1 / 12

THE ASSOCIATED  PRODUCTION AND THE NUCLEAR INTERACTION OF  HYPERONS

J.Dąbrow s ki & J.Rożynek A.Sołtan Institute fot Nuclear Problems Kazimierz 2006. THE ASSOCIATED  PRODUCTION AND THE NUCLEAR INTERACTION OF  HYPERONS. Sources of information on V N : Associated production of Σ Strangeness exchange reactions  atoms

stesha
Download Presentation

THE ASSOCIATED  PRODUCTION AND THE NUCLEAR INTERACTION OF  HYPERONS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. J.Dąbrowski & J.Rożynek A.Sołtan Institute fot Nuclear Problems Kazimierz 2006 THE ASSOCIATED  PRODUCTION AND THE NUCLEAR INTERACTION OF  HYPERONS Sources of information on VN : Associated production of Σ Strangeness exchange reactions  atoms N scattering

  2. Associated production PK+ P,  K,  P p- θ

  3. VP0 = 46 MeVVPls= 15 MeVR = 3.8 fm adjusted to proton separation energy and to the energies of the p1/2, p3/2, and s1/2 tates determined in (p,2p) and (e,e’) reactioms W0  P<kPOPN> W0  2.5 MeV

  4. Kaon spectrum from (-,K=) on 28Si at K=6o at p=1.2 GeV/c. Data from P.K.Saha, et al., Phys.Rev.C 70, 044612(2004). A V 0 = -20 MeV BV 0 = 20 MeV C V 0 = 40 MeV D V 0= 90 MeV E V 0= 100 MeV [ MeV ]

  5. Strangeness exchange reaction P+ P, K ,  PK p- θ

  6. VΣ(r)=VΣ0 θ(R-r) VΣ0=20 MeV VΣ0=10 MeV VΣ0= - 10/20 MeV Π+ spectrum in the (K-,π+) Brookhaven experiments. R. Sawafta, Nucl. Phys. A585, 103c (1995); S.Bart et al., Phys.Rev.Lrtt. 83, 5238 (1999). JD and J.Rozynek, Acta Phys. Pol. 29B, 2147 (1998).

  7. Σ ATOMSCoulomb Coulomb + strong Γ Γ ε Γ

  8.  ATOMS  Σ Atoms JD, J.Rozynek, G.S.Agnostatos, Eur.Phys.Journ.A 14, 125 (2002). {-(h2/2)-VC(r)+V(r)+iW(r)}= (E-iΓ/2) LDA V((r))+iW ((r))  –<kN> {-(h2/2) -VC(r) }0 = E00 energy shift  = Eo - E width 

  9. The Nijmegen N Interaction VN VN(models D, F, SC, NSC ) LOB Yamamoto et al. Progr.Theor.Phys. Suppl. 117, 241 (1994) VN() (effective interaction) JD Phys.ReV.C 60, 025205 (1992) V()

  10. V0for Nijmegen models D,F,SC,NSC JD Nucl.Phys. A691,58c (2001).

  11. Summary • Our simple analysis of the associated production data suggests that the  s.p. potential U inside the nuclear core is stronglyrepulsive ( ~ 100 MeV).* • On the other hand a similar analysis of the strangeness exchange data and our analysis of the  atomic data suggests that at nuclear matter densities appearing inside nuclei. U is lessrepulsive ( ~ 20 MeV). • Astrophysical consequences: • stiffer EOS  greater masses of neutron stars

More Related