780 likes | 787 Views
Explore the roots and structure of the federal judiciary, including the Supreme Court and other courts. Learn about the court's real power, judicial review, and the selection of federal judges. Understand the courts as policymakers and the checks on their power.
E N D
CHAPTER 16 THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM
Roots of the Federal Judiciary • Constitution creates high Court • Congress establishes others • Judges have life tenure with good behavior • Constitution is silent on judicial review
CH 18 SUM THE COURT SYSTEM DUAL COURT SYSTEM FEDERAL AND STATES SUPREME COURT LINKS BOTH SUPREME COURT RULES OVER BOTH
CH 18 SUM THE COURT SYSTEM THE COURT’S “REAL” POWER JUDICIAL REVIEW MARBURY V MADISON (1803)
CH 18 SUM THE COURT SYSTEM INFERIOR CONSTITUTIONAL COURTS • DISTRICT COURTS • COURT OF APPEALS • COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
CH 18 SUM THE COURT SYSTEM SPECIAL (LEGISLATIVE) COURTS • U.S. CLAIMS • TERRITORIAL • DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA • MILITARY APPEALS • TAX COURT
CH 18 SUM THE COURT SYSTEM THE U.S. SUPREME COURT 9 MEMBERS (NOT SET BY CONSTITUTION) TERM OF OFFICE = LIFE RELEASE OPINIONS MAJORITY CONCURRING DISSENTING
THEMIS BLIND JUSTICE SCALES & SWORD
Chief Justice • John Roberts • Associate Justices • Anthony Scalia • Anthony Kennedy • Clarence Thomas • Ruth Bader Ginsberg • Stephen Breyer • Samuel Alito • Sonia Sotomayor • Elena Kagan
2012 Supreme Court Official Photo Official Photo Goes Here
Edwards, Wattenberg, and Lineberry Government in America: People, Politics, and Policy Fourteenth Edition The Federal Courts Chapter 16
The Nature of the Judicial System Two types of cases: Criminal Law: Government charges an individual Civil Law: Dispute between two individuals Most cases tried/resolved in state courts
Participants in the Judicial System Litigants Plaintiff—the party bringing the charge Defendant—the party being charged Jury—people deciding the case
Supreme Court salaries (2014) Justices $213,900, Chief Justice $223,500
The Structure of the Federal Judicial System District Courts (91 federal courts) Original Jurisdiction (Trial Court) Case Jurisdiction Federal crimes Civil suits under federal law and across state lines Supervise bankruptcy and naturalization Review some federal agencies Admiralty and maritime law cases Supervision of naturalization of aliens
12 Courts of Appeal Appellate Jurisdiction Reviews legal issues in cases from lower courts Hold no trials and hear no testimony U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit – specialized cases Both focus on errors of procedure and law
The Supreme Court Ensures uniformity in interpreting national laws Resolves conflicts among states Maintains national supremacy in law Some original jurisdiction, but mostly appellate jurisdiction
SELECTING FEDERAL JUDGES • Presidents nominates, Senate Confirms. • Use of senatorial courtesy. • Competence, use of ABA ratings. • Ideology or policy preferences. • Needs political support. • Religion, race, ethnicity, and gender.
START HERE
The Courts as Policymakers Accepting Cases Use the “rule of four” to choose cases Issues a writ of certiorari to call up the case Supreme Court accepts few cases each year
Making Decisions Oral arguments heard by the justices Justices discuss the case One justice will write the majority opinion Majority Opinion ‘Winning’ side and legal arguments. Dissenting opinions Written by justices who oppose the majority. Concurring opinions Support of the majority- stress a different legal basis.
The Courts as Policymakers Judicial implementation Courts ‘weakest link” Must rely on others to carry out decisions
CHECKS ON THE POWER OF THE COURT • LACK OF ENFORCEMENT (NO JUDICIAL POLICE) (PRESIDENT ANDREW JACKSON) • SENATE MUST OK JUDGES • CONGRESS CAN IMPEACH JUDGES • CONGRESS CAN CHANGE # OF JUDGES • LAWS CAN BE REWRITTEN • THE CONSTITUTION CAN BE AMENDED
JOHNMARSHALL4THCHIEFJUSTICE OF THEU.S.SUPREMECOURT(1801-1835)
JOHN ROBERTS CHIEFJUSTICE2005 - ???? (CONSERVATIVE) (GEORGE W BUSH)
Understanding the Courts The Courts and Democracy Courts are not very democratic. Not elected The courts don’t always reflect popular majorities. Conflicting rulings lead to deadlock and inconsistency.