.
Over 2004 – 2015, the proportion in poverty would be halved from its 1990 level – to 25.2%
i.e. sustainable NR use could have enabled the MDG1 target to be reached
If the lost economic value from unsustainable resource use each year across all ENRM sectors (5.3% of GDP) is converted into economic growth, the impact on poverty would be much larger
16. Government of MalawiUNDP-UNEP Poverty- Environment Initiative
Policies likely to be affected/adjusted.
Review of the Malawi Growth and Development Strategy (MGDS)
Review of the Policy Forestry 1996
Budget Guidelines
Public Environmental Expenditure Review (PEER) in the offing
Incorporation of ENRM into the Guide to Executive Decision Making
Fisheries and Aquaculture Management Act
17. Government of Malawi UNDP-UNEP Poverty- Environment Initiative
18. Government of Malawi UNDP-UNEP Poverty- Environment Initiative The consultative process requires heavy investment and patience
The need to involve all stakeholders especially those that may challenge the results
There is great interest to mobilise evidence for the cost of sustainable use of natural resources in Malawi
The analysis should be quite instrumental in convincing decision makers to invest in ENRM
19. Government of MalawiUNDP-UNEP Poverty- Environment Initiative Vetting of the report by the Steering Committee
Capacity building for research institutions
Capacity building for Cabinet and Parliamentary Committee
Capacity building for journalists
Advocacy using media and CSOs
Monitoring on the use of the report
20. Government of MalawiUNDP-UNEP Poverty- Environment Initiative Based on the results of the study, the PEI Country Team is improving its work in order to help promote behavioral change and improved plans, policies, budgets and monitoring frameworks
Involvement of different stakeholders to deliberate on the report
Inclusion of the academia on the use of the report
Moving in to position issues of ENRM in all current developments e.g. ASWAp, MGDS
Using the report to lobby for incorporation of ENRM in Government Policies and Planning including in Budgetary frameworks
21. Government of MalawiUNDP-UNEP Poverty- Environment Initiative Thank you for listening
http://www.unpei.org/programmes/country_profiles/malawi.asp