470 likes | 683 Views
New Invasive and non-Invasive Diagnostic Methods in Paediatric Respiratory Diseases. Andrew Bush MD FRCP FRCPCH Imperial School of Medicine & Royal Brompton Hospital. Email: a.bush@rbht.nhs.uk. New Methods In Paediatric Respiratory Diseases. Ethical Issues in using Innovative Methods
E N D
New Invasive and non-Invasive Diagnostic Methods in Paediatric Respiratory Diseases Andrew Bush MD FRCP FRCPCH Imperial School of Medicine & Royal Brompton Hospital Email: a.bush@rbht.nhs.uk
New Methods In Paediatric Respiratory Diseases • Ethical Issues in using Innovative Methods • Measuring Inflammation: General • Measuring Inflammation: Non-invasive • Measuring Inflammation: Invasive • Summary and Conclusions
Paediatric Ethical issues:General Principles • Must do adult studies before children • Research in children only if unavoidable • Risks are not permitted without benefit • Adults cannot consent to risk their children • Bribery is not allowed • Children can be altruistic, and this should be permitted
Paediatric Ethical issues:General Principles • Testing involves not just the child, but the extended family - consent issues for all • Should a child be tested for carrier status? • Should a child be tested for an incurable condition? • Should DNA from a child be stored?
New Methods In Paediatric Respiratory Diseases • Ethical Issues in using Innovative Methods • Measuring Inflammation: General • Measuring Inflammation: Non-invasive • Measuring Inflammation: Invasive • Summary and Conclusions
Biopsy • Lungs • Airway wall and • lumen • Lung • parenchyma • Intravascular • events EBC Exhaled breath Sputum FOB, BAL, Bx Bone marrow TBB Adhesion molecules Bone marrow signals Blood sample Urine tests Tests to Assess Different Aspects of Inflammation
The Perfect “Inflammometer” • Cheap • Easy to maintain and calibrate • Completely non-invasive • Easy to use, no co-operation needed • Direct measurement of all relevant aspects of inflammation • Rapid availability of answers
Facets of Inflammation • Cellular mechanisms • Resident cells – epithelial, fibroblasts, myofibroblasts • Invading cells – eosinophil, neutrophil, mixed • Chemical mechanisms • Cytokines, chemokines • Lipid mediators, e.g.leukotrienes • Oxidative stress • Neurogenic mechanisms • NANC system
Invasive FOB, BAL, Bronchial biopsy, (TBB) (Blood tests) Non-invasive Exhaled breath (eNO) Induced sputum Exhaled breath condensate (BHR) How to Measure Inflammation
Mechanisms vs. Individuals • Statistically significant differences between groups • May help predict mechanisms (beware guilt by association) • No use for clinic decisions
New Methods In Paediatric Respiratory Diseases • Ethical Issues in using Innovative Methods • Measuring Inflammation: General • Measuring Inflammation: Non-invasive • Measuring Inflammation: Invasive • Summary and Conclusions
Alveolar and Airway NO • Measure eNO and hence NO production at multiple flow rates • Slope of line gives airway production • Extrapolated intercept gives alveolar production • Still needs to be evaluated in children JAP 1999; 87: 1532-42 BlueJ 2001; 163: 1557-61
eNO – What does it mean? • Measurement conditions crucial • Good for looking at group mechanisms • Variable relationship with airway eosinophilia • MAY be useful in monitoring asthma, but at best indirect • Multiple flow rate measurements need further work
EBC – What does it Mean? • Many molecules can be measured • Assay more important than collection methods • No value monitoring inhaled steroid reduction • Still unclear if any PRACTICAL value
Sputum induction A dosimeter is used to administer a measured quantity of hypertonic saline
Inflammation in Severe Asthma • Sputum induction (3.5% saline) in 40 children, symptomatic despite > 1 mg FP/day • Two excluded as FEV1 < 65%; all given β-2 agonist prior to procedure • 28/38 (74%) sample obtained
Inflammation in Severe Asthma Conclusion: eosinophilic inflammation overcalled by eNO
Inflammation in Severe Asthma • 7/38 symptomatic during induction, only 3 Δ FEV1 > -20% • Only 9/28 had persistent inflammation • 6 eosinophilic (eosins > 2.5%) • 3 non-eosinophilic (neutrophils > 54%) Conclusion: inflammation apparently not that common
Diagnosing asthma: role of exhaled nitric oxideSmith et al. AJRCCM., 2004 • Consecutive patients referred by GP ?asthma • Diagnostic work-up over three study visits: • twice-daily peak flow measurements (7days) • spirometry • bronchodilator response (FEV1) • bronchial challenge testing (AHR) • induced sputum analysis • response (peak flows and FEV1) to pred 30 mg/day for 2 weeks
Malmberget al eNO eNO Smithet al Deykinet al PC20 methacholine eNO (42ml/sec) eNO (500ml/sec) ROC Curves for eNO As Diagnostic Test: Comparisons Between Studies Berkmanet al eNO Dupontet al eNO eNO
Managing asthma by normalising sputum eosinophils in adults Lancet 2002; 360: 1715-21
Non-invasive Markers to Monitor Steroid Reduction BlueJ 2005; 171: 1077-82
Titrating Steroids on Exhaled Nitric Oxide in Asthmatic Children: a Randomized Controlled Trial. Pijnenburg et al. AJRCCM, 2005 85 atopic asthmatic children. ICS dose in FENO group: increase if >30ppb; no change if <30ppb and symptoms still present; decrease if <30ppb and reduced symptoms. P = 0.04 P = NS FENO Symptoms A a a a Symptoms FENO Changes in PD20 methacholine Changes in ICS dose (micrograms)
New Methods In Paediatric Respiratory Diseases • Ethical Issues in using Innovative Methods • Measuring Inflammation: General • Measuring Inflammation: Non-invasive • Measuring Inflammation: Invasive • Summary and Conclusions
Visit two: FOB • Assess reversible factors • Assess symptoms, use of rescue medication • Spirometry, PC20, reversibility • Induced sputum, eNO • FOB, BAL, biopsy Intramuscular Triamcinolone The Difficult Asthma Protocol Visit one: MDT Assessment • Drug delivery device • Home visit: environment • School visit: bullying? • Assess compliance • Psychological assessment 1-2 months 4-6 weeks Visit three: Decision time • Assess symptoms, diary card, and use of rescue medication • Spirometry, PC20, reversibility • Induced sputum, eNO • Serum cortisol assay
r = 0.67 p = 0.001 100.0 10.0 Eosinophil score (%) 1.0 Evidence of adherence Adherence unknown 0.1 1 10 100 FENO (ppb) Correlation between FENO and eosinophils in biopsy
Steroid sensitive (eosinophilic) inflammation Normal lung function No BHR No inflammation on visit 2 biopsy Treatment approach Wean steroids (Cyclosporin A if intolerable side-effects) Phenotype Specific Asthma Treatment
Steroid resistant eosinophilic inflammation Symptomatic Eosinophilic biopsy on visit 2 (steroid receptor abnormalities) Adherence to oral steroids Treatment approach Cyclosporin A Other steroid sparing agent Phenotype Specific Asthma Treatment
Neutrophilic inflammation Symptomatic Neutrophilic inflammation on visit 2 biopsy Treatment approach Theophyllines (neutrophil apoptosis) Macrolides (reduced epithelial IL-8) 5-Lipoxygenase inhibitor (LTB4) or LTB4 receptor antagonist Smoking?? Phenotype Specific Asthma Treatment
BHR, no inflammation Symptomatic Marked PF variability and reversibility No inflammation on visit 2 biopsy Treatment approach Subcutaneous terbutaline infusion (Increase dose of LABs) Phenotype Specific Asthma Treatment
Fixed airflow obstruction Symptomatic Obstructive spirometry, no reversibility No inflammation on visit 2 biopsy Treatment approach Reduce treatment until evidence of reversibility appears Phenotype Specific Asthma Treatment
New Methods In Paediatric Respiratory Diseases • Ethical Issues in using Innovative Methods • Measuring Inflammation: General • Measuring Inflammation: Non-invasive • Measuring Inflammation: Invasive • Summary and Conclusions
Overall Conclusions • No one ideal “inflammometer” • May be helpful in looking at mechanisms – individual vs. group differences • May be useful to improve monitoring of asthma • May be useful in planning treatment