250 likes | 356 Views
Searching for light scalar tetraquarks on the lattice. Bled, september 2008 Sasa Prelovsek University of Ljubljana sasa.prelovsek@ijs.si Lattice data from collaboration with Bern-Graz-Regensburg Coll. (BGR) (Daniel Mohler, Christian Lang, Christof Gattringer). Outline. motivation
E N D
Searching for light scalar tetraquarks on the lattice Bled, september 2008 Sasa Prelovsek University of Ljubljana sasa.prelovsek@ijs.si Lattice data from collaboration with Bern-Graz-Regensburg Coll. (BGR) (Daniel Mohler, Christian Lang, Christof Gattringer) Bled 2008
Outline • motivation • challenges • present simulation and its results • previous lattice simulations Bled 2008
Puzzle of light scalar mesons: Model independent determination of poles from exp: sigma: Leutwyler & Caprini 2006 kappa: Descotes-Genon & Moussallam2006 Bled 2008
Tetraquark with diquark anti-diquark structure Jaffe 1977 Jaffe & Wilczek PRL 2003 Jaffe, “Exotica”, 2004 The most titly bound diquark is SCALAR (“GOOD”) diquark SCALAR (“GOOD”) anti-diquark : nonet of SCALAR and color singlet states: Bled 2008
Arguments in favor of tetraquark interpretation • L=1 quark-antiquark mesons expected to be above 1GeV: scalar mesons, axial mesons, tensor mesons • observed m(I=1)>m(I=1/2) for states below and above 1 GeV not possible to explain with pure quark-antiquark states. This ordering is natural in tetraquark picture. - states below 1 GeV could be “pure” tetraquarks - states above 1 GeV could be lin. combinations of (mixing via t’Hooft vertex): t’Hooft, Maiani, Polosa, Isidori, Riquer 2008 • a0(980) strongly couples to KK: Bled 2008
Related observations in favor of tetraquarks:observed X,Y,Z states with charm quarks Experiment: Belle, BaBar, BES, Cleo .... Possible interpreations: tetraquarks [Maiani, Polosa, ...] Bled 2008
Present simulation: searching tetraquarks below 1GeV (s,k,a0,f0) Calculation of the correlator on the lattice: a=0.15 fm, V=163 32 , 123 24 - discard disconnected diagrams - quenched approximation(we needed two different volumes and different shapes of interpolators) above two approximations (used in all previous tetraquark simulations) allow definite quark assignment, no mixing Bled 2008
Present simulation: - Chirally Improved quarks (BGR Coll.) : ms: physical value mu,d : mp= 340, 470, 570 MeV - we study I=0,1/2,1; all previous simulations only I=0 Bled 2008
Challenge is analysis of correlator: 0 t I flavor of source/sink scattering states 0 [ud][ud] sigma p p 1/2 [ud][ds] kappa K p 1 [us][ds] a0 K K, p h to distinguish one-particle (tetraquark) state and scattering states in C(t) Bled 2008
How to distinguish tetraquark from scattering? • we distinguish one-particle and scattering states by considering: • En • volume dependence of wn • properties of scattering: • property of (one-particle) tetraquark: Bled 2008
How to extract several states ? • Ground state: straight forward! • Excited states: challenge! - fitting two exponentials is VERY unstable; fitting more is impossible - All previous tetraquark simulations calculated only a single correlator Bled 2008
Extracting several states: variational method In each flavour channel I=0, 1/2, 1 3x3 correlation matrix evaluated: 3 different smearings at source and the sink: spatially symmetric Jacobi smearing on quarks: narrow (n) & wide (w) Bled 2008
Results for I=0 Bled 2008
Results for I=0: ground state if all tree sources behave close to point-like: then three eigenvalues of 3x3 matrix are: the whole tower of scattering states comes in a single eigenvalue! Bled 2008
I=0 ground state as tower of pp Bled 2008
Results for I=0: ground state k Bled 2008
Results for I=1/2 similar conclusions as in I=0 channel Bled 2008
Results for I=1 analysis of ground state is more complicated: two towers of scattering states KK, pi etass: conventional fit of mass at large t Bled 2008
Summary of our results for I=0,1/2,1 Bled 2008
Summary of our results for I=0,1/2,1 • excited states: to heavy to correspond to light tetraquark candidates: I was not looking for interpretation of these states (they may be also some excited scattering states) • ground state: effective mass and volume dependence of spectral weights roughly consistent with tower of scattering states we find no evidence for light tetraquark at mpi=340-570 MeV Bled 2008
Still hopes for finding tetraquarks! There may still exist possibility for finding tetraquarks on lattice: • at mpi<340 MeV Kentucky group found I=0 tetraquark only for mpi<300 MeV • with larger/different operator basis My current simulations: - mpi=180-400 MeV, overlap fermions, quenched, I=1/2,1, variational method, with Kentucky group - mpi~300 MeV, domain wall fermions, dynamical u,d,s quarks variational method, using RBC/UKQCD propagators Bled 2008
Intermezzo: puzzling meff Effect of finite T on PP state: Bled 2008
Previous tetraquark simulations • all quenched, all discard annihilation contr. • study only I=0 channel (Jaffe studies also exotic I=2 channel) • all consider single correlator I=0 • Alford & Jaffe, 2000 • pp interpolator • one relatively heavy quark mass • different L • only ground state explored • conclusion: shift does not completely agree with FULL (!) scattering prediction: possible indication of tetraquark Bled 2008
Previous tetraquark simulations: • Suganuma, Tsumura, Ishii, Okiharu , 2007 0707.3309 [hep-lat] • diquark antidiquark interpolator • conventional and hybrid boundary conditions • only ground state studied • conclusion: ground state corresponds to scattering Bled 2008
Previous tetraquark simulations: • N. Mathur, K.F. Liu et al. (Kentucky, XQCD Collaboration) [hep-ph/0607110, PRD, 2006] • pp interpolator • range of very small quark masses (overlap fermions) • two volumes • three lowest states explored: sequential Bayes method • conclusion: indication for tetraquark around sigma mass for mpi<300 MeV Bled 2008