1 / 28

The Association Between Midlife Cardiorespiratory Fitness Levels and Later-Life Dementia

The Association Between Midlife Cardiorespiratory Fitness Levels and Later-Life Dementia. April 9 th , 2013 Journal Club. University of Southern California José L González, MD. Introduction. Why this study?.

Download Presentation

The Association Between Midlife Cardiorespiratory Fitness Levels and Later-Life Dementia

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Association Between Midlife Cardiorespiratory Fitness Levels and Later-Life Dementia April 9th, 2013 Journal Club University of Southern California José L González, MD

  2. Introduction

  3. Why this study? • Prevalence • 1/8 Americans > 65yoa • $200b/yr • Why this study? • Prevention of cognitive disability • Lifestyle modification = most cost-effective • Current evidence insufficient • No public health recommendation

  4. Previous Studies • Increased fitness protects against • All-cause mortality • Stroke • Diabetes • HTN • Other studies linked to dementia • Only associated dancing • Only vascular dementia • Only Alzheimers

  5. Previous Studies • Intermediate outcomes • Brain atrophy – med. Temporal lobe vol. • MMSE • NIH consensus statement “physical activity may prevent dementia” • Self-reported physical activity • Canadian study of health and aging • 5-yr f/u, n= 4615

  6. Study Objectives • Assess association between objectively measured fitness and all-cause dementia w/ long-duration of follow-up. • Hypothesized: pts w/ greater midlife fitness = lower risk for dementia later in life • Independent of antecedent cerebrovascular disease

  7. Methods

  8. Methods • Study Design: Prospective, observational cohort study • Cooper Longitudinal Study • Non-profit, independent research organization • Assessing lifestyle behavior on health outcomes • Observational database of 28,968 community-dwelling participants • Dallas, TX

  9. Participants • Generally healthy self-referred/employee referred for preventative health (midlife) exam. • Midlife exam: • H&P (HTN, DM, smoker, level of education) • Physical Exam • Fasting labs (blood glucose, lipids) • Anthropomorphic measurements (Ht, Wt, BMI) • ETT between 1971 - 2001 • Cooper database: n = 28,968 and matched w/ indivdiuals w/ Medicare claims = 25,995

  10. Participants • w/ the following exclusions @ time of midlife exam: • MI or stroke • Chronic illness leading to disability • On renal dialysis • >65yoa • Prior dx of dementia before 1999 • Final cohort, N = 19,458

  11. Measurement of Cardiorespiratory Fitness • Fitness level = Max time on treadmill  METs • Adjusted for age and sex, classified into quintiles • 1 = lowest level • 5= highest level • No categorization or definition of fitness

  12. Outcome Variables • Diagnosis from Chronic Condition Data Warehouse • Data from Medicare beneficiaries for research purposes • Used to identify chronic diseases • Primary Outcome of Interest: diagnosis of all-cause dementia defined by claim filed from • SNF, home health, hospital outpatient or inpatient, physician or supplier claim • 24 different ICD-9 codes for types of dementia: • Alzheimers • Senile • Pre-senile • Vascular

  13. Statistical Analysis

  14. Statistical Analysis • Hazard Ratios = (chance of an event occuring)tx group (chance of an event occuring)control group • Resolution depicted on Kaplan-Meir curve • Proportion of each group where end-point has not been reached • End-point = dx of dementia • Cox-proportional hazards model: estimate of tx effect on survival after adjustment for other explanatory variables

  15. Cox-Proportional Hazards Model • disease-free survival vs 5-level categorical covariate corresponding to age and sex-adjusted quintiles of fitness • Adjusted for demographic and study variables • Sex, exam age, exam year • Adjusted for clinical variables • HTN, fasting glucose level, current tobacco use, BMI, total cholesterol, SBP, DM) • Repeated analysis w/ midlife fitness as a continuous variable (METs) rather than by category (quintile)

  16. Results

  17. Results • Mean follow-up from CCLS data = 24 years • Mean 7.2 years on Medicare data • 1659 cases of all-cause dementia • Prevalence of dementia increased w/ age

  18. Table 1 • Incidence of different variables amongst the 5 quintiles • Raw numbers sorted by clinical variables (HTN, DM, smoker, level of education, FLP, glucose level) • Sorted by quintiles (1 lowest, 5 highest) • Decreased incidence of all variables in higher quintiles • Except etoh intake and education

  19. Figure 1 • Higher fitness levels = lower risk for incident dementia • Similar findings when fitness was modeled on a continuous scale (i.e. by METs) • Figure 1: Kaplan-Meier curve • y-axis: probability of dementia-free survival (%) • x-axis: Age

  20. Table 2 • Derived hazard ratio for each quintile, reference = 1 • Lowest HR in quintile 5 • Statistical significance reached in quintile 3 (CI and P-value) • Adjusted for sex, age and listed RFs • Statistical significance reached in quintile 3 • Adjusted for individual RFs • Only HTN was statistically significant

  21. Results • Association similar among pts w/ & w/o hx of previous stroke • HR w/o stroke 0.74 [CI 0.61-0.90] • HR w/ stroke 0.74 [CI 0.53-1.04]

  22. Discussion

  23. Discussion • Generally healthy community-dwelling pts + association between • Midlife fitness levels (as measured by ETT) • Independent of other RFs • Association present w/ and w/o stroke suggesting a non-vascular MOA • No statistical significance between dementia and education • Homogenous group (see table 1)

  24. Discussion: MOA • Previous studies confirm: ↑fitness = ↓risk DM, HTN • Established RFs for dementia • Previous studies • Brain atrophy • ↑ # small caliber vessels, ↓ tortuosity = ? ↑ blood flow • ↓ prod. Neurotoxins • Enhanced neuroplasticity w/ exercise

  25. Strengths & Weaknesses • Strengths • Large cohort study size • Long duration of f/u • Weaknesses • Not randomized: unmeasured cofounder, such as lifestyle factors could lead to ↑ exercise & ↓ dementia • Based on Medicare claims data • 85% sens, 89% spec

  26. Limitations • Homogenous population (Medicare, non-Hispanic, mid to upper-mid class) • Initial exclusion criteria limits applicability • Can’t give specific recommendations about activity level due to breakdown into quintiles • Future studies should focus on dose-specific relationship to give recs

  27. Sources: • Defina LF, Willis BL, Radford NB, Gao, A, Leonard, D, Haskell, WL et al. The Association Between Midlife Cardiorespiratory Fitness Levels and Later Life Dementia: A Cohort Study. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158:162-168

More Related