1 / 75

Malekpour M.D Associated professor of pathology Afzalipour Medical School

Journal club session. Malekpour M.D Associated professor of pathology Afzalipour Medical School. History. The first journal club was founded by Sir James Paget, a British Surgeon in the mid-1800’s

Download Presentation

Malekpour M.D Associated professor of pathology Afzalipour Medical School

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Journal club session Malekpour M.D Associated professor of pathology Afzalipour Medical School

  2. History • The first journal club was founded by Sir James Paget, a British Surgeon in the mid-1800’s • “Small room over a baker’s shop near the Hospital-gate where we could sit and read the journals” Journalclub session

  3. History • Sir William Osler organized a journal club at McGill University in 1875 • Several authors suggest that journal clubs were found in certain European countries (in particular, Germany and England) prior to that time. Journalclub session

  4. History • In the early 1900s in Germany, journal clubs were routinely found in departments of medicine and medical schools. • From 1917-1975, journal clubs evolved into a forum for continuing medical education. Journal club session

  5. History Journal clubs are currently found in the fields of medicine, surgery, psychiatry, nursing, pharmacy, obstetrics and gynecology, pediatrics and geriatric social service. Journal club session

  6. History This powerful educational tool has played an active role in medical education for over a century. The journal club should be more formally incorporated into the medical educational curriculum. Journal club session

  7. Significance • In a 1995 survey of program directors in the eastern United States, Sidorov found: • 95% of internal medicine training programs had an activejournalclub. • More than 80% of internal medicine, family practice, emergency medicine, and physical medicinejournalclubsmeet at least once monthly, usually during the working hours, typically reviewing between two and three articles per session.. Journal club session

  8. Educational Objectives • Provide update of current clinical evidence about a topic • Promote EBM and evidence-based clinical practice • Advance critical appraisal skills JC:Objective &Goals

  9. Educational Objectives • Improving clinical practice – bridge between research and practice, between knowledge and care • Build database of reviewed material for group • Learn skills relevant to performing research, research design • Develop presentation skills JC:Objective &Goals

  10. Research Objectives • Preparation to publish results • Be a stimulus for research ideas • Provide accreditation JC:Objective &Goals

  11. Objective and Goals Goals may vary between meetings JC:Objective &Goals

  12. Objective and Goals Present situation of journal club session Journal club session

  13. Traditional JCS • information need • Teaching and leaning • Use of information • Reinforcement of learning Journl club session

  14. information need • Trainee chooses topic at random • Lack of clinical context • Lack of systematic literature search Traditional JCS

  15. Teaching and leaning • No critical appraisal • Mentors comments are generally based on personal experience and opinion • Lack of deep leaning process Traditional JCS

  16. Use of information • Information is quickly for gotten • It can not be easily retrieved when required Traditional JCS

  17. Reinforcement of learning • In the absence of a clinical context , acquired knowledge is seldom applied • There is no assessment of educational activity Traditional JCS

  18. Problems Lack of • Acquisition • Appraise • Application • Assessment Traditional JCS

  19. Critical appraisal • Three important question • Are the results of the study valid ? • What are the results ?(Sensitivity ; specifity ; PPV and NPV) • Will the results help locally Journal club session

  20. The way of the problem resolution Use of articles with different methods and similar results Journal club session

  21. The way of the problem resolution Use of articles with contradictive results Journal club session

  22. The way of the problem resolution CPC-like Presentation Journal club session

  23. The way of the problem resolution Detailed analysis of article Journal club session

  24. The way of the problem resolution • Problem based journal club • Trainee centered journal club • Problem solving journal club Journal club session

  25. Trainee centeredJCS • information need • Teaching and leaning • Use of information • Reinforcement of learning Journal club session

  26. Information need • Trainee identifies a clinical problem • Problem are discussed in a small group ( Answerable questions ) Trainee centered JCS

  27. Teaching and learning • Systematic literature searching ( computerized ; Cochrane library ) • Critical appraisal Trainee centered JCS

  28. Use of information • Information is stored electronically • It can be easily retrieved when required Trainee centered JCS

  29. Reinforcement • Practical use of acquired knowledge • Resolution of clinical problem • Use of feed back and assessment • Recognition of effort by electronic dissemination Trainee centered JCS

  30. Transforming a traditional JC into an EBCP JC • design and implement a formal patient-based or problem-based curriculum • sources of evidence Evidence-based clinical practice JC

  31. Preparing for one journal club:3-6 weeks before: • Presenter chooses a “real patient” scenario in which a clinical question has arisen • Presenter discusses with faculty mentor & develops PICO question (patient, intervention, comparison intervention, outcome) • Presenter searches for evidence (utilizes librarian, library, resources) • Presenter and mentor decide if patient problem & evidence are appropriate for JC Evidence-based clinical practice JC

  32. Preparing for one journal club:3-6 weeks before: • Presenter develops synopsis of patient scenario/problem/question • Presenter selects one key article (and possibly supportive papers) • Presenter & mentor select appropriate method for analyzing, appraising, & presenting Evidence-based clinical practice JC

  33. Preparing for one journal club:3-6 weeks before: • Presenter selects a clinical content expert for guidance • Leader selects appropriate worksheet/checklist tool • Leader commits to attend or identifies a substitute facilitator Evidence-based clinical practice JC

  34. 2 weeks before: • Announcement to participants/attendees (2 weeks before) • Invite special clinical experts Evidence-based clinical practice JC

  35. 1-2 weeks before: • Presenter prepares presentation of scenario + summary & critical appraisal of literature + discussion elements • Presenter meets with faculty mentor and reviews presentation • Leader prepares 5-10 minute interactive teaching points (Mini-Lesson) • Prepare extra paper copies of the key article Evidence-based clinical practice JC

  36. 2 days before: • Reminder announcement to participants/attendees • Check food arrangement • Check materials: flip chart, pens, projector Evidence-based clinical practice JC

  37. Presenter • presents patient scenario • provides summary analysis of the key papers • leads the discussion of critical appraisal of the evidence • leads a discussion of what this means for this patient –resolution of the patient scenario/question – what this means for our patients Evidence-based clinical practice JC

  38. Facilitator • highlights EBCP elements & teaching points • guides discussion, uses open-ended questions • prompts debate, plays devil’s advocate if needed Evidence-based clinical practice JC

  39. Clinical Expert • explains complex medical aspects • gives insight into study methods and design • provides commentary of current best practice Evidence-based clinical practice JC

  40. Participants • read at least the key article prior to journal club • use worksheet to prompt critical appraisal thinking Evidence-based clinical practice JC

  41. Journal Club Format • meet & greet • 15-30 minutes social time with food • 60-90 minutes journal club presentation and discussion • evaluation of presenter (private), evaluation of JC (open) Evidence-based clinical practice JC

  42. Factors associated with success • Sidorov defined successfuljournalclubsas those with longevity (at least 2 years) and high levels of resident participation (at least 50% attendance) Journal club session

  43. Factors associated with success • The overall satisfaction score was highest when thejournalclubwas held in the evening or at a faculty member's home. The format of thejournalclubwas not associated with the overall satisfaction score. Journal club session

  44. Factors associated with success • practice-based, problem-based case scenario(Slawson 2005, O’Brien Cochrane) • high attendee interest in subject matter (Heligman) • discussion of complex, controversial issues; care issues with uncertainty Journal club session

  45. Factors associated with success • valid articles • integrated teaching of critical appraisal skills • formal instruction in biostatistics and epidemiology • checklists: review instrument (Burstein 1996) Journal club session

  46. Factors associated with success • Discussion of impact of the articles on practice • involvement of faculty with interest knowledge skills • food provided prior to start of session Journal club session

  47. An Asynchronous International Journal Club A Working Model J Ellis, L Ellis, A Penstien, A Goldsmith JEllis@JournalReview.org SUNY Downstate

  48. Goals • JournalReview.org will create an engaged international community of physicians, researchers, universities, policy makers, and others interested in published medical literature.

More Related