1 / 10

Kinetic SZ effect from galaxy cluster rotation & Another relativistic correction to the SZE

Kinetic SZ effect from galaxy cluster rotation & Another relativistic correction to the SZE. Jens Chluba and Karl Mannheim A&A 396, 419-428 (2002) Universitäts-Sternwarte Göttingen. JC, Gert Hütsi and Rashid Sunyaev accepted by A&A, 2005, astro-ph/0409058 Max-Planck-Institut für Astrophysik.

stormy
Download Presentation

Kinetic SZ effect from galaxy cluster rotation & Another relativistic correction to the SZE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Kinetic SZ effect from galaxy cluster rotation&Another relativistic correction to the SZE Jens Chluba and Karl Mannheim A&A 396, 419-428 (2002) Universitäts-Sternwarte Göttingen JC, Gert Hütsi and Rashid Sunyaev accepted by A&A, 2005, astro-ph/0409058 Max-Planck-Institut für Astrophysik

  2. Kinetic SZ effect from galaxy cluster rotation

  3. Mergers in the cosmological context should excite large & small scale motion of the ICM ! (off-axis mergers) Coma Cluster (XMM) (Schuecker et al., 2004)  turbulent motions on scales ~20-145 kpc (core radius 420 kpc)  turbulence on larger scales is possible! Turbulent cascades from large  small scales viscosity plasma instabilities magnetic fields transition between k-SZ & th-SZ SZ effect and Alma workshop - Orsay - April 2005 - Jens Chluba - MPA-Garching Large & smalle scale motion of the ICM Schuecker et al., 2004

  4. Hydrodynamic simulations by Norman & Bryan 1999  turbulent velocities ~ 25-60% of virial velocity  minor mergers maintain the level of turbulence  also found „ordered“ circulation, which is likely due to a off-axis merger X-ray spectral lines for Centaurus cluster (Dupke & Bregman 2001)  bulk velocities of the order of ~1000 km/s  likely due to a previous off-axis merger Several recent hydrodynamic simulations (Nagai et al. 2003; Torman, Moscardini & Yoshida 2004; Diaferio, Borgani, Moscardini et al. 2005)  bulk velocities v ~ few  100 km/s SZ effect and Alma workshop - Orsay - April 2005 - Jens Chluba - MPA-Garching Large & smalle scale motion of the ICM (2)

  5. Initial stage after (major) merger  one large scale eddie  simple assumption: solid body rotation  line of sight velocity constant Gas follows isothermal b-model  line of sight integral analytical spectral dependence like k-SZ dipolar signature (inclination) extrema at y ~ few  rc bcore ~ 10-5 to few  10-4 DT ~ 0.1 - few  10 µK SZ effect and Alma workshop - Orsay - April 2005 - Jens Chluba - MPA-Garching Toy-model for large scale motion of the ICM b=0.75, i=90°, Rmax= 10 rc

  6. Main signals th-SZ and k-SZ RJ part of the CMB spectrum  th-SZ dominant close to cross-over frequency  k-SZ + rk-SZ shift of the maximum: Dy ~ fraction of the core radius  optimistic: Dy ~ few arcsec  even more optimistic: Dy up to arcmin (no k-SZ) Comparison of SZ image at different frequencies This probably also happens for two merging lumps linear polarization  many orders smaller (few nK or a fraction of µK level)  sensitive to the transverse velocity  optimistic: on the level of a few % relative to the k-SZ polarization  k-SZ + rk-SZ  tilt of the planes of polarization by a few degree  frequency-independent (in principle separable from e.g. multiple scattering for rich clusters...) SZ effect and Alma workshop - Orsay - April 2005 - Jens Chluba - MPA-Garching Multi-frequency observations of the SZE

  7. Another relativistic correction to the SZE....

  8. Relativistic temperatures & peculiar motions (Rephaeli, 1995; Challinor & Lasenby 1998; Sazonov & Sunyaev, 1998; Itoh et al., 1998)  corrections to the lowest order signals  especially important at high frequencies  10-20% deviations  possiblility to measure the electron temperature only with the CMB (strong frequency dependence) non-thermal SZ Motion of the Solar System ! (Chluba, Hütsi & Sunyaev, 2004) has been neglected so far SZ effect: imprint in the CMB rest frame Doppler boosting & aberration Lorentz boosted y-distortion  correction similar to the first order temperature correction to the k-SZ easy to take into account! SZ effect and Alma workshop - Orsay - April 2005 - Jens Chluba - MPA-Garching SZ effect from clusters of galaxies

  9. Example kTe= 5.1 keV, bc = 10-3 and bo = 1.241 10-3 strong frequency and spatial dependence can reach the level of 10% of the k-SZ at high frequencies (e.g.14% at 400 GHz) RJ- limits: motion-induced correction to th-SZ: DT/T=-2 ybo m SZ effect and Alma workshop - Orsay - April 2005 - Jens Chluba - MPA-Garching Motion-induced Change of SZ Brightness

  10. simple analytic model for k-SZ from cluster rotation dipolar signature on few  10 arcsec angular scales close to center DT ~ 0.1 - few  10 µK comparing multi-fequency morphology may be useful combined with polarization very useful to constraint motions of ICM turbulent motions  interesting contribution to th-SZ (transition) motion-induced correction to the th-SZ similar to the first order temperature correction to the k-SZ strong spectral & spacial dependence reaches the 10% level of the k-SZ easy to take into account !!! Dipolar asymmetry of the cluster number counts (1% level) Conclusions

More Related