1 / 16

STIP and Local PID Workload Framework

STIP and Local PID Workload Framework. April 12, 2012 California Department of Transportation PID Committee Meeting. Presentation Overview. Problem Statement Framework Objectives Summary of Proposed Framework Walk Through the Proposed Framework Questions. Problem Statement.

sue
Download Presentation

STIP and Local PID Workload Framework

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. STIP and Local PID Workload Framework April 12, 2012 California Department of Transportation PID Committee Meeting

  2. Presentation Overview • Problem Statement • Framework Objectives • Summary of Proposed Framework • Walk Through the Proposed Framework • Questions California Department of Transportation

  3. Problem Statement In order to zero-base its Project Initiation Document (PID) workload and align the development of PIDs with available funding capacity for new transportation projects on the State Highway System, Caltrans must clearly explain how projects transition from 20-year financially-constrained Regional Transportation Plans (RTP) into the Caltrans’ PID workload. California Department of Transportation

  4. Framework Objectives • Tell the story to Department of Finance (DOF), Legislative Analyst Office (LAO), and the Legislature how projects transition from the 20-Year Regional Transportation Plans (RTP) to the PID workload. • Tie priority candidate and shelf projects in the PID workload to “anticipated” funding. • Establish a formalized process where the Caltrans and local and regional agencies can work together to develop PID needs. California Department of Transportation

  5. Summary of Proposed Framework California Department of Transportation

  6. Develop and Update Caltrans, Local, and Regional Plans (Steps 1 and 2) • Caltrans develop and update system planning products for long-range transportation needs. • Local agencies develop and update plans at the local level which includes general plans, transit plans, bicycle and pedestrian plans, and other plans. • Regional agencies develop and update RTPs which include financially-constrained lists of proposed projects. California Department of Transportation

  7. Assess Four-Year Funding Capacityfor New Projects (Step 3) • Using the financial assumptions in the RTP as a basis, local agencies would need to assess “anticipated” funds covering 4 years (e.g. STIP, other state fund sources, local measure, etc.). • Four years of “anticipated” funds would represent funding capacity to program new projects (with a PID) into Project Approval and Environmental Document (PAED) phase within 4 years. California Department of Transportation

  8. Basis for Four-Years of Funding • The State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) is a 5-Year Program. • Through the adopted Fund Estimates, • Years 1 through 3 are typically consumed with existing projects in the STIP; and • New funding is added last 2 years, a total of 1.466 billion. • 2012 STIP Commission Staff Recommendation advises Caltrans to use this approach. California Department of Transportation

  9. More About the STIP • Due to the State budget process, PID workload and budget development would cover two (2) STIP cycles. • PID development for FYs 2011-12 and 2012-13 would cover the 2014 STIP. STIP PIDs should be completed prior to 12/2013 in time for the RTIP adoptions. • PID development for FYs 2013-14 and 2014-15 would cover the 2016 STIP. The PIDs should be completed prior to 12/2015. • Hence, four-years of funding comes from two STIP cycles (two years for each STIP cycle). California Department of Transportation

  10. 20-Years vs. 4-Years Regional Transportation Plan (20-Years) Funding Highest Priority Projects (4-Years) California Department of Transportation

  11. Assess RTPs for Highest Priority Projects (Step 4) • Based on the RTP, develop a list of priority candidate projects that can reasonably be programmed (or funded) over the next 4 years. • During this phase of the process, the list should be constrained based on an agency’s ability to fund projects over a four-year period, not availability of PID resources. • Consider incorporating candidate projects with completed PIDs and candidate projects with PIDs in development. • Do not provide specific years that the projects will be funded until the PID is developed. • Only identify the planned STIP funding cycles (2014 or 2016) For STIP projects. California Department of Transportation

  12. Develop List of Candidate and Shelf Projects (Step 5) • Represent a comprehensive list of priority candidate and shelf projects that can be funded in the next 4 years. • All projects on the list must be included an approved RTP. • Comprehensive approach to managing the PID shelf • The total project list should not exceed total “anticipated” funding capacity. • RTP Proposed Projects • (Funding over 20 Years) California Department of Transportation

  13. Determine PID Workload (Step 6) • Based on the list of candidate projects, Caltrans districts and regional and local agencies will determine PID resource needs. • Include resources needed to update older PIDs that are still a priority and in a RTP. California Department of Transportation

  14. Develop Budget Proposals and Allocate Resources (Step 7) • Using the resource needs identified in the list of candidate projects, the Caltrans will allocate resources to the districts and develop budget proposals for upcoming budget years. California Department of Transportation

  15. Develop, Oversee, and Monitor PIDs (Steps 8, 9, & 10) • Based on approved resources, districts will use state and/or reimbursement resources to develop and oversee PID development. • As PIDs are completed and updated, Caltrans districts will coordinate with local and regional agencies to update information in the candidate list of projects (e.g. PIDs completed, project costs, etc.). • Caltrans will measure the performance of PIDs, which include: • PIDs developed vs. projects programmed; • Costs and time needed to develop and oversee PIDs; and • For Caltrans lead projects, performance of streamline PIDs vs. outcomes in project delivery (local agencies may want to use a similar approach with their projects). California Department of Transportation

  16. Questions California Department of Transportation

More Related