1 / 8

HFA Monitoring and Progress Reporting

HFA Monitoring and Progress Reporting. 2007-2009 Results of First HFA Biennial Review of Progress Shefali Juneja UNISDR, Geneva. Global 2007-09 HFA Review Process. Territorial Dimensions: National: 62 countries, online HFA Monitor tool Regional: 10 inter-governmental organisations

starr
Download Presentation

HFA Monitoring and Progress Reporting

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. HFA Monitoring and Progress Reporting

  2. 2007-2009Results of First HFA Biennial Reviewof ProgressShefali JunejaUNISDR, Geneva

  3. Global 2007-09 HFA Review Process Territorial Dimensions: • National: 62 countries, online HFA Monitor tool • Regional: 10 inter-governmental organisations • Global: More than 30 ISDR system partners and platforms Thematic Dimensions: • Early warning: WMO • Environment: UNEP • Urban risk: EMI • Gender: UNISDR, Gender Network • Recovery: UNDP BCPR, OCHA, IRP

  4. Key components of HFA Monitor • 3 strategic goals: assess ‘current national priorities’ • 5 priorities for action: assess progress on 22 ‘core indicators’ against five levels of progress • 5 ‘drivers of progress’: assess level of reliance on key ‘catalysts’ for risk reduction • 3 future outlook statements: re-assess current priorities and project future strategies

  5. … and levels of progress • Level 1: Minor progress with few signs of forward action or policy commitment • Level 2: Some progress, but without systematic policy and/ or institutional commitment • Level 3: Institutional commitment attained, but achievements are neither comprehensive nor substantial • Level 4: Substantial achievement attained but with recognised limitations in capacities and resources • Level 5: Comprehensive achievement with sustained commitment and capacities at all levels

  6. Findings of the 2007-09 Global HFA Review • Significant progress: HFA Priority 1, 5 Strengthening institutional capacities, systems, policies and legislation for disaster risk reduction; technical and institutional capacities for disaster preparedness, contingency plans • Consistent progress: HFA Priority 2 Identification, assessment and monitoring of disaster risks; enhancement of early warning systems • Weak progress: HFA Priority 3 and 4 Knowledge, innovation and education, raising awareness; in particular mainstreaming of disaster risk reduction into economic, social, urban, rural, environmental, infrastructure planning

  7. Progress reported by Income classification

  8. Progress reported by Regions • Consistently high progress: Europe, Pacific • Consistent but unsatisfactory progress: Asia, Latin America, Pacific • Weak progress: Africa

More Related