1 / 11

Quality and Diversity in Dutch Higher Education

Explore the necessity of a 'commission' for future development, diversification across three levels, and importance of lifelong learning. Discuss growth projections, student diversity, and steps to ensure education quality.

Download Presentation

Quality and Diversity in Dutch Higher Education

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Quality and Diversity in Dutch Higher Education KoenGeven Koen.geven@ei-ie.org

  2. Structure of Presentation • Introduction • Why a ‘commission’ to look at the future? • Diversification at three levels • Associate Degree • Lifelong Learning • Conclusions

  3. Growth in student numbers… Student numbers will increase to almost 700.000 in 2020: Increase in first year enrolments: Universities: + 40% Hogescholen: +20% Projections growth of student numbers (Commission report, p 63)

  4. …but is it enough? The growth in student numbers is more than welcome, as the 50 % participation target will not be reached. = NL Benchmark on reaching the 50 % target (Commission report, p 64)

  5. Take a step back… • Student backgrounds and preferences are increasingly diverse; • These students will need to be increasingly prepared for a European labor market in a knowledge economy; • Financial means for higher education have not been adequate for at least 20 years: there is a problem of quality.

  6. … and envisage a vision • The role of higher education leaders, students and professionals in realizing reforms should be strengthened; • Ownership of a ‘vision’ for higher education for the next decade is central for its success; • Vision should not ‘revolutionize’ but strengthen and incentivize positive developments.

  7. Rec 1: Diversification at three levels

  8. Rec 2: Associate Degree • Tension between two aims • Qualification in higher education; • Qualification that has direct relevance for the labour market. Two recommendations: • Only associate degrees that have an exit point in the labour market; • Allowing vocational schools and universities of applied science more autonomy in designing their governance.

  9. Rec 3: Lifelong Learning = NL The Netherlands has a relatively small amount of master graduates when compared to other countries. Relative number of bachelor and master graduates (Commission report, p 91)

  10. Rec 3: Lifelong Learning • Expand the offer of professional master programs, particularly at the universities of applied science. • ‘Demand-led’ lifelong learning: give the student lifelong learning rights to follow courses at an institution of choice;

  11. Conclusions • Students are changing, their backgrounds and preferences need a more responsive higher education system; • Success of a vision relies on how leadership, students and staff are involved and feel ownership over the agenda; • Moving lifelong learning forward will require public means but first steps should be taken by the higher education sector itself.

More Related