150 likes | 280 Views
Improving Wireless Link Throughput via Interleaved FEC. Ling-Jyh Chen, Tony Sun, M. Y. Sanadidi, Mario Gerla Computer Science Department, University of California at Los Angeles. Improving Wireless Link Throughput via Interleaved FEC. Background. Dealing with packet losses: End-to-end
E N D
Improving Wireless Link Throughput via Interleaved FEC Ling-Jyh Chen, Tony Sun, M. Y. Sanadidi, Mario Gerla Computer Science Department, University of California at Los Angeles
Improving Wireless Link Throughput via Interleaved FEC Background Dealing with packet losses: • End-to-end • ARQ: Retransmission in TCP • FEC: Robust Audio Tool (RAT) [14] • Partial Correctness: Interleaving as inVideo transfer protocols [RFC 2354] • Link Layer Level • ARQ: as in HDLC, or Bluetooth link layer protocol • FEC:as in 802.11a and Bluetooth ISCC 2004
Improving Wireless Link Throughput via Interleaved FEC Background • Problems: • ARQ does not perform well for high error rates • FEC works if errors are not bursty • Interleaving introduces latency • Our Proposal: I-FEC • combines FEC and Interleaving at Bluetooth link layer for high-rate bursty errors ISCC 2004
Improving Wireless Link Throughput via Interleaved FEC Background • In Bluetooth DM mode, FEC uses a (15, 10) Hamming code • Each block of 10 information bits is encoded into a 15 bit codeword • Capable of correcting single bit error in each block ISCC 2004
Improving Wireless Link Throughput via Interleaved FEC Gilbert-Elliott Burst Error Model ISCC 2004
Improving Wireless Link Throughput via Interleaved FEC Burst Error Length At high Pbb, burst length are too long; do not expect FEC to work ISCC 2004
Improving Wireless Link Throughput via Interleaved FEC Packet Error Rate after FEC Pgb = 0.0005 • When Pbb is high, FEC does not help much! ISCC 2004
Improving Wireless Link Throughput via Interleaved FEC Proposed Approach: I-FEC • Inherits both the robustness to random errors from FEC and the survivability to burst errors from Interleaving • Simulated I-FEC in Bluetooth, and to Bluetooth DH (no FEC coding) and DM (FEC coding) modes ISCC 2004
Improving Wireless Link Throughput via Interleaved FEC Proposed Approach: I-FEC • Bluetooth DM mode (FECed already!) (b) I-FEC • The FEC overhead is the same as DM mode • The latency caused by interleaving is negligible, since I-FEC interleaves data in bit level within one link layer packet, instead of packet level cross different packets ISCC 2004
Improving Wireless Link Throughput via Interleaved FEC Evaluation • Comparison of I-FEC, DH, and DM mode packets using 5-timeslot Bluetooth packets. • PER with different Pgb and Pbb (using Monte Carlo Simulation) • TCP Throughput with different Pgb and Pbb (using NS2 simulator) • Simulation Topology: (a) one hop (b) two hops ISCC 2004
Improving Wireless Link Throughput via Interleaved FEC Packet Error Rates (1 hop) Pgb = 0.0005 Pbb = 0.2 ISCC 2004
Improving Wireless Link Throughput via Interleaved FEC TCP Performance Pbb = 0.2 Pbb = 0.2 ISCC 2004
Improving Wireless Link Throughput via Interleaved FEC TCP Performance Pgb = 0.0003 Pgb = 0.0003 ISCC 2004
Improving Wireless Link Throughput via Interleaved FEC Conclusion • I-FEC, a hybrid approach incorporating the robustness of FEC coding to random errors and the survivability of interleaving to burst errors • I-FEC is simple and applicable to other link technologies, as long as FEC is already there ISCC 2004
Improving Wireless Link Throughput via Interleaved FEC T h a n k s ISCC 2004