780 likes | 920 Views
Economical Realism. Avril Styrman. Economically Empiricist Realism in Axiomatic Ontology. Economical Realism. The Role of Economy in Ontology?. Economy. P rune out the unnecessary part of metaphysics from science. Economy. Prune out the unnecessary part of metaphysics from science
E N D
Economical Realism Avril Styrman
Economy • Prune out the unnecessary part of metaphysics from science
Economy • Prune out the unnecessary part of metaphysics from science • Sustain the necessary part of metaphysics: only those interpretations are required which exist in any case, even if their existence is denied
Economy • Prune out the unnecessary part of metaphysics from science • Sustain the necessary part of metaphysics: only those interpretations are required which exist in any case, even if their existence is denied • Pruning out the unnecessary metaphysics and identifying the necessary metaphysics has the possibility to accelerate the progress of science
Economy • What happens if an interpretation exists but its existence is denied?
Economy • What happens if an interpretation exists but its existence is denied? • The result is uncriticized metaphysics that runs loose
Economy • “Find a scientific man who proposes to get along without any metaphysics... and you have found one whose doctrines are thoroughly vitiated by the crude and uncriticizedmetaphysics with which they are packed… Every man of us has a metaphysics, and has to have one; and it will influence his life greatly. Far better, then, that that metaphysics should be criticized and not be allowed to run loose.” Charles Sanders Peirce, Collected Works of Charles Sanders Peirce 1.129
Economy • Theories/interpretations A and B explain exactly the same thing
Economy • Theories/interpretations A and B explain exactly the same thing • What is the measure of fitness between A and B?
Economy • Theories/interpretations A and B explain exactly the same thing • What is the measure of fitness between A and B? • The simplest interpretation is the best
Economy • Theories/interpretations A and B explain exactly the same thing • What is the measure of fitness between A and B? • The simplest interpretation is the best • Economy might be the only available objective judge, but only when A and B explain exactly the same thing
Economy • The importance of economy should not be underestimated, because there exists a jungle of interpretations in science, that effectively muddifies science
Realism • Economy/simplicity can be achieved by identifying the anti-realist interpretations in science, and pruning them out as uneconomical alternatives compared to the realist interpretations
Realism • Economy/simplicity can be achieved by identifying the anti-realist interpretations in science, and pruning them out as uneconomical alternatives compared to the realist interpretations • Two main alternatives are the two competing groups of interrelated interpretations: realism and solipsism
Realism • Example 1: economy judging between the generic forms of ontological realism and solipsism
Realism • Example 1: economy judging between the generic forms of ontological realism and solipsism • Example 2: economy judging between a realist interpretation and a solipsist intepretation in physics
Realism or Solipsism? The solipsist must in any case postulate a dichotomy that is operationally identical to ontological realism
Realism or Solipsism? Economy favours realism because solipsism is bothered with an unnecessary appendix: the universal mind
Realism or Solipsism? • Is ecomomy a big deal? Why fuzz over it?
Realism or Solipsism? • Is ecomomy a big deal? Why fuzz over it? • Because the lack of economy is disastrous
Realism or Solipsism? • Is ecomomy a big deal? Why fuzz over it? • Because the lack of economy is disastrous • “Accept one difficulty and the rest follows —a simple enough proceeding” Aristotle, Physics, bk.1, ch.2, 185a11-12
Realism or Solipsism? • Is ecomomy a big deal? Why fuzz over it? • Because the lack of economy is disastrous • “Accept one difficulty and the rest follows —a simple enough proceeding” Aristotle, Physics, bk.1, ch.2, 185a11-12 • “…far happier they than such as wallow helplessly in a rich mud of conceptions” Charles Sanders Peirce, How to Make Our Ideas Clear, 1878
Realism vs. Solipsism in Physics • An example where the measurement results can be given a realist and a solipsist interpretation
Locality and Nonlocality • What is the velocity of causal influences between spatially separated particulars?
Locality and Nonlocality • What is the velocity of causal influences between spatially separated particulars? Earth - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Alpha Centauri
Locality and Nonlocality • What is the velocity of causal influences between spatially separated particulars? Earth - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Alpha Centauri The speed of light: local Universe
Locality and Nonlocality • What is the velocity of causal influences between spatially separated particulars? Earth - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Alpha Centauri The speed of light: local Universe Faster than light: nonlocal Universe
Locality and Nonlocality • What is the velocity of causal influences between spatially separated particulars? Earth - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Alpha Centauri The speed of light: local Universe Faster than light: nonlocal Universe Instantaneous: nonlocal Universe
Nonlocality Tests • J.A.W. van Houwelingen N. Gisin D. Salart, A. Baas and H. Zbinden. Spacelike separation in a Bell test assuming gravitationally induced collapses. Physical Review Letters, 100, 2008. • P. Grangier A. Aspect and G. Roger. Experimental tests of local realistic theories via Bell’s theorem. Physical Review Letters, 47: 460–463, 1981. • P. Grangier A. Aspect and G. Roger. Experimental realisation of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohmgedankenexperiment: a new violation of Bell’s inequalities. Physical Review Letters, 49: 91–94, 1982.
Nonlocality Tests • Particles a and b are in a singlet state in the source.
Nonlocality Tests • Particles a and b are in a singlet state in the source. • The source is manipulated and the particles start moving towards opposite directions
Nonlocality Tests • Particles a and b both can be measured to have some spin values: spin-up xor spin-down
Nonlocality Tests • The spins of a and b are correlated: when the spin of a is measured to be spin-up, the spin of b is measured to spin-down, and vice versa: a-up & b-down a-down & b-up
Nonlocality Tests • The spins of a and b are correlated: when the spin of a is measured to be spin-up, the spin of b is measured to spin-down, and vice versa: a-up & b-down a-up b-down a-down & b-up b-up -down
Nonlocality Tests • The spins of a and b are correlated: when the spin of a is measured to be spin-up, the spin of b is measured to spin-down, and vice versa: a-up & b-down no b-up & a-up a-down & b-up no a-down & b-down
Nonlocality Tests • How should the correlation be interpreted?
Nonlocality Tests • How should the correlation be interpreted? • The realist and the solipsist interpretations
The Realist Interpretation • The spins of a and b are correlated and there is nothing more into it
The Realist Interpretation • The spins of a and b are correlated and there is nothing more into it • They are measured to be correlated because they have been correlated all along, in the singlet state and after