1 / 13

Impact of Nominal and LowP Accelerator Parameters on Detector Performance

This study explores the influence of nominal and LowP accelerator parameters on detector performance and physics potential. Topics covered include beamstrahlung, incoherent pairs, background in pixel detectors, Higgs boson recoil mass, and top mass threshold scans. The LowP parameter set may affect running time, beamstrahlung levels, and precision of physics measurements. Potential impacts on BeamCal, LumiCal, and sensitivity in particle searches are also discussed. Detailed simulations are needed for further analysis.

susanajohnson
Download Presentation

Impact of Nominal and LowP Accelerator Parameters on Detector Performance

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Nominal and LowP Accelerator Parameters – Impact on the Detector Performance and its Physics Potential W. Lohmann, DESY ECFA Valencia meeting

  2. Accelerator Parameters half bunch number and same σxσy half Luminosity double running time half bunch number and smaller σxσy same Luminosity more beamstrahlung (2.5 x) ECFA Valencia meeting

  3. Smaller vertical beamsize: beamstrahlung energy rises from 2 to 6 % of the beam energy Nominal parameters : Eγ = 1.16 x 1011 GeV per bX LowP parameters : Eγ = 2.94 x 1011 GeV Nominal LowP ECFA Valencia meeting

  4. Number and Depositions of Incoherent Pairs Larger number of photons: Nominal parameters : Nγ = 2.6 x 1010 GeV per bX LowP parameters : Nγ = 3.8 x 1010 GeV Higher bunch charge density: Larger number and larger energy of pairs 2 mrad 14 mrad, DID Nominal parameters LowP parameters ECFA Valencia meeting

  5. Energy Depositions of Incoherent Pairs on BeamCal for several accelerator/magnetic field options Epair Nominal parameters LowP parameters ECFA Valencia meeting Ch. Grah

  6. Impact on Particle Searches We want to see Will be there,~! 104 larger cross section Suppress by e- veto Electron veto efficiency forTESLA parameters (as example) (center-of-mass energy 500 GeV) ECFA Valencia meeting

  7. Example for Dm ~ 5GeV In a certain SUSY scenario we expect 20 signal events (500fb-1); Compare this to the expectation of background for several accelerator options (2 mrad) DID B-field Expectation for 14 mrad: (Slightly) worse than for 2mrad (anti-DID field) Dramatically worse for 14 mrad and DID field (as for 20 mrad) How much worse should be quantified! ECFA Valencia meeting V. Drugakov et al.

  8. Potential Background in the Pixel Detectors PT vs polar angle distributions B = 3 T B = 4 T Curling into the first layer of the Pixel detector B = 5 T Deflection limit of nominal case safety margin needed (beams may be not perfect) ECFA Valencia meeting (Cecile Rimbault)

  9. Known from previous studies (K. Buesser, T. Maruyama) TESLA parameters Nominal LowP These studies include only electrons and photons. Neutron production will be also enhanced ! ECFA Valencia meeting

  10. Higgs Boson Recoil Mass No BS 25% Nominal 25% LowP Recoil mass, GeV ( Martin Ohlerich) ECFA Valencia meeting

  11. Threshold Scan, e.g. top mass Nominal LowP ECFA Valencia meeting

  12. Threshold Scan, e.g. top mass 30% Statistical uncertainty ( Stewart Boogert) ECFA Valencia meeting

  13. Summary • The lowP parameter set will either enlarge the running time to reach a certain benchmark, or will increase beamstrahlung substantially. • The latter may have serious impact on physics precision measurements, may become less striking. (mtop,other threshold scans, Higgs boson recoil) • More beamstrahlung induces also more incoherent pairs. • this has impact of the performance of the BeamCal, may have impact on the LumiCal, and enhance background in the vertex and tracking detectors. • Degraded BeamCal photon veto efficiency limits the sensitivity in searches (e.g. low Dm for SUSY, Dm = 5 GeV is a challenge) • The fraction of large pT tracks from e+e- pairs • crossing the vertex detector is growing and might be a dangerous issue • To quantify all topics would need detailed simulations for 14 mrad Xangle ECFA Valencia meeting

More Related