50 likes | 150 Views
Policy Framework WG Agenda 49 th IETF, San Diego. Co-chairs: Joel Halpern, joel@longsys.com Ed Ellesson, ellesson@tivoli.com. Monday (3:30 – 5:30pm). Intro/Objectives/Milestones: Joel , 10 min. Agenda Bash: Ed, 5 mi.
E N D
Policy Framework WG Agenda49th IETF, San Diego Co-chairs: Joel Halpern, joel@longsys.com Ed Ellesson, ellesson@tivoli.com
Monday (3:30 – 5:30pm) • Intro/Objectives/Milestones: Joel , 10 min. • Agenda Bash: Ed, 5 mi. • QDDIM: Bob Moore, Editor. Total: 30 min. (20 minutes issues presentation, plus 10 min. for discussion) • QPIM: QPIM Author(s) Total: 30 minutes (20 minutes issues presentation, plus 10 min. for discussion) • QDIM/QPIM compatibility w/ DiffServ: Tot.30 min (Conceptual Model, MIB, and PIB Issues discussion) • Wrap-up: Ed and Joel, 15 min. (Summary and short re-review of Wed agenda)
Wednesday (9:00 – 11:30am) • Intro/News since Monday: Ed and Joel, 5 min • IPSP's PCIM-based Model: Lee Rafalow/IPSP Participants: Total 30 min (20 min + 10 discuss) • Applying/Linking Policy: QDDIM, QPIM, IPSP: 30 minutes (Issues) • PCLS Update: Ryan Moats: 10 min. on issues, Ed Ellesson: 10 min on security considerations. Tot. 20 • Polterm harmonization: Andrea:20 minutes • QPIM/QDDIM Queues/Schedulers, 3 pictures: Walter, 15 min (Continued from Monday) • (If time permits) Use of policy in AAA Architecture: Cees deLaat, and John Vollbrecht: 10 minutes • (If time permits) MPLS: MPLS Policy Draft Author(s): Use of policy in MPLS: 10 min update • Wrap-up, and charter milestones re-visit: 10 minutes, Ed, Joel and Bert
Monday summary • QDDIM: • Differences with DiffServ resolved • 2nd discussion: 3 pictures on Wed. • Rsvp/intserv in common with diffserv: traffic handling and conditioning, adm control (added per Yoram Bernet’s note) • QPIM: • linkage with QDDIM: • Overlap: Need added text/terminology to describe how/why policy objects are different from device level view in QDDIM. • Configuration, policy and state distinctions. • Device independent, mechanism independent • Configuration vs. state • Config vs. op. behavior • PCIM extensions draft (Yes) • RSVP – with diffserv in same network. Positioning statement at least. • Mechanism vs. policy? Examples that show the level needed?
Wednesday summary • IPSP: • Take a look at sequenced action similarities with QPIM • Packet classification work effort proposed: Small design team • Express design goals • Consider to converge or not: single field generic (filter entry), variables/operators/values, sgl field specific (ipsp), multifield specific (6-tuple), do this in the separate, common document, with general purpose mechanisms, or understand why not, with guidelines for further application to other domains. • mapping the methods, one to the other, if multiples still exist • Terminology Draft: Rev in few weeks, then last call • Schedulers/Queues, author consensus: two weeks on list • Properties in an indep class (potential modification to this), hierarchical schedules with chaining, and adding success/fail associations • MPLS Policy: Authors discuss among and wg chairs, and their AD’s. Policy charter does not cover this. Technologly specific working groups need to address this, just like mibs/pibs • Co-chairs will work with Bert on Charter/WG Schedule