190 likes | 274 Views
The Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest Doctoral School of Banking and Finance. CURRENT ACCOUNT DEFICIT DETERMINANTS: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS ON ROMANIA MSc. Student: Hândoreanu Cătălina Supervisor: Prof. Moisă Altăr Bucharest, June 2002. Introduction Literature review
E N D
The Academy of Economic Studies BucharestDoctoral School of Banking and Finance CURRENT ACCOUNT DEFICIT DETERMINANTS: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS ON ROMANIA MSc. Student: Hândoreanu Cătălina Supervisor: Prof. Moisă Altăr Bucharest, June 2002
Introduction • Literature review • A brief characterization of Romanian current account • Econometric estimations • Concluding remarks
Introduction • Important measure of macroeconomics performance • Current account deficit: - country’s development possibilities - saving-investment imbalance • Mexican (1994) and Asian (1997) crises
Literature Review • Different theoretical models that show determinants of current account dynamics and relation between factors and current account • Intertemporal approach • Empirical evidence
Literature Review-Intertemporal Approach • Current account deficit: outcome of forward-looking dynamic saving and investment decision by expectation of productivity growth, government spending and interest rates • Obstfeld and Rogoff (1994, 1995) • Cashin and McDermott (1996) • Ostry (1997) • Callen and Cashin (1999) • Kim, Hall and Buckle (2001)
Literature Review- Empirical evidence • Panel data • Different factors • Chinn and Lee (1998) • Calderon, Chong and Loayza (1999) • Roubini Wachtel (1999) • Chin and Prasad (2000) • Calderon, Chong and Zanforlin (2001) • Lane and Milesi-Ferretti (2002)
A brief characterization of Romanian current account • Until 1989 - current account surplus • Since 1990 - current account deficit • Current account deficit of 8.5% of GDP in 1990 • Another peak of 7.2% of GDP in 1998 • Sudden reduction of current account deficit in 1999 and 2000 Fig.1
Econometric estimations (1) • I used Perron unit roots test • Current account deficit do not have structural break Perron Results Fig.2
Econometric estimations (2) • Equation that will be estimated: CAD = 1COV +2BUG +3 EXR • Estimation method: Two Stages Least Squares
Econometric estimations (3) • First step: the selection of instrumental variables • Candidates for the role of instrumental variables: -three periods lagged values of endogenous variables -present and three periods lagged values of exogenous variables • The selection of the instrumental variables is based on the statistical significance of the candidate variables in the regression of the endogenous variables on all the candidate variables • Instrumental variables resulted: [CAD(-1), BUG, BUG(-3), EXR(-2), DDEBT(-2), DNFA(-1), DIFI(-2) DUMMY]
Econometric estimations (5) • Final equation: CAD = 0.396120*COV + 0.176707*BUG – 0.086338*EXR (3.149963) (1.720209) (-3.769576) ELASTICITY ELASTICITY
Concluding remarks • There is: - a positive correlation between “twin deficits” - a positive correlation between current account deficit and coverage imports through exports - a negative correlation between current account deficit and exchange rate • Positive correlation between exchange rate and both exports and imports • Annual data are necessary
Positive correlation between exchange rate and imports and exports