1 / 16

Potomac Maritime LLC

2010 International Food Aid & Development Conference August 2-4, 2010 Kansas City, Missouri Sponsored by the USDA and USAID Vessel Loading Observation Break-Out Session Presentation by H. Keith Powell. Potomac Maritime LLC. - Ship Broker with offices in Washington DC and Houston, Texas

starr
Download Presentation

Potomac Maritime LLC

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 2010 International Food Aid & Development ConferenceAugust 2-4, 2010Kansas City, MissouriSponsored by the USDA and USAID • Vessel Loading Observation Break-Out Session • Presentation • by • H. Keith Powell

  2. Potomac Maritime LLC • - Ship Broker with offices in Washington DC and Houston, Texas • - Represents US flag and Non US Flag Ship Owners participating in the US • Government food AID Programs • - Major Clients: Maersk Line, Maersk Line Limited and Sealift, Inc

  3. What does a Ship Broker Do? • > Market Analysis • > Contract Administration • > Prepare and Submit Freight Bids • > Keep various parties informed of Vessel positions • > Collect Freight Monies due to Carriers • > Logistical Support • > Problem Solve

  4. Other Ship Brokers Participating in the Program: Phoenix Chartering Euro America International Navigation Next Wave Potomac Shipping

  5. Potomac Maritime Broker at Work!

  6. Other Ship Brokers at Work!

  7. Delayed Cargo Arrival / Off Grade Cargo: Action Required: > Swap Out Cargo Between Vessels or Programs > Expedite Deliveries > Flexibility from Cooperating Sponsors > Quick Decisions from Decision Makers Problem Solving: Load Port Challenges

  8. Infestation of Cargo at Load Port: -Current Contract Terms Place Burden on Carrier - Infestation Either Latent and in Cargo at Time of Delivery to Port or -Cargo Becomes Infested While in the Load Port Warehouse - Carrier is Responsible for Fumigating Cargo in Warehouse, on Board Vessel or in Containers Problem Solving: Load Port Challenges

  9. Infestation of Cargo at Load Port: New Approach:US Government pays for any fumigation required at load port (in warehouse or on board vessel or in container) Rational: > Cheaper... ? Perhaps. USG already paying cost to Carriers > USG can possibly negotiate better fumigation cost than individual Carriers > More Proactive Approach to Issue > Focus is on Delivering Cargo Free of Infestation > Commercially Shipper Responsible for Fumigation of Cargo Problem Solving: Load Port Challenges

  10. Public Enemy Number 1

  11. Rodent Infestation of Cargo at Load Port: -Clear Understanding of Various Parties Responsibilities: Port Authority Stevedores Suppliers Ocean Carrier Shipper US Government - Contractually Cargo is in the care and custody of the Ocean Carrier - Physically cargo in the Possession of the Stevedores - Ocean Carrier does not have direct control of the Cargo - must work through Stevedores as it’s subcontractor Problem Solving: Load Port Challenges

  12. Rodent Infestation of Cargo at Load Port: Ocean Carrier’s Main Concerns: -Important that only clean cargo being loaded on vessel - If a higher level inspection procedure is to be used - establish well in advance of vessel loading - Any delay in handling the cargo and loading the vessel is minimized or eliminated altogether Problem Solving: Load Port Challenges

  13. Rodent Infestation of Cargo at Load Port: Suggestions: >USDA to establish standards for cleanliness and rodent remediation procedures for all terminals handling US Government Food Aid > USDA to conduct regular terminal inspections to ensure compliance > If there is a higher level of inspection required prior to loading – clearly spell out the procedure / protocol in the freight tender > This should help avoid problems developing at time of vessel loading which can result in expensive equipment and vessel delays Problem Solving: Load Port Challenges

  14. Cargo Claims at Load Port: Current Contract Terms holds Ocean Carrier responsible for cargo damage that occurs at the load port with zero tolerance for loss Result: > Carriers must increase their rates to cover potential for cargo claims yet they have no direct physical control over cargo Cargo is in the possession of the stevedore / terminal operator who is subcontractor to cargo Suppliers for rail car unloading and Ocean Carrier for loading vessel or stuffing containers Problem Solving: Load Port Challenges

  15. Cargo Claims at Load Port: Suggestion: Make Terminal Operator directly responsible for any load port damage Rational: > Direct accountability > No free lunch – Freight rates currently include provisions for potential claims and if suggestion adopted stevedores rates will include provision for potential claims > BUT ... Holding the party responsible that is in direct control of the cargo, should promote more effective methods for minimizing cargo damage and loss > For Stevedores – Minimizing cargo claims can become a competitive advantage versus just a cost of doing business Problem Solving: Load Port Challenges

  16. Potomac Maritime LLC • Thank you for listening and enjoy the Conference

More Related