260 likes | 316 Views
The Hidden Emergency Child Malnutrition in Tanzania. Save the Children Tanzania. Overview of presentation. Lessons from Save the Children’s research in Lindi District – cost of diet and study on extreme poverty What is the impact of malnutrition and under-nutrition on children in Tanzania?
E N D
The Hidden EmergencyChild Malnutrition in Tanzania Save the Children Tanzania
Overview of presentation • Lessons from Save the Children’s research in Lindi District – cost of diet and study on extreme poverty • What is the impact of malnutrition and under-nutrition on children in Tanzania? • Policy implications
The study objectives: • To determine what it would take to ensure all households are able to afford a quality diet, particularly for children under two, in Lindi Rural District • To develop an increased understanding of extreme poverty The aims were to feed into two broader related debates; increasing a sense of urgency around the reduction of chronic malnutrition – delivery MDG 1 - and the design of social welfare systems and social protection within them
Some facts about Lindi • Population – 214,885 (2002 census) • Chronic malnutrition rate – 54.4% (38% national average) – the highest in the country • GDP per capita – 150,000 (among the poorest districts in Tanzania) • U1 mortality – 152/1000 • Pregnant women mortality – 166.5/10,000
Table 8 Combined cash income and food production of household profiles
Study Findings Children’s diet is influenced primarily by 3 factors: • Seasonality - post-harvest vs pre-harvest. • 74% of children were fed frequently enough in July compared to 48% in March. Frequency is not the same as quality. • Wealth - At post-harvest timeonly 65% of children in poorer households were fed frequently enough, compared to 100% in middle/better-off households • Age – The frequency of feeding decreases with age. Reports from school children indicated that they only ate once a day, usually at night • The 12 to 23 months age group is of particular concern - only 23% were fed frequently enough pre-harvest and 56% post-harvest.(During this age children should be fed at least 4 times a day).
Globally, child under-nutrition is responsible for half of all child deaths Source: Black RE, Morris SS, Bryce J (2003) Where and why are 10 million children dying every year? Lancet; 361: 2226-34
What MDG 1 says • Eradicate extreme poverty and hunger Target 1 • Halve, between 1990 and 2015, the proportion of people whose income is less than one dollar a day. Target 2 • Halve, between 1990 and 2015, the proportion of people who suffer from hunger (measured by underweight)
Infant undernutrition is irreversible - It happens early and its costs persist throughout life and are transferred to next generation % Age (months) source: TDHS 1999
Stunting at Age 2 - Tanzania Normal 49% Moderate 28% Severe 23%
1% decrease in height 1.4% decrease in productivity Source: Haddad & Bouis, 1990 Consequence of Stunting Reduces Physical Capacity & Productivity UNICEF/91-029 J Schytte
Total Economic Loss from Stunting & Iron/Iodine Deficiency, Tanzania 2000-2010 Total: 2,822 Billion TShs Anaemia 323 1,237 Stunting 1,262 Mental Impairment
Tackling child malnutrition is Everybody’s business, nobody’s responsibility
Conclusions of Study Findings in Lindi District • Diet quality/diversity needs improving, either through maximising the existing food available, increasing people’s access with a cash transfer, and/or through a system of supplementation. • Feeding frequency/quantitycould be improved by a cash transfer scheme. Feeding frequency is constrained by women’s workload, particularly in poor households. Any scheme must take into account other essential needs (not just the cost of diet). • Measures to improve children’s diet are particularly essential in the pre-harvest to prevent the seasonal decline. • The relevance of cash transfers, supplementation or a combination of both needs further debate to determine what is structurally feasible, sustainable and efficient.
Recommendations Government and DPG establish nutrition group with high level of ownership and leadership from Presidential level, review / strengthen a nutrition policy and strategy with implementation plan and resources. This will need to include a strategy for high level advocacy for national ,regional and district level decision makers. • GOT/DPG to prioritise social protection programmes within effective national social welfare systems linked to national planning processes. The Social Protection Framework under development needs to be approved, resourced and implemented as a matter of priority. • These systems must provide direct financial and other benefits; particularly to families who are extremely poor in the form of cash transfers - pensions, child benefit, disability allowance, benefit for the chronically sick and nutrition programmes appropriate for different age groups. • GOT and DPG to include civil society at national, district and sub district levels to pilot and test social welfare and protection initiatives as above within national and district planning and budgeting frameworks. This has to include funding
Recommendations Government and DPG to review and evaluate whether their indirect investments really do tackle malnutrition, reform them accordingly, and ensure they have human resources to do that Start reporting against the internationally agreed indicator on nutrition and use nutrition indicators to report progress in food security, safety nets and social protection, governance, water and sanitation and health Districts to include nutrition and other social protection interventions into Council Plans and Budgets