40 likes | 129 Views
ISP Core Advisory Body. The Core Body is currently represented by Junction City, Manhattan, Geary County, Riley County, and Fort Riley. Role: Serves in an advisory capacity to guide and facilitate the ISP - Selects WG membership from Organization Serves as Guides and Mentors for WG’s
E N D
ISP Core Advisory Body • The Core Body is currently represented by Junction City, Manhattan, Geary County, Riley County, and Fort Riley. • Role: Serves in an advisory capacity to guide and facilitate the ISP • - Selects WG membership from Organization • Serves as Guides and Mentors for WG’s • Serves as a sounding board for issues raised by the WG’s • Votes whether to pursue concepts developed by the WG’s • Identifies potential topics for input into the WGs Voting Members NameOrganizationE-mailPhone Gerry Vernon City Manager (J.C.) gerry.vernon@jcks.com 238-3103 Ron Fehr City Manager (Manhattan) fehr@cityofmhk.com587-2404 COL William Clark Fort Riley Garrison Cdr william.j.clark1.mil@mail.mil239-2092 Ben Bennett Geary County Commissioner ben.bennett@gearycounty.org 226-5522 Dave Lewis Riley County Commissioner dlewis@rileycountyks.gov 313-0781 • John Armbrust Gov Mil Council John@manhattan.org 776-8829 Senior Advisory Member
Working Group Overview Public Works WG Emergency Svcs WG Human Capital WG Core Body Recreation WG Transit WG Business Ops/ Finance/Procurement WG - Six Working Group topics have been initially identified - Topic Leads have been identified for each of the six WGs
ARFORGEN CALENDAR FY11-14 Process Overview Outputs Inputs Monthly WG Meetings --in person initially…virtual meetings once WG matured • Minutes/Notes to all members of the Core Body • Recommendations to the Core Body regarding • Mutual Aid Agreements (Service & Equip) • Bulk Purchasing Opportunities • Financial Transaction Processes & Agreements • Challenges requiring higher level emphasis • Cost Benefit Analysis of the Recommendations • Ideas for specific partnership opportunities based on: • Strengths, Capabilities, Gaps/Weaknesses Advice & feedback to the WG members regarding planned agreements/partnerships New ideas for WG consideration Minutes/Notes to all members of the Core Body& WG Member Leads Consolidated Key Recommendations from the WG Meetings Final Legal Review of Recommendations Final Cost Benefit Analysis of Recommendations Scheduled Bi-Monthly --meet as required • Highlights of Approved/ Recommended partnership opportunities to include: • Anticipated impacts to the stakeholders • Cost Benefit results of the partnership Stakeholder Awareness of Partnerships Strengthening Bonds within the CFHR Strategic Communications to internal and external Stakeholders regarding benefits of the Partnerships Quarterly Updates to FHRC