1 / 13

Love it or leave it? The Relationship between Polarization and Credibility of Traditional and Partisan Media

Love it or leave it? The Relationship between Polarization and Credibility of Traditional and Partisan Media. Kang Hui Baek , Mark Coddington , Maegan Stephens, Larissa Williams, Thomas J. Johnson, Jennifer Brundidge The University of Texas @ Austin. BACKGROUND .

susane
Download Presentation

Love it or leave it? The Relationship between Polarization and Credibility of Traditional and Partisan Media

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Love it or leave it? The Relationship between Polarization and Credibility of Traditional and Partisan Media Kang HuiBaek, Mark Coddington, MaeganStephens, Larissa Williams, Thomas J. Johnson, Jennifer Brundidge The University of Texas @ Austin

  2. BACKGROUND Selective Exposure & Polarization Selective Exposure & Credibility

  3. Credibility & Polarization? H1: Individuals who perceive partisan news sources (MSNBC and FOX) as credible will be more polarized in their political attitudes, even after controlling for political and demographic attitudes.

  4. Credibility & Polarization? RQ1: Does perceived credibility of balanced sources (New York Times, Wall Street Journal, CNN, and broadcast television news) link to increased or decreased levels of political polarization after controlling for political and demographic attitudes? RQ2: Do polarized political attitudes link to increased or decreased perceived credibility of partisan sources (MSNBC and FOX) after controlling for political and demographic attitudes, as well as with time spent with media? RQ3: Do polarized political attitudes link to increased or decreased perceived credibility of balanced sources (New York Times, Wall Street Journal, CNN, and broadcast television news) after controlling for political and demographic attitudes ,as well as with time spent with media?

  5. METHOD • NAES 2008 Data (n=16,305) • Believability (New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Fox News, CNN, MSNBC and broadcast television news) • Polarization (Stroud, 2010)

  6. Control variables • Demographics: age, gender, education, race, and income • Political orientation: political ideology, partisanship, political interest, political knowledge • Time spent with sources: political discussion, broadcast or cable, talk radio, newspaper, online

  7. Independent variable • Believability: “How would you rate the believability of (the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Fox News, CNN, MSNBC, and broadcast television news)?-believe all or most of what the organization says -believe almost nothing of what they say

  8. Dependent variable • Polarization -the absolute value of the difference between favorability scores of McCain and Obama (Stroud, 2010) -Higher scores indicated higher levels of polarization (0=very unfavorable; 10=very favorable)

  9. Results (1 of 3) H1: not supported. The lessrespondents believed information from MSNBC (β=-.47, p<.01), the more likely they were to have polarized views.

  10. Results (2 of 3) RQ1: The less respondents believed information from the New York Times (β=- .39, p<.05), CNN (β=-.55, p<.01), and broadcast television news (β=-.39, p<.05), the more likely they were to have polarized views.

  11. Results (3 of 3) • RQ2: Polarization was negatively related to the perceived credibility of MSNBC (β=.-05, p<.01) and not significantly related to Fox News. • RQ3: The less polarized respondents’ views, the more likely they were to believe sources from the New York Times (β=.-06, p<.05) and CNN (β=.-06, p<.01).

  12. DISCUSSION • Why do the credibility perception of the liberal news source corresponded to polarization levels but the conservative news source does not? • Conservatives find the media biased • Liberals may also be turning to conservative sources • Why do those who rate balanced sources as credible have decreased polarization scores? • Balance less appealing to those seeking same viewpoint • Liberals seeking out a variety of sources • Perceived partisan judgments about NYT, CNN, and broadcast.

  13. LIMITATIONS FUTURE RESEARCH Explore Other Contexts Liberal/Conservative Sources Liberal/Conservative indexes • Context Specific • No Causal Claims • Partisan/Balanced Distinction

More Related