1 / 29

Victoria Simon, Ph.D., MFT

How Intergenerational Poverty, Trauma and Criminal Thinking Impact Engagement and Retention in the Criminal Justice Population. Victoria Simon, Ph.D., MFT. An overview…. Engagement and the impact of INTERGENERATIONAL POVERTY Engagement and the impact of TRAUMA Criminal Thinking

storm
Download Presentation

Victoria Simon, Ph.D., MFT

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. How Intergenerational Poverty, Trauma and Criminal Thinking Impact Engagement and Retention in the Criminal Justice Population Victoria Simon, Ph.D., MFT

  2. An overview… • Engagement and the impact of INTERGENERATIONAL POVERTY • Engagement and the impact of TRAUMA • Criminal Thinking • Self-Sabotage: why we see it and how to help • Rewards and Sanctions • The impact of ENVIRONMENT and COMMUNITY • Customer Service

  3. The Impact ofINTERGENERATIONAL POVERTY Following from (Payne, et al., 2009) - Characteristics of Intergenerational Poverty • Defined as two or more generations in poverty • The mother is usually the center of the family - Impacts of Intergenerational Poverty • Negatively impacted by poverty and its effects: • Language • Memory ability • Working memory • Executive functions • Allostatic load (“wear and tear” on the body from the neuroendocrine, nervous, cardiovascular, metabolic and immune systems): the greater the allostatic load, the less the working memory functions

  4. INTERGENERATIONAL POVERTY, continued • Impact on learning: • Decreased Executive Functioning impacts: • behavior self regulation • adult intelligence • problem solving • Working memory is part of the Executive Functioning and includes the ability to do the following: • Giving/receiving multiple directions at once • Planning • Task Completion • Behavioral self regulation • Ability to identify options

  5. INTERGENERATIONAL POVERTY, continued - Impacts of Intergenerational Poverty on treatment • The majority of EBP and PP curriculums – even those designed for the offender population – don’t take into account the impacts of generational poverty on learning • Curriculums are primarily reading/writing intensive • Demand independent problem solving • Depend on memory without repetition or role play • Require planning and task completion • Often use language that is set in a more formal register (rather than the casual register that clients use)

  6. INTERGENERATIONAL POVERTY, continued What has NOT been impacted by Intergenerational Poverty? Visual and spatial abilities - suggesting that visual teaching and learning techniques are the most effective • Training for treatment staff needed about how to modify information within a sensory learning format • Sight, sound, smell, taste, visual, tactile experience • Repetition and role play is vital

  7. The Impact ofTRAUMA Trauma data from Lynne Marsenich, LCSW • What is Trauma? • A Traumatic event is one in which a person experiences, witnesses or is confronted with actual or threatened death or serious injury, or threat to the physical integrity of oneself or others • Responses to trauma often include intense fear, helplessness or horror

  8. Trauma, continued • Prevalence • Individuals with trauma histories from childhood onward make up the majority of clients with mental health and substance abuse issues • 90% of all clients receiving MH support have been exposed to or experienced trauma (Mueser et al., 1998) • 75% of all clients receiving SA treatment report trauma histories (SAMSHA/CSAT, 2000) • Males are most likely to report witnessing violence, while females report being victims of violence (Hennessey et al., 2004)

  9. Trauma, continued • Trauma experiences • When abused in childhood, individuals commonly experience trauma and re-victimization through domestic violence, sexual assaults, gang and drug related violence, homelessness and poverty • Females sexually abused during childhood are 2.4 times more likely than non abused females to be sexually assaulted as adults (NASMHDP/NTAC, p. 55) • Adults with trauma histories are frequently traumatized further in incarcerated settings and in the community by supervising and social service agencies • Unsafe environments • Coercive interventions

  10. Trauma, continued • Trauma and the Criminal Justice population • The majority of men and women in the criminal justice system report having been abused as children • Trauma experiences are interpersonal in nature, intentional, prolonged and repeated; they may extend over years of life • They include sexual abuse and/or incest, physical abuse, severe neglect, psychological abuse • They include witness and threats of violence (personal and community), repeated abandonment and sudden and traumatic losses

  11. Trauma, continued • Trauma Informed Interventions • Incorporate knowledge about trauma – prevalence, impact and recovery – in all aspects of service delivery (trauma treatment vs. trauma informed care) • Create environments that are hospitable and engaging for survivors • Minimize re-victimization • Facilitate recovery and empowerment • Symptoms are not understood as pathology but primarily as attempts to cope and survive • Survivors are survivors – their strengths need to be recognized

  12. Trauma, continued • Trauma Informed Interventions, continued • A collaborative relationship between the consumer and the provider • Both the consumer and provider are assumed to have valid and valuable knowledge bases • The consumer’s safety must be guaranteed and trust must be developed over time

  13. Criminal Thinking • What is Criminal Thinking? Hazelden Foundation, 2002 • Victim Stance (blaming others) • Good Person Stance (narcissism, better than others) • Unique Person Stance (no one else like you or experienced what you have) • Fear of Exposure • Lack of Time Perspective (don’t learn from the past or plan for the future) • Selective Effort • Use of Power to Control • Seek Excitement First

  14. Criminal Thinking, continued • Victim Stance (blaming others) • Given what we know about intergenerational poverty and/or trauma, are their other ways to look at this type of thinking other than a “criminal” lens?

  15. Criminal Thinking, continued • Good Person Stance (narcissism, better than others) • Given what we know about intergenerational poverty and/or trauma, are their other ways to look at this type of thinking other than a “criminal” lens?

  16. Criminal Thinking, continued • Unique Person Stance (no one else like you or experienced what you have) • Given what we know about intergenerational poverty and/or trauma, are their other ways to look at this type of thinking other than a “criminal” lens?

  17. Criminal Thinking, continued • Fear of Exposure • Given what we know about intergenerational poverty and/or trauma, are their other ways to look at this type of thinking other than a “criminal” lens?

  18. Criminal Thinking, continued • Lack of Time Perspective (don’t learn from the past or plan for the future) • Given what we know about intergenerational poverty and/or trauma, are their other ways to look at this type of thinking other than a “criminal” lens?

  19. Criminal Thinking, continued • Selective Effort • Given what we know about intergenerational poverty and/or trauma, are their other ways to look at this type of thinking other than a “criminal” lens?

  20. Criminal Thinking, continued • Use of Power to Control • Given what we know about intergenerational poverty and/or trauma, are their other ways to look at this type of thinking other than a “criminal” lens?

  21. SELF-SABOTAGE • Why do we see self-sabotage? • Success tests limits and creates vulnerability • Fear of embarrassment/shame if there is real or perceived failure • Ambivalence about new image • Practical concerns

  22. Self-sabotage, continued • How to address self-sabotage • Basic CBT approaches • Increase awareness of fears/concerns • Look at Pros/Cons • Teach thought stopping and replacement tools • Take small steps • Seek peer support • Ensure that there are support systems in place for practical needs • Allow for both forward and backward movement

  23. Questions to ask when looking to increase engagement • Do clients feel comfortable in their treatment environment? • Is the treatment environment welcoming? • Does the client feel safe? Do the female clients feel safe? • Does the treatment environment understand and address literacy? • Are groups offered in a sensory learning format? • Is individual literacy support provided to clients who have reading/writing/comprehension issues?

  24. Questions for increase engagement, continued • Is the treatment provider aware of client’s trauma history? • Is there not only trauma treatment, but trauma informed care? • Are there coercive treatment interventions being used? How are “mandatory” services handled? • Does the treatment provider understand the impact of trauma and intergenerational poverty on criminal thinking?

  25. Questions for increase engagement, continued • How is Malingering handled? • Has the client learned pro-social behaviors yet? • When the client says that something is wrong, do people listen? • If the client says that something is “a little wrong,” do people listen? • Does the client feel shut down when they make a request?

  26. Rewards and Sanctions • Rewards and Sanctions • There is no disputing the outcomes – programs who offer both rewards and sanctions are significantlymore effective • Rewards (earned through positive behaviors, compliance, helping others, etc.): gift cards, decreased housing restrictions, decreased curfew, increase responsibility/recognition, praise • Sanctions (ideally delivered by supervising agency): letter, increased housing restrictions, increased curfew, increased supervision, community service, incarceration • The key is that when limits are set, this is done in a supportivenot a punitivemanner. Staff (at all times) must be partners with their clients

  27. The Impact of ENVIRONMENT and COMMUNITY How is a discussion about the environment and community of a treatment agency relevant to a training on the treatment of offenders?

  28. ENVIRONMENT and COMMUNITY, continued • What makes people stay connected? Retention is driven by emotional factors! • The Power of Habit by Charles Duhigg sites a study done in 2000 for YMCA to determine why certain clubs had significantly higher retention than others. The conclusion? “Retention, the data said, was driven by emotional factors, such as whether employees knew members’ names or said hello when they walked in.” (p. 211) • This is most likely the same reason that community based organizations are the ONLY treatment providers to invert the retention numbers (70% retention vs. the 30% that is typically seen) • Underlines the importance of feeling “connected” to an agency

  29. A Welcoming Environment • This is as simple as good customer service • Why do social service agencies think they work in an industry where the idea of “customer service” doesn’t apply? • Basic customer service skills that don’t seem to be expected in the social service world: • Either answer your phone or return your calls • Don’t make promises unless you can keep them • Listen to your customers • Deal with complaints • Be helpful – even if there is no immediate profit in it • Train your staff to be helpful, courteous and knowledgeable • Take the extra step • Think outside the box

More Related