1 / 30

Efficacy of Produce Wash Product: Use of Fresh Potatoes as Model System for Evaluating Pathogen Control in Produce Pro

Efficacy of Produce Wash Product: Use of Fresh Potatoes as Model System for Evaluating Pathogen Control in Produce Processing. Peter Gray, Dong-Hyun Kang. Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-6376

sylvana
Download Presentation

Efficacy of Produce Wash Product: Use of Fresh Potatoes as Model System for Evaluating Pathogen Control in Produce Pro

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Efficacy of Produce Wash Product: Use of Fresh Potatoes as Model System for Evaluating Pathogen Control in Produce Processing Peter Gray, Dong-Hyun Kang. Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-6376 Jeff Kronenberg. Department of Food Science & Toxicology, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844-2312

  2. Foodborne Illness in the USA(Source: CDC) • 76 million illnesses every year • Results in 300,000 hospitalizations • Causes 5,000 deaths • Increasing incidence of STEC O157 infections traced to fresh produce, while those related to meats decreasing

  3. Outbreak-Associated Cases of Foodborne Illness (CDC)- 2006 • 1 STEC O157 outbreak (32 confirmed cases) traced to spinach • 2 STEC O157 outbreaks (14 confirmed cases) traced to lettuce • Multistate outbreak of Salmonella Typhimurium (58 confirmed cases) traced to tomatoes • Outbreak of Salmonella Newport (37 confirmed cases) traced to tomatoes

  4. Escherichia coli O157:H7 Outbreak traced to raw spinach from Salinas Valley, California, 2006. 199 cases in 26 states(CDC)

  5. Salmonella Typhimurium Outbreak traced to tomatoes, 183 cases in 21 states, 2006 (FDA)

  6. Bacterial Soft Rot of Potatoes • Caused by Gram-negative bacterium Pectobacterium carotovorum ssp. carotovorum (formerly classified as Erwinia cartovora ssp. carotovora) • Dissolves middle lamella (intercellular cement), causing vegetables to liquify

  7. Search for Effective Produce Sanitizers • Must be effective in wash flumes and dip tanks under a wide variety of water conditions • Increasing consumer demand for effective but safe, “natural”, “environmentally-friendly” disinfectants

  8. Produce cleaner and antibacterial agent Ingredients: citric acid, sodium lauryl sulfate, grapefruit oil extract, sodium carbonate. All FDA GRAS. Very safe and easy to store, handle, and prepare; available to general public Used at pH 3.0; 5 g/L powdered formulation, 1:128 (v:v) liquid formulation WSU Sensory panel detected no off-flavors in FIT-treated baked potatoes HealthPro Brands FIT® Fruit and Vegetable Wash

  9. Chlorine Dioxide (ClO2) • Approved for use on fresh fruits and vegetables • Hazardous ingredients (sodium chlorite, hydrochloric acid, sodium hypochlorite) • Hazardous to store and prepare • Personal protective gear required • Commonly used at 5 ppm free ClO2 • ClO2 produces no toxic by-products or off-flavors in produce

  10. FIT Testing Protocol – Fresh Pack Potato Operation Assay for aerobic plate count (bacterial microflora) and Gram negative bacteria (indicator of enteric human pathogens and Pectobacterium soft rot) • Flume washed potatoes – powdered FIT, untreated water control • Spray bar treated potatoes – liquid FIT, 9 ppm ClO2, untreated water control

  11. Reduction of Gram Negatives, APC in Fresh Pack Potato Tubers

  12. Reduction of Gram Negatives, APC in Fresh Pack Potato Flume Water

  13. Sanitizer Evaluations Utilizing Bacterial Suspensions in Vitro • Chemicals: powdered FIT, liquid FIT, 9 ppm ClO2, water control • Bacteria suspended in treatment solutions, enumerated at selected intervals • E. coli O157:H7, S. Typhimurium, P. carotovorum ssp. carotovorum tested • Both deionized and potato flume water evaluated

  14. Reduction of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Vitro Using Deionized Water Treated With Sanitizers

  15. Reduction of Salmonella Typhimurium in Vitro Using Deionized Water Treated with Sanitizers

  16. Reduction of Pectobacterium carotovorum ssp. carotovorum in Vitro Using Deionized Water Treated with Sanitizers

  17. In Vitro Trials Using Sterile Flume Water From Fresh Pack Potato Operation • 330 mg/L total dissolved solids • 2,186 mg/L total suspended solids • Water containing soil particles, potato tissues present serious challenges to sanitizers Flume water (left), deionized (right)

  18. Reduction of Escherichia coli in VitroUsing Flume Water Treated with Sanitizers

  19. Reduction of Salmonella Typhimurium in Vitro Using Flume Water Treated with Sanitizers

  20. Reduction of Pectobacterium carotovorum ssp. carotovorum in Vitro Using Flume Water Treated with Sanitizers

  21. Tests on Inoculated Potato Tubers • E. coli O157:H7, S. Typhimurium inoculated onto unwashed tubers and dried • Treatments prepared with flume water • Tubers agitated in treatment solutions, removed at selected intervals, enumerated Treatments • FIT (powdered and liquid formulations) • 9 ppm ClO2 • Flume water control

  22. Reduction of Escherichia coli O157:H7 on Inoculated Potatoes

  23. Reduction of Salmonella Typhimurium on Inoculated Potatoes

  24. Tests on Uninoculated Potato Tubers • Unwashed, uninoculated tubers agitated in treatment solutions, removed at selected intervals, enumerated • Aerobic Plate Count (APC) • Yeasts • Molds

  25. APC of Uninoculated Potato Tubers in Flume Water Treated With Sanitizers

  26. Yeast Microflora of Uninoculated Potato Tubers in Flume Water Treated With Sanitizers

  27. Mold Microflora of Uninoculated Potato Tubers in Flume Water Treated With Sanitizers

  28. Conclusions – Potato Wash Water • FIT highly effective (>6 log reduction in 30 sec) against cell suspensions of enteric pathogens and P. carotovorum ssp. carotovorum under all water conditions tested • Limited APC reduction, possibly due to acid-resistant yeasts and molds • ClO2 effective only in low solids water • FIT has significant potential for preventing cross-contamination of pathogens in flumes and dip tanks with high soil loading

  29. Conclusions – Potato Tuber Tests • Low impact from both disinfectants • In lab tests FIT reduced enteric pathogens by 1.4-1.8 log but only after 5 min; ClO2 resulted in <0.9 log reduction • In lab tests FIT reduced APC, yeasts, molds by 0.8 – 1.2 log; ClO2 was no more effective than water control • Potato tubers represent challenges due to heavy soils, lenticels, other surface features • More research needed involving other vegetable models

  30. Acknowledgements • Todd Wichmann, HealthPro Brands, Inc. of Cincinnati, Ohio • Wada Farms Marketing Group, LLC. Of Pingree, Idaho • International Dioxide, Inc. of North Kingstown, Rhode Island

More Related