340 likes | 425 Views
Eco-Efficiency of Take-Back and Recycling A comprehensive and quantitative approach. Jaco Huisman, Ab Stevels. Outline. Methodology QWERTY: Recyclability from an environmental perspective? EE: Eco-Efficiency: Relation environment and economics? Requirements Examples
E N D
Eco-Efficiency of Take-Back and RecyclingA comprehensive and quantitative approach Jaco Huisman, Ab Stevels
Outline • Methodology • QWERTY: Recyclability from an environmental perspective? • EE: Eco-Efficiency: Relation environment and economics? • Requirements • Examples • Eco-efficiency directions • Conclusions
Why QWERTY? (Quotes for environmentally Weighted RecyclabiliTY) • General Idea: • Replace ‘weight’ by ‘environmental weight’: • Environmental value of disposed products • Optimal recycling routes • Priorities of different materials • How effective are proposed recycling targets and treatment rules? • Environmental description of the end-of-life chain
Authorities/ Legislators Meaningful criteria Policy per product category Monitor performance Designer Evaluate (re)design NGO’s/ Customer organizations Green demands and corresponding price tags Producers Calculate End-of-Life costs Audit recyclers Consumers Environmental value for money Recyclers Calculate tariffs Technology improvement Why Eco-Efficiency of End-of-Life? Economic description of the end-of-life chain
Requirements • Data (Dutch take-back system): • Product compositions • Disassembly/ shredding and separation • LCA methods and standard databases • Collection rates, transport distances, costs • Recovery processes: metal smelters etc. • Final waste processing: emissions and penalties
Examples • ‘Weight’ (MRE) versus ‘Environmental Weight’ (QWERTY) • Contribution of processes • Plastic recycling or separate treatment of cellular phones • Design strategies • Plastic recycling versus size of housings
Weight composition QWERTY composition WEIGHT ENVIRONMENTAL WEIGHT Contribution of materials (cellular phone)
Eco-efficiency directions: ENCOURAGE • Direction: • Increase collection rates precious dominated products • Separate collection system for precious dominated products • Plastic recycling large sized housings, already disassembled
Eco-efficiency directions: AVOID • Direction: • Incineration without energy recovery • Residue fractions with low plastic content send to the cement industry
Eco-efficiency directions: BALANCE High priority Low priority
Conclusions (Policy Strategies) Problem: End-of-life treatment has to do with material compositions and not with categories Solution: Review (current EU) policy strategies • Drastically review recycling targets • Apply differentiated collection rates • Apply certain outlet rules • Discard most of the current treatment rules and apply certain new ones
Further applications • Audit and improve recycler performance • Monitoring take-back systems as a whole • Evaluate design strategies and life-cycle perspective • Award good ecodesign of individual products in a collective system • Broader regional and product scope
More information about this presentation or the Ph.D. thesis:J.Huisman@io.tudelft.nl
Contribution of materials (DVD player) Weight composition Environmental weight composition
Example: DVD player, Integral Costs Excluding consumer to retailer/ municipality costs (to EUR 1,66)
DVD player: Eco-efficiency direction ENCOURAGE
Soundmachine: Plastic Recycling? (EI’99) BEST CASE! (under economies of scale realized)
Glass recycling 17”Monitor? (15 kg, glass: 9,5 kg; increase glass recycling 15% to 70%)
Conclusions (Methodology) • An end-of-life chain approach and evaluation is the first requirement • It is possible to monitor eco-efficiency of take-back systems and single products quantitatively • It is possible to quantify the contribution of different actors and stakeholders • It is possible to set priorities regarding materials and end-of-life options (where to invest first?) • It is possible to quantify how much “environmental improvement” for “money invested” is realized