130 likes | 305 Views
Quantum thermodynamics: Thermodynamics at the nanoscale. Armen E. Allahverdyan (Amsterdam/Yerevan) Roger Balian (CEA-Saclay; Academie des Sciences) Theo M. Nieuwenhuizen (University of Amsterdam). Outline. First law: what is work, what is heat, system energy.
E N D
Quantum thermodynamics:Thermodynamics at the nanoscale Armen E. Allahverdyan (Amsterdam/Yerevan)Roger Balian (CEA-Saclay; Academie des Sciences)Theo M. Nieuwenhuizen (University of Amsterdam)
Outline First law: what is work, what is heat, system energy. Second law: confirmation versus violations. Maximal extractable work from a quantum system. Are adiabatic changes always optimal? Efficiency of quantum engines Towards a quantum fluctuation theorem?
First law: is there a thermodynamic description? where H is that part of the total Hamiltonian, that governs the unitary part of (Langevin) dynamics Work: Energy-without-entropy added to the system macroscopic source induces classical functions of time. 1) Just energy increase of work source2) Gibbs-Planck: energy of macroscopic degree of freedom The rest: energy-without-work from the bath Energy related to uncontrollable degrees of freedom
Caldeira-Leggett model Langevin equation if initially no correlation between S and B
Second law for finite quantum systems No thermodynamic limit Thermodynamics endangered Different formulations are inequivalent Generalized Thomson formulation is valid: Cyclic changes on system in Gibbs equilibrium cannot yield work (Pusz+Woronowicz ’78, Lenard’78, A+N ’02.) • Clausius inequality may be violated • due to formation of cloud of bath modes A+N, PRL 85, 1799 (’00) ; PRE 66, 036102 (’02), PRB 02, J. Phys A,02 experiments proposed for mesoscopic circuits and quantum optics. - Rate of energy dispersion may be negative Classically: = T*( rate of entropy production ): non-negative
Work extraction from finite Q-systems Couple to work source and do all possible work extractions Thermodynamics: minimize final energy at fixed entropyAssume final state is gibbsian: fix final T from S = const.Extracted work=(free) energy difference U(0)-TS(0)+T log Z(T) But: Quantum mechanics is unitary, So all n eigenvalues conserved: n-1 constraints: (Gibbs state typically unattainable for n>2) Optimal: eigenvectors of become those of H, if ordering Maximally extractable work: ergotropy
-non-gibbsian states can be passive -Comparison of activities: Aspects of ergotropy Thermodynamic upper bounds: more work possible from But actual work may be largest from -Coupling to an auxiliary system : if is less active than Then can be more active than -Thermodynamic regime reduced to states that majorize one another - Optimal unitary transformations unitary matrices U(t) do yield, in examples, explicit Hamiltonians for achieving optimal work extraction
Are adiabatic processes always optimal? One of the formulations of the second law: Adiabatic thermally isolated processes done on an equilibrium system are optimal (cost least work or yield most work) In finite Q-systems: Work larger or equal to free energy difference But adiabatic work is not free energy difference. A+N, 2003: -No level crossing : adiabatic theorem holds -Level crossing: solve using adiabatic perturbation theory. Diabatic processes are less costly than adiabatic.Work = new tool to test level crossing. Level crossing possible if two or more parameters are changed. Review expts on level crossing: Yarkony, Rev Mod Phys 1996
Q-engines ABN’04: System S coupled to two baths, with T1 < T2 Baths Gibbsian but correlatedCorrelation entropy Theorem: - No correlations: Carnot efficiency is optimum- Correlations can give more work: Scully group: phaseonium
Photo-Carnot engine Scully group, Texas A&M (Science, 2002) The cavity has one movable mirror, temperature T_c Volume is set by photon pressure on piston Coherent atom beam ‘phaseonium’ interacts with photons: bath T_h Efficiency exceeds Carnot value, due to correlations of atoms
Fluctuation relation Classical work in trajectory W = H(x(t),p(t),t)-H(x(0),p(0),0) -Trajectories with W<0 yield work; observed in small systems What about Quantum regime? Is QM compatible with such a relation? How should work be defined for small Q-systems? At t=0 preparation by measuring H: selection of subensembles. Can work
Frontiers of Quantum and Mesoscopic Thermodynamics 26-29 July 2004, Prague, Czech RepublicSatellite Conference of the Condensed Matter Division, EPS, 19 - 23 July Prague Tentative list of topics • Quantum, mesoscopic and (partly) classical thermodynamics • Quantum limits to the second law. • Quantum measurement • Quantum decoherence and dephasing • Mesoscopic and nanomechanical systems • Classical molecular motors, ratchet systems and rectified motion • Quantum Brownian motion • Quantum motors • Relevant experiments from the nano- to the macro-scale
Summary Q-thermodynamics: small system, large work source+bath Different formulations of the second law have different ranges of validity Experimental tests feasible e.g. in quantum optics • New results for thermodynamics of small Q-systems: • -violation of Clausius inequality • -optimal extractable work: ergotropy • -adiabatic changes non-optimal if level crossing • correlations enhance efficiency in Q- engines • - Q-fluctuation relation