1 / 35

Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II

Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II. Radar Methods – General Overview Part 2. tom.h.wilson tom.wilson@mail.wvu.edu. Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown, WV.

sybil
Download Presentation

Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II Radar Methods – General Overview Part 2 tom.h.wilson tom.wilson@mail.wvu.edu Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown, WV

  2. GPR resolution issues will be similar to those for seismic. Resolution will be dependant on the wavelet’s spectral content – it’s bandwidth and peak frequencies, phase (shape) and duration. Thickness =Vp/4

  3. ~30 Hz Peak ~40 Hz Peak

  4. Constructiveinterference Destructive interference Horizontal resolution and the Fresnel zone

  5. Horizontal Resolution: The Fresnel Zone

  6. The Fresnel Zone Radius Rf An approximation

  7. Topographic variations must also be compensated for. Daniels, J., 1989

  8. West Pearl Queen Field Area

  9. Surface along the GPR line shown below was very irregular so that apparent structure in the section below is often the result of relief across features in the surface sand dune complex. Dune surface topography

  10. GPR data is often collected by pulling the GPR unit across the surface. Subsurface scans are made at regular intervals, but since the unit is often pulled at varying speeds across the surface, the records are adjusted to portray constant spacing between records. This process s referred to as rubbersheeting. Daniels, J., 1989

  11. Smith and Jol, 1995, AG

  12. Increased frequency and bandwidth reduce the dominant period and duration of the wavelet

  13. Comparison of the 25MHz and 100 MHz records Smith and Jol, 1995, AG

  14. We also expect to see decreased depth of penetration (i.e. increased attenuation) for higher frequency wavelets and components of the GPR signal. Smith and Jol, 1995, AG

  15. Sensors & Software Inc. - Ekko Updates

  16. GPR unit Sensors & Software Inc. – Smart Cart Visit http://www.sensoft.ca/

  17. Sensors & Software Inc. – Salt Water Infiltration

  18. Sequestration occurred in a depleted oil field. • Location near Hobbes, NM • West Pearl Queen formation, ~4500 feet deep • About 20 years of oil and gas production • A few years of inactivity • Injection of ~2100 tons CO2 over 2 months • Subsequent production Bromhal et al., 2004 Perry-Castaneda Library Map Collection

  19. MM&V activities cover a lot of ground “MM&V is defined as the capability to measure the amount of CO2 stored at a specific sequestration site, monitor the site for leaks or other deterioration of storage integrity over time, and to verify that the CO2 is stored in a way that is permanent and not harmful to the host ecosystem…Subsurface MM&V involves tracking the fate of the CO2 within the geologic formations underlying the earth and possible migration to the surface.” - Sequestration Roadmap, 2004 Bromhal et al., 2004

  20. First, geologic characterization of deep layers • Nine wells in immediate area • Several hundreds in surrounding area • 3-D seismic survey Bromhal et al., 2004

  21. Simulation of flow in reservoir • Porosity and permeability maps generated • Production history • 4-D seismic for validation Bromhal et al., 2004

  22. The pilot site is located approximately 25 miles southwest of Hobbs, NM. Oil and gas fields in the area are highlighted in red. Map taken from Ward (1986) (http://geoinfo.nmt.edu/ staff/scholle/guadalupe.html An introduction and virtual geologic field trip to the Permian reef complex, Guadalupe and Delaware mountains, New Mexico-West Texas).

  23. West Pearl Queen Field Area Topography is a problem

  24. Diffraction hyperbola having a velocity of 0.19 m/ns is displayed next to a shallow diffraction originating in the near surface sand cover.

  25. Elevation minus depth to the caliche

  26. Gamma ray log from the Stivason #5 well 400 meters east of the Stivason #4 injection well. The low gamma ray response between 4 and 9 feet subsurface is associated with the Mescalero caliche.

  27. GPR profile located 275 meters northwest of the injection well illustrates the general character of the reflection events from the Mescalero caliche observed across the site.

  28. Abrupt thinning and disappearance of caliche reflection events are illustrated in this GPR profile.

  29. Thickness of the Mescalero caliche estimated from interpreted two-way radar reflection travel times through the caliche using an interval velocity of 0.15m/ns. Interpreted faults/fracture zones and areas of missing caliche are highlighted.

  30. Concentrations of PDCH measured during a 54-day exposure period are superimposed on an orthophoto of the pilot site. The locations of the injection well, CATS, interpreted faults, and eroded caliche areas are shown for reference.

  31. PDCB concentrations measured during the 54 day exposure period.

  32. Near-surface flow models can help in locating samplers, examining results. • Atmospheric transport • Diffusion in near-surface Bromhal et al., 2004

  33. Dates to remember Resolution Exercise Today Next Tuesday & Thursday Term Report Presentations Summaries December 8th December 8th Term Reports Final Exam - 11am-1pm Thurs, Dec. 15th

  34. Exam Review

More Related